Peer Review Policy
The research article submitted to this online journal will be double-blind peer-reviewed (Both reviewer and author remain anonymous to each other) at least 2 (two) reviewers. The accepted research articles will be available online following the journal peer-reviewing process.
Type of peer review
Review process employs a double blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa.
Review reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:
- Is original by stating the objectives and gap clearly
- Is methodologically sound
- Follows appropriate ethical guidelines
- Has results/findings which are clearly presented and support the conclusions
- Correctly references previous relevant work
- Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.
Decision
Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. Editor's decision is final.
Becoming a Reviewer
If you are not currently a reviewer for Muamalah : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, but would like to be added to the list of reviewers, please contact us. The benefits of reviewing for Muamalah : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah include the opportunity to see and evaluate the latest work in related research area at an early stage, and to be acknowledged in our list of reviewers. You may also be able to cite your work for Muamalah : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah as part of your professional development requirements.