Legal Enforcement Against Non-Compliance by Ex-Husbands with Court Orders on Iddah and Mut’ah Support
Main Article Content
Abstract
The failure of a husband to comply with a Religious Court’s ruling on nafkah ‘iddah and mut’ah raises important concerns about the actual enforceability of such decisions, the legal consequences of non-compliance, and the effectiveness of existing mechanisms for enforcing judgments that have attained final and binding legal status. This study aims to scrutinize, from a juridical standpoint, the enforcement mechanisms applied in response to former husbands’ noncompliance with judicial decrees concerning the disbursement of iddah and mut’ah entitlements. This research uses an empirical juridical method with a descriptive qualitative approach because it aims to understand legal phenomena in depth through narrative analysis. The primary dataset comprises insights obtained through interviews with a panel of judges from the Banten High Religious Court, former wives deprived of iddah and mut’ah support, and former husbands who failed to execute court-mandated financial obligations pertaining to said supports. Secondary materials encompass adjudications issued by religious courts, statutory instruments, scholarly volumes, legal periodicals, juridical essays, and expert commentaries. The research findings show that one of the effective law enforcement models is the addition of a clause in the verdict containing property guarantees that can be confiscated if the husband defaults. In addition, the contribution of law enforcement can be realized through the issuance of special regulations that strengthen the execution of decisions. This study highlights the urgent need to strengthen the enforceability of court rulings and to harmonize existing legal frameworks to ensure consistent compliance with post-divorce nafkah and mut’ah obligations.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Nurani by http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/Nurani is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Abqa, M. A. R., Hidayah, A., Sitanggang, C. E. P., Annisa, F., Khasanah, D. D., Tarmizi, R., & Ramadhani, D. W. (2024). Peradilan & Penegakan Hukum. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.
Agha, K. D. M., Mahmoud Ibrahim El Nafad, & Sutrisno Hadi. (2024). Unravelling the Threads: Bibliometric Exploration of Islamic Family Law Research in Southeast Asia (2004-2024). Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 24(2), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v24i2.24755
Al-Jauziyyah, I. Q. (1983). I’lam al-Muwaqqi’in ’an Rabb al-’Alamin (Juz 1). Dar al-Jael.
Amru Hasibuan, Hasibuan, K., & Nuranisa Nasution. (2025). Nafkah Istri pada Masa Iddah dalam Cerai Hidup Menurut Hukum Islam (Studi Kasus Desa Aek Nabara Tonga Kecamatan Aek Nabara Barumun). Jejak Digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(3), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.63822/s98fd138
Arifuddin, Q. (2024). Registration of Marriage as Fulfillment of Marriage Requirements According to Islamic Principles. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 24(2), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v24i2.24529
Asshiddiqie, J. (2007). Pokok-pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Buana Ilmu.
Ayu, R. F. (2021). ‘Iddah Wanita Hamil Karena Zina Menurut Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 4(1), 216. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v4i1.10097
Badri, M. A., Burhanuddin, A., & Jauhar, G. (2024). Factors Influencing The Increase in Khulu’s Divorce: A Case at The Jember Religious Court (2021-2023). Al-’Adalah, 21(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v21i1.21074
Busro, A. D., & Busro, H. A. B. (2000). Asas-asas Hukum Tata Negara. Ghalia Indonesia.
Delyarahmi, S., & Siagian, A. W. (2023). Perlindungan Terhadap Supporter Sepak Bola Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia: Studi Kasus Tragedi Kanjuruhan. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(1), 89–102.
Devy, S., & Suci, D. M. (2020). The Implementation of Verdict Execution on Providing Maḍiyah Maintenance Following Divorce According to Islamic Law (Case Study in Syar’iyyah Court Banda Aceh). Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 4(2), 416–442. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v4i2.6179
Djokosutono. (1998). Hukum Tata Negara (H. Alrasid (ed.)). Ghalia Indonesia.
Fahrul, M., Saharuddin, S., & Adhilia, L. T. F. (2023). Kewajiban Memberi Biaya Penghidupan Oleh Suami Kepada Mantan Istri (Studi Komparasi Antara Hukum Islam dan Hukum Perdata). Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 1–15.
Farid, D., Abdulah Pakarti, M. H., Mabruri, K. A. K., Kusmardani, A., & Lestari, E. (2023). Harmonizing the Iddah Period for Women Divorced Outside the Court According to KHI and Fiqh Law. JUSTISI, 10(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v10i1.2455
Heniyatun, H., Sulistyaningsih, P., & Anisah, S. (2020). Pemberian Mut’ah dan Nafkah Iddah dalam Perkara Cerai Gugat. Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam, 21(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v21i1.11647
Huzaimah, A., & Tamudin, M. (2024). Material Rights of Children in Guardianship Maqashid al Sharia Perspective. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 24(1), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v24i1.22180
Isjwara, F. (2001). Pengantar Ilmu Politik. Bina Cipta.
Juanda, E. (2020). Eksistensi hak asasi manusia dan alternatif penyelesaian atas pelanggarannya dalam negara hukum Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 8(1), 98–108.
Mertokusumo, S. (2010). Bunga Rampai Ilmu Hukum. Liberty.
Praja, J. S. (1993). Filsafat Hukum Islam. Yayasan Piara Pengembangan Agama dan Humaniora.
Ridwan, H. (2013). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Ridwan, M. (2018). Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Terkait Nafkah Iddah, Mut’ah. Jurnal USM Law Review, 1(2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v1i2.2255
Saleh, T., Hayatuddin, K., & Wardhana, A. W. (2023). Factors of Unfulfilled Rights of Wife and Children as Consequences of Divorce in Religious Court Decisions. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 23(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v23i1.16644
Sanusi, S., Iman, R. Q., Baihaki, R., & Farhan, I. (2023). Judges’ Ijtihad on Women’s Rights after Divorce and its Contribution to Family Law Reform in Indonesia. SMART: Journal of Sharia, Traditon, and Modernity, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24042/smart.v3i1.16981
Sholihuddin, M., Jazil, S., & Ni’am, S. (2024). Remarriage in The’Iddah Perspective of Maqāṣid Al-Usrah: Study in Wedoro Waru, Sidoarjo, Indonesia. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 8(2), 726–749.
Sholikhah, A., & J, J. (2023). Judge’s Consideration of Post-Divorce Rights (‘Iddah and Mut’ah) from The Perspective of Maslahah Mursalah. Sakina: Journal of Family Studies, 7(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.18860/jfs.v7i2.3780
Sinaga, I., Asmuni, A., & Tanjung, D. (2024). Whole of Government: An Effective Strategy for Ensuring Child Support Post-Religious Court Rulings. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 24(2), 375–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v24i2.24714
Soekanto, S. (2007). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Suherman, A. M. (2004). Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Susylawati, E. (2020). The Judge Principle Is Active In Case of Divorce In Madura District Religious Court. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 14(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v14i2.2435
Swantoro, H. (2018). Dilema Eksekusi: Ketika Eksekusi Perdata Ada di Simpang Jalan Pembelajaran dari Pengadilan Negeri. Rayyana Komunikasindo.
Tardjono, H. (2021). Urgensi Etika Profesi Hukum Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(2), 51–64.
Utami, T. R., Apriliandi, G., Akbar, F. M., Wandono, H., & Destia, I. W. (2023). Eksekusi Putusan dan Implikasi Hukum Bagi Pihak yang Tidak Patuh dalam Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum, 16(01), 144–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v16i01.924
Waluyo, B. (2022). Penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Wati, N. (2024). Hubungan antara Hak dan Kewajiban Warga Negara dalam Pancasila: Peran, Perlindungan, Partisipasi dan Penegakan. SULTAN ADAM: Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial, 2(2), 295–307.
Wirastri, T. D., & van Huis, S. C. (2024). The State of Indonesia’s Marriage Law: 50 Years of Statutory and Judicial Reforms. AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 24(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v24i2.38424
Yasmin, A., Ramadhoifah, H. A., & Afifah, A. R. (2024). Peradilan Agama Sebagai Lembaga Penegak Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Sriwijaya Journal of Private Law, 1(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28946/sjpl.v1i1.3373
Yuni, L. A., & Kasuma, J. (2023). The Fulfillment of Women’s Rights in Verstek Decisions at Samarinda and Sangatta Religious Court. Al-’Adalah, 20(2), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v20i2.16119
Yusmad, M. A. (2018). Hukum di Antara Hak dan Kewajiban Asasi. Deepublish.