Pengembangan Bahan Ajar PAI SMP NU Palembang Berbasis Kemampuan Otak

Main Article Content

Zuhdiyah Zuhdiyah

Abstract

Learning is related to students' understanding of the material taught by the teacher so that students get the best results. The problems that exist, the teaching materials of Islamic Education and Character used in NU Middle School have not been compiled based on needs analysis and are not developed based on the rules of developing standardized teaching materials. So that this study aims to produce a model of teaching material for Islamic Education and Character Skills for Class VII Palembang NU Middle School Based on Brain Ability that is valid, practical, and effective. The type of research used is the research and development model Jan Van Den Akker. Results obtained from the study are: (1) RPP based on the results of theoretical studies that are in line with the results of needs analysis; (2) teaching materials for Islamic Education and Character in SKI Material for Class VII Palembang NU Middle School Based on Brain Ability has been proven to be valid, practical and effective. Valid with an average score of 99.09%; practical with perceptual scores in the range 1024 and 1280 (in the category strongly agree); effective with the results of the Paired T test 32,769 with a significance level of 0.00 or 32,769> 0.00 so that it can be concluded that H0 is rejected, therefore Ha is accepted.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zuhdiyah, Z. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar PAI SMP NU Palembang Berbasis Kemampuan Otak. Intizar, 24(2), 51-62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19109/intizar.v24i2.3128
Section
Artikel

References

Belawati, T. (2003). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan Universitas Terbuka.
Bella, R. A. (2016). Investigating Psychological Parameters of Effective Teaching in a Diverse Classroom Situation: The Case of the Higher Teachers’ Training College Maroua, Cameroon. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(23), 72–80.
Darmansyah. (2010). Strategi Belajar Menyenangkan dengan Humor. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design. Belmont. CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
Girault, J.-A., & Greengard, P. (2004). The neurobiology of dopamine signaling. Archives of neurology, 61(5), 641–644.
Haruyama, S. (2011). The Miracle of Endorphine: Sehat mudah dan praktis dengan hormon kebahagiaan. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka.
Jensen, E. (2008). Brain-Based Learning: Pembelajaran Berbasis Kemampuan Otak, Cara Baru dalam Pengajaran dan Pelatihan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Khaidir, C. (2016). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Metode Numerik Berbasis Konstruktivisme Di IAIN Batusangkar. Ta’dib, 19(1), 67–82.
Lukman, L., & Ishartiwi, I. (2014). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar dengan Model Mind Map untuk Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(2), 109–122.
McDonough. (2005). Jo and Christopher Shaw, Materials and Methods in ELT. Hongkong: Blackwell Publishing.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. In Qualitative data analysis: a sourcebook of new methods. Sage publications.
Muhaimin. (2008). Upaya Mengefektifkan Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Octaviani, S. (2017). Pengembangan bahan ajar tematik dalam implementasi kurikulum 2013 kelas 1 sekolah dasar. EDUHUMANIORA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2), 93–98.
Segev, A., Curtis, D., Jung, S., & Chae, S. (2016). Invisible brain: Knowledge in research works and neuron activity. PloS one, 11(7), e0158590.
Tomlinson, B. (2003). Deveoping Materials For Language Teaching. London: Continuum.
Westwood, P. (1996). Effective teaching. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 21(1), 5.