Strengthening Democracy in Indonesia: Comparison between Representative and Direct Presidential Election Policies

Main Article Content

Boy Anugerah https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8212-6528

Abstract

The direct presidential election policy was implemented in Indonesia for the first time in 2004 as a result of the third amendment to the constitution in 2001, and it continued in the next presidential elections. This kind of election has replaced the old representative presidential election policy. However, since the implementation in 2004, there have been many criticisms from several parties. These parties consider this to have negative impacts, such as black campaigns, hoaxes, hate speeches, and social gaps in society. Therefore, they propose to return the mechanism to the old policy. This article aims to analyze and compare the two presidential election policies and strive for an optimal presidential election policy to improve the quality of democracy in Indonesia. To present the results, we have reviewed secondary data mainly from the literature (journal, book, and act) and conducted in-depth interviews with scholars in the field. The main finding is that the direct presidential election policy is proven to improve the quality of democracy by fulfilling the three main aspects of the Indonesia Democracy Index (IDI). Nevertheless, to make it better, some improvements are needed as follows: reforming political parties, implementing the convention system, removing the presidential threshold, providing an independent channel to become a candidate, strengthening the responsibility and integrity of state officials in law enforcement, and regulating all negative impacts in binding regulations

Article Details

How to Cite
Anugerah, B. (2022). Strengthening Democracy in Indonesia: Comparison between Representative and Direct Presidential Election Policies. Jurnal Studi Sosial Dan Politik, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19109/jssp.v6i1.10650
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Boy Anugerah, School of Government and Public Policy Indonesia (SGPP Indonesia) / Expert Staff at the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia

Boy Anugerah was born in Baturaja, South Sumatera Province. He holds two master's degrees, M.Si. from the National Resilience Study Universitas Indonesia and M.P.P. from the postgraduate program SGPP Indonesia. He is currently working as the Expert Staff for the Vice-Chairman of MPR RI. 

References

Agustino, L. (2002). Pemilihan Presiden Secara Langsung Untuk Indonesia. Jurnal CSIS, Year XXI Number 2, 246-260.
Ardipandanto, A. (2015). Kelemahan Pelaksanaan Pilpres 2014: Sebuah Analisis. Jurnal Politica Volume 6 Number 1, 87-106.
Aspinall, E. (2010). Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society. Singapore: Institute of South East Asian Studies.
Aspinnal, E. (2010). Soeharto's New Order and Its Legacy: Essays in Honour of Harold Crouch. Canberra: ANU Press.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2007). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: PT. Buana Ilmu Populer.
BPS RI. (2019). Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia 2018 Mencapai 72,39. Jakarta: BPS RI.
Hanan, D. (2016). Memperkuat Presidensialisme Multipartai di Indonesia: Pemilu Serentak, Sistem Pemilu, dan Sistem Kepartaian. Jurnal Universitas Paramadina Volume 13, 1452-1454.
Indarja. (2018). Perkembangan Pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden di Indonesia. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Volume 47 Number 1, 63-70.
Kompas.com. (2019, November 28). PBNU Usul Presiden Dipilih MPR, Ini Kata Wapres Ma'ruf Amin. Retrieved September 8, 2020, from Kompas.com: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/11/28/19200261/pbnu-usul-presiden-dipilih-mpr-ini-kata-wapres-maruf-amin?page=all
Kompas.com. (2019, February 1). Soal Netralitas PNS, Melihat Kembali Saat Orde Baru Mempolitisasi Korpri. Retrieved September 7, 2020, from Kompas.com: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/02/01/18231181/soal-netralitas-pns-melihat-kembali-saat-orde-baru-mempolitisasi-korpri?page=all
Kompas.com. (2020, January 13). KPU: Sejarah Singkat, Visi Misi, Tugas, dan Wewenang. Retrieved September 2020, 2020, from Kompas.com: https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2020/01/13/070000869/kpu--sejarah-singkat-visi-misi-tugas-dan-wewenang?page=all
Mahfud MD, M. (2007). Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi. Jakarta: Penerbit LP3ES.
Merdeka.com. (2019, November 27). PBNU Usulkan Pemilihan Presiden Kembali ke MPR. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from Merdeka.com: https://www.merdeka.com/politik/pbnu-usulkan-pemilihan-presiden-kembali-ke-mpr.html
Potter, J. (2013). An Analysis of Thinking and Research about Qualitative Methods. New York: Routledge.
Rantau, M. I. (2019). Penguatan Sistem Presidensial di Indonesia. PELITA - Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah, 182.
Romli, L. (2018). Problematik dan Penguatan Sistem Presidensial. Jurnal Communitarian (Prodi Ilmu Politik) Volume 1 Number 1, 6.
Soerya, H. (2013). Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Dalam Demokrasi Elektoral. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Volume 43 Number 3, 356.
Surbakti, R. (1992). Memahami Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.
Tamrin, A. (2013). Urgensi Pemilu Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Secara Langsung di Era Reformasi. Jurnal Cita Hukum Volume 1 Number 2, 187-194.
Tempo.co. (2004, May 22). Lima Pasangan Capres dan Cawapres Jadi Peserta Pemilu 2004. Retrieved August 30, 2020, from Tempo.co: https://nasional.tempo.co/read/42842/lima-pasangan-capres-cawapres-jadi-peserta-pemilu-2004
Universitas Diponegoro. (2020). Academic Constitutional Drafting: Evaluasi Terhadap UUD NRI 1945. Jakarta: Badan Pengkajian MPR RI.
Wahyuningsih, T. (2001). Pemilihan Presiden Secara Langsung. Yogyakarta: PT. Tim Kencana.
Wheare, K. (1975). Modern Constitution. London: Oxford University Press, New York-Toronto.
Zuhro, P. R. (2019). Demokrasi dan Pemilu Presiden 2019. Jurnal Penelitian Politik LIPI Volume 16 Number 1, 69-81.