Factors Affecting Toxic Friendship Communication In Work Organizations In Palembang City

Main Article Content

Rina Pebriana
Gita Astrid
Fera Indasari

Abstract

The work environment is a second home for people who have jobs. Communication behavior in friendship is important in building a good social relationship. However, not all friendships can have a positive impact, on the other hand, they can also have a negative impact, such as the term toxic friendship (bad/toxic friendship) in the work environment. This research aims to determine the factors that influence toxic friendship communication in work-organizational life in Palembang City. The theory used in this research is social identity theory. The research method uses quantitative with a total of 50 respondents. The data uses questionnaire data collection techniques via Google Forms. The research results show that if it is known that the KMO MSA value is 0.500 < 0.50 and the Bartlett's Test of Sphericity (Sig.) value is 0.000 < 0.05, then the factor analysis can be continued because it meets the first requirement. The MSA value of all variables studied is > 0.50, so the second requirement in this factor analysis is fulfilled. The extraction value for all variables is >0.50. Thus it can be concluded that all variables can be used to explain factors. The variance explained table and Screen Plot show that 4 component points have an eigenvalue >1, so it can be interpreted that 4 factors are formed in toxic friendship communication that occurs in the work environment in Palembang City. The research results show that friendship dynamics can reveal the emergence of toxic friendships with unhealthy patterns. Friendships in a toxic work environment in the city of Palembang can be characterized by a lack of boundaries in communication, conflicts that are not resolved properly at work, and the emergence of passive aggressiveness at work, or even emotional manipulation

Article Details

How to Cite
Factors Affecting Toxic Friendship Communication In Work Organizations In Palembang City. (2024). Wardah, 25(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.19109/azmet184
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Factors Affecting Toxic Friendship Communication In Work Organizations In Palembang City. (2024). Wardah, 25(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.19109/azmet184

References

Amir, M., Wajdi, R., & Syukri. (2020). Perilaku Komunikasi Toxic Friendship (Studi terhadap Mahasiswa Fisip Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar) . Jurnal Komunikasi dan Organisasi (J-KO), 02(02), 93–111

Anisyah, S. (2022). Women Pregnancy amids Covid-19: Understanding Vulnerability, Developing Vaccine Strategy, and Capacity in Palembang. Jurnal Studi Sosial Dan Politik, 6(2), 205-216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19109/jssp.v6i2.13350

Balancing Interests in Responding Pandemic Covid-19 in Palembang: The Policy Networks Analysis. (2023). Jurnal Studi Sosial Dan Politik, 7(1), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.19109/jssp.v7i1.16118

Bhat, M. M., Hosseini, S., Awadallah, A. H., Bennett, P. N., & Li, W. (2021). Say ‘YES’ to Positivity: Detecting Toxic Language in Workplace Communications. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Findings of ACL: EMNLP 2021, 2017–2029. https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/2021.FINDINGS-EMNLP.173

Bhat, S. A., Patni, P., Bhat, S. A., & Patni, P. (2023). A review: Impact of motivation and toxic work around job culture. https://wjarr.com/sites/default/files/WJARR-2023-0463.pdf, 17(3), 747–751. https://doi.org/10.30574/WJARR.2023.17.3.0463

Cupach, W. R. (2000). Advancing Understanding about Relational Conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(5), 697–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500174013/ASSET/0265407500174013.FP.PNG_V03

Democratizing Public Services in Indonesia: Analysis for Mall Public Service in Palembang. (2023). Jurnal Studi Sosial Dan Politik, 7(2), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.19109/jssp.v7i2.18977

Faris, R., Felmlee, D., & McMillan, C. (2020). With Friends Like These: Aggression from Amity and Equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 126(3), 673–713. https://doi.org/10.1086/712972

Gangemi, J. (2024). Komunikasi Beracun di Ruang Kerja Virtual: Kewajiban yang Membayangi bagi Perusahaan Jarak Jauh dan Hibrida | Toptal®. Toptal. https://www-toptal-com.translate.goog/insights/distributed-teams/toxic-work-environment?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=id&_x_tr_pto=tc

Hasanah, L. M. (2022). PENGARUH TOXIC FRIENDSHIP TERHADAP PERSEPSI SOSIAL PADA MASA REMAJA DI PONDOK PESANTREN MIFTAHUL HUDA 06 KECAMATAN SUMBER JAYA KABUPATEN LAMPUNG BARAT. Universitas Lampung.

Hasegawa, K. (2024). Human Dignity as a Global Common Good. Dalam R. Gotoh & T. University (Ed.), Dignity, Freedom and Justice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0519-1_5

Lavorgna, A., & Powell, A. (2023). Addressing Antisocial Behaviour and Toxic Communication Online. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research,

McKeown, S., Haji, R., & Ferguson, N. (2016). Understanding Peace and Conflict Through Social Identity Theory. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29869-6

Metode Baru Indeks Pembangunan Manusia 2010-2021. (t.t.). www.bps.go.id. Diambil 25 Januari 2024, dari https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/26/413/1/-metode-baru-indeks-pembangunan-manusia.html

Mislawaty, S. E., Harahap, R., & Anisyah, S. (2022). Digitalizing Governance in South Sumatera: An Introduction “E-Sumsel” System Reforming Public Service Management. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.399-411

Munn, L. (2020). Angry By Design : Toxic Communication and Technical Architectures. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 7, 7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00550-7

Pavlova, E., Terentyeva, E., & Matevosyan, A. (2020). Toxic communication as a risk factor when promoting Health, Safety & Environmental culture in an organization. E3S Web of Conferences, 169, 05003. https://doi.org/10.1051/E3SCONF/202016905003

Peyton, T., & Zigarmi, D. (2024). Employee perceptions of their work environment, work passion, and work intentions: A replication study using three samples. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 27(2), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211002210/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_23409444211002210-FIG5.JPEG

Reza, I. F. (2020). TOXIC FRIENDSHIP IN ISLAMIC PSYCHOLOGY PERSPECTIVE. Fakultas Psikologi. https://psikologi.radenfatah.ac.id/berita/detail/toxic-friendship-in-islamic-psychology-perspective

Shapiro, D. L. (2010). Relational Identity Theory: A Systematic Approach for Transforming the Emotional Dimension of Conflict. American Psychologist, 65(7), 634–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0020004