- Scopus Citedness
- Editorial Team
- Peer Reviewers
- Focus and Scope
- Peer Review Process
- Submission and Author Guidelines
- Open Access Policies
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statements
- Publication Fees
- Professional Editing Services
- Indexing and Abstracting
- Publisher
- Conflict of Interest and Copyright Notice
- Contact Us
Peer Review Process
Research articles or Manuscripts submitted to Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran are initially reviewed by the editors for general fit with the Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran focus and scope and for the writing quality. Only those research articles meeting the Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran focus and scope will be sent to reviewers for a double blind review. Review time is typically 4-6 months. Two reviewers will be assigned to evaluate the research articles or manuscripts on the basis of their expertise. Reviewers are expected to return their reviews within 4 weeks. A third reviewer will be appointed in case one of the reviewers disagrees upon the quality of the research article for publication. The assigned reviewers evaluate the research articles by using a standard manuscript evaluation form. They are required to treat all the information in the research articles as confidential. Views of the assigned reviewers serve as a guide to Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran editors to make a final decision on the research articles. Final decision always belongs to Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran editors. Those manuscripts that are judged by the editors and assigned editors to be inappropriate are rejected promptly without external reviews.
The editors then make a decision based on the reviewers' advice, from among several possibilities:
|Accept as written without any revisions|
|Accept with minor revisions (a second round of review is not necessary)|
|Accept with major revisions (a second round of review will be necessary)|
|Reject (the paper is not suitable for publication)|