Analisis Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik pada Materi Struktur Atom Menggunakan Five-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Berbasis Piktorial

Main Article Content

Sururin Nufus
Ifah Silfianah

Abstract

Misconceptions are one of the causes of students learning difficulties. One of the misconceptions about chemistry is the atomic structure. In general, chemistry subjects are abstract and difficult to visualize. It causes students to find it difficult to understand chemical concepts correctly. Misconceptions that occur in students will have an impact on understanding further material. Therefore, it is necessary to do an analysis to identify students who experience misconceptions so that efforts can be made to prevent and correct them. Misconceptions experienced by students can be identified through diagnostic tests, one of which is the five-tier diagnostic test. Most of the five-tier diagnostic tests used are narrative-based, which triggers student saturation. Therefore, this study uses a five-tier diagnostic test combined with a pictorial test. This research is to find out students misconceptions experienced by X-class SMA in the matter of atomic structure. This study uses a quantitative descriptive method. The instrument used in this study was a pictorial-based, five-tier diagnostic test consisting of 24 items. The results showed that students experienced misconceptions about atomic structure material with an average percentage of 20%. Students experience misconceptions about the concept of the development of atomic theory (18%), atomic constituent particles (23%), isotones, isobars, and isotopes (21%), and electron configurations (20%). Factors that cause misconceptions experienced by students include their prior knowledge, their interest in studying atomic structure material, the sources of their personal thoughts, their low ability and reasoning in understanding atomic structure material, and their lack of instilling concepts in them.

Article Details

How to Cite
Analisis Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik pada Materi Struktur Atom Menggunakan Five-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Berbasis Piktorial. (2023). Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 7(2), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v7i2.19239
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Analisis Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik pada Materi Struktur Atom Menggunakan Five-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Berbasis Piktorial. (2023). Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 7(2), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v7i2.19239

References

A’yun, Qurrota, and Dan Murbangun Nuswowati. 2018. “Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostic Multiple Choice Berbantuan Cri (Certainty of Response Index).” Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia 12 (1): 2108–9.
Candraningrum, Erika, and Suandi Sidauruk. 2021. “Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Two - Tier Multiple Choice Pada Konsep Partikel Materi Untuk Peserta Didik Kelas IX Identifying Misconceptions Using a Two - Tier Multiple - Choice Diagnostic Test of Material Particle.” Journal of Environment and Management 3 (2): 117–24.
Chang, Raymond. 2004. Kimia Dasar. Konsep-Konsep Inti, Jild I/Edisi Ketiga,. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Effendy, Prof. 2017. Molekul, Struktur, Dan Sifat-Sifatnya. Malang: Indonesian Academic Publishing.
Elvina, Annisa, and Latisma DJ. 2022. “Deskripsi Pemahaman Multirepresentasi Kimia Siswa Pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit Dan Non Elektrolit.” Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia 6 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v6i1.12009.
Fajriani, Gita N, Wahyu Sopandi, and Asep Kadarohman. 2019. “Miskonsepsi Siswa Yang Menggunakan Teks Perubahan Konseptual Mengenai Hukum-Hukum Dasar Kimia.” Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia 3 (1): 30–41. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v3i1.3361.
Gavrila, and Suherman. 2020. “Analysis of Student Conception of Atomic Structure at the State SMA in Palu.” Jurnal Akademika Kimia 9 (2): 111–17. https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2020.v9.i2.pp111-117.
Inggit, Sheila Mutiara, Winny Liliawati, and Iyon Suryana. 2021. “Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Dan Penyebabnya Menggunakan Instrumen Five-Tier Fluid Static Test (5TFST) Pada Peserta Didik Kelas XI Sekolah Menengah Atas.” Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics 6 (1): 49–68. https://doi.org/10.15575/jotalp.v6i1.11016.
Isnaini, Muhammad, and Wiwid Pungki Ningrum. 2018. “Hubungan Keterampilan Representasi Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Kimia Oragnik.” Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia 2 (2): 12–25.
Istijabatun, Siti. 2008. “Pengaruh Pengetahuan Alam Terhadap Pemahaman Matapelajaran Kimia.” Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia 2 (2): 323–29.
Lahinda, Claudya Gabby, and Jeanne M Tuerah. 2021. “Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Hukum Dasar Kimia Menggunakan Two-Tier Diagnostic Test Di SMA Negeri 1 Tatapaan.” Oxygenius 3 (1): 35–39. https://doi.org/10.37033/ojce.v3i1.268.
Mellyzar, Fakhrah, and Isnani. 2022. “Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA: Menggunakan Instrumen Three Tier Multiple Choice Pada Materi Struktur Atom Dengan Teknik Certanty of Response Index (CRI).” Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2438.
Melykhatun, Rizka Ayu, F.Widhi Mahatmanti, and Nanik Wijayanti. 2019. “Pengembangan Media Chemo-Edutainment Berbasis Intertekstual Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Kimia SMA Kelas XI Materi Hidrokarbon.” Journal of Chemistry In Education 2 (3): 133–39.
Rosita, Imas, Winny Liliawati, and Achmad Samsudin. 2020. “Pengembangan Instrumen Five-Tier Newton Laws Test (5TNLT) Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa.” Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi 6 (2): 297–306. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i2.2018.
Santi, Atika Nur Is, and Mike Rahayu. 2022. “Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit Dan Non Elektrolit Menggunakan Instrumen Multirepresentasi Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Berbasis Piktorial.” UNESA Journal of Chemical Education 11 (3): 210–19.
Sari, Winda Fradika, Husna Amalya Melati, and Rody Putra Sartika. 2018. “Deskripsi Retensi Siswa Kelas X Sma Negeri 1 Nanga Taman Pada Materi Perkembangan Teori Atom.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa 7 (10): 1–11.
Siska, and Pangoloan Soleman Ritonga. 2021. “Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA PGRI Pekanbaru Pada Materi Asam Basa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Four-Tier.” JEDCHEM (Journal Education and Chemistry 3 (2): 2021.
Siswaningsih, Wiwi, Nahadi, and Deden Kusuma. 2017. “Pengembangan Tes Pilihan Ganda Piktorial Untuk Mengukur Penguasaan Pengetahuan Faktual, Konseptual, Dan Prosedural Siswa Sma Pada Materi Kelarutan Dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan.” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Kimia 3 (2): 118–29.
Suardana, I Nyoman, and Putu Prima Juniartina. 2020. “Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Kimia Dasar Berbasis Inkuiri.” ASIMETRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains 1 (11): 62–73.
Tamungku, Rivya, Djefry Tani, and Jeanne Tuerah. 2019. “Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier Multiple Choice Pada Materi Struktur Atom Di SMA Negeri 1 Remboken.” Oxsigenius 1 (2): 66–71.
Tri Astuti, Resti, and Hasan Marzuki. 2018. “Analisis Kesulitan Pemahaman Konsep Pada Materi Titrasi Asam Basa Siswa Sma.” Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia 1 (1): 22–27. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v1i1.1862.
Utami, Ika, Bakti Mulyani, and Sri Yamtinah. 2020. “Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Asam-Basa Dengan Two Tier Multiple Choice Dilengkapi Interview.” Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia 9 (1): 89–97. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/JPKim/article/view/34078.
Wayan Suja, I. 2015. “Penggunaan Analogi Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia.” JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia) 3 (2): 397–410. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v3i2.4457.
Wulandari, Crislia A, and Rusmini. 2021. “Pengaruh Penggunaan Lkpd Dengan Model Pembelajaran Ecirr Dalam Mereduksi Miskonsepsi Pada Materi Stoikiometri Kelas X Sma.” Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia 5 (1): 1–12. file:///D:/Sri Mulyanti/riset/artkel orbital.pdf.