The Relationship between Philosophy, Balaghah, and the Qur'an: A Study of Manahij Tajdid fi an-Nahwi wa al-Balaghah wa at-Tafsir wa al-Adab by Amin Al-Khuli

Main Article Content

Ja'far Rais Abdurrahman
M. Fauzan Zenrif

Abstract

 This paper discusses Amin Al-Khuli's views on the Science of Balaghah and its relationship with the sciences of Philosophy and Psychology, as well as highlighting manipulation in the Qur'an. This research focuses on the relationship between Balaghah and Psychology, using the library research method. The author uses the book "Manahij Tajdid fi An-Nahwi wa Al-Balaghah wa At-Tafsir wa Al-Adab" as the main reference, accompanied by various relevant literature sources. The analysis was conducted to understand the implications of philosophy's relation to Balaghah Science, psychological manipulation in the Qur'an, as well as ideas and examples of psychological exposure in Islamic sacred texts. In this study, researchers found that Balaghah and Psychology are interrelated. The concept of Balaghah which includes the use of language and rhetoric in the Qur'an can affect the psychology of the reader. Psychological manipulation in the Qur'an is also found in the form of the use of language and rhetoric that aims to influence readers. However, the researcher emphasizes that such manipulation is not negative, but rather an attempt to help the reader understand the Qur'ānic message better. This research provides substantial insight into understanding the Qur'an from the perspective of Balaghah and Psychology. The library research method used allows the researcher to gain a deeper understanding of Amin Al-Khuli's views and provides a clear picture of the relationship between Balaghah and Psychology. Thus, this study can be an important reference for researchers and readers who are interested in understanding the Qur'an from this perspective.

Article Details

How to Cite
The Relationship between Philosophy, Balaghah, and the Qur’an: A Study of Manahij Tajdid fi an-Nahwi wa al-Balaghah wa at-Tafsir wa al-Adab by Amin Al-Khuli. Kitabina: Jurnal Bahasa & Sastra Arab, 4(02), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.2345/kitabina.v4i02.20550
Section
Articles

How to Cite

The Relationship between Philosophy, Balaghah, and the Qur’an: A Study of Manahij Tajdid fi an-Nahwi wa al-Balaghah wa at-Tafsir wa al-Adab by Amin Al-Khuli. Kitabina: Jurnal Bahasa & Sastra Arab, 4(02), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.2345/kitabina.v4i02.20550

References

Afandi, Muslim. “Al-Qur’an Dan Psikologi Muslim.” State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, 2018. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sph&AN=119374333&site=ehost-live&scope=site%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.032%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.010%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.006.
Aflisia, Noza. “Teaching Balaghah for the Purpose of Appreciation of Al-Quran Language.” Lughawiyyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab 4, no. 2 (2022): 156–72. https://doi.org/10.38073/lughawiyyat.v4i2.537.
Al-Faruqi, Ismail Raji. Islamization Of General Principles and Work Plan, 1981.
Al-khuli, Amin. “مناهج تجديد في النحو والبلاغة والتفسير والأدب.” Cairo: Mahrajan Al-qiroah li Al-jami’, 2003.
Al-Mesilini, Seyed Zuhair. “Principles Of Realizing Social Justice From The Perspective Of The Qur ’ an And Nahj Al-Balaghah” 1 (2023): 2029–54.
Anam, Fahrul. “Islamic Philosophy and the Development of Islamic Thought.” International Journal of Nusantara Islam 7, no. 2 (2019): 160–66. https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v7i2.5636.
Ayubi, Sholihudin Al. “Hubungan Filsafat Dan Bahasa Arab.” Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam 12, no. 474 (2019): 54–76.
Azka, Muhammad Fadhila. “Filsafat Bahasa Dan Penafsiran Al-Qur’an (Studi Analisis Proyeksi Al Qur’an Tentang Filsafat Bahasa Dalam Tafsir Imâm Fakhr Al Dîn Al Râzî).” Tesis, 2019, 1–182.
Cahyono, Bowo. “PSIKOLOGI AL- QUR’AN,” 2021.
Effendi, Syahrun. “Linguistik Sebagai Ilmu Bahasa” 1 (1983).
Gama, Cipta Bakti. Fondasi Psikopatologi Islam. Edited by Rain Vidiansyah. Pustaka Sophia, 2019.
Ghazali, M. Bahri. “Epistemologi Al-Ghazali.” Alqalam 18, no. 90–91 (2001): 174. https://doi.org/10.32678/alqalam.v18i90-91.1469.
Hamzah. “Metode Penafsiran Muhammad Bin Ali Al-Balansi Dalam Tafsir Mubhamat Al-Qur’an.” Hikami : Jurnal Ilmu Alquran Dan Tafsir 1, no. 2 (2020): 52–60. https://doi.org/10.59622/jiat.v1i2.45.
Hermawan, Sulhani. “Mohammed Arkoun Dan Kajian Ulang Pemikiran Islam,” n.d., 101–21.
Hidayat, Aat. “Psikologi Dan Kepribadian Manusia: Perspektif Al-Qur’an Dan Pendidikan Islam.” Jurnal Penelitian, 2018. https://doi.org/10.21043/jupe.v11i2.3488.
Miri, Seyyed Mohsen. “Muhammad ‘Abid Al-Jabiri and Arabic Reason: An Analytical Study.” Jurnal Al-Mustafa 1, no. 2 (2012): 37–60.
Nielsen, Katherine. “The Philosophy of Osman Bin Bakar.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22, no. 1 (2008): 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590802280936.
Norliani. “Pendidikan Masa Daulah Gaznawiyah, Buwaikhi, Dan Salajikah (Perkembangan Dan Tokoh-Tokohnya).” Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan 16, no. 2 (2022): 581. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v16i2.918.
Rahman, Fazlur. Islam & Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition, 1982.
Rahman, Habibur. ““Amin Al-Khuli, Pendekatan Kritik Sastra Terhadap Al-Quran.” Al-Irfan 1 (2019): 94–120.
Raimanu, Gusstiawan. “Filsafat Dan Metode Penelitian Pengertian Dan Sejarah Filsafat.” Filsafat, 2015, 1–25.
Setiawan, Mahbub. “The Relationship Between Religion and Reason in Quranic Studies: Insights From Contemporary Islamic Philosophy.” Al Burhan: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur’an 22, no. 02 (2023): 239–52. https://doi.org/10.53828/alburhan.v22i02.1042.
Suparlan. “Psikologi Dan Kepribadian Perspektif Al-Quran.” Humanika, 2018. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v8i1.21005.
Yasin, Hadi. “Sisi Balaghah Dalam Tafsir Al-Baidhawy.” Tahdzib Al-Akhlaq: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 3, no. 2 (2020): 41–61. https://doi.org/10.34005/tahdzib.v3i2.894.