Comparative Analysis of Readability of Arabic Books Using Fry Ghraps and Fog Index

Authors

  • Fadhlan Rizki Ramadhan Suparman universitas pendidikan indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19109/y02j2479

Keywords:

Readability, Fry Graph, Fog Index

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to compare the readability of the textbook "Mari Belajar Bahasa Arab Madrasah Diniyah Takmiliyah Awaliyah untuk Kelas VI (Equivalent to Grade VI SD/MI)" using the Fry Graph and Fog Index. A descriptive method with a qualitative approach was used, involving content analysis based on data from the Fry Graph and Fog Index techniques. Data were collected through note-taking and literature studies, with purposive samples from three book segments (beginning, middle, and end). The Fry Graph results indicated that the book is more suitable for grades 2 to 4, not grades 6, due to its easy readability. Only the third passage matched the intended grade level, while the others could have been better. The Fog Index analysis yielded an average score of 1.9, placing it in the "Very Easy" category, failing to meet the ideal standard for grade 6. The low percentage of complex words (7%) shows that students have mastered most of the material, but the book needs to be more challenging. Keywords: Readability, Fry Graph, Fog Index

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abdul Djaliel, M. (2021). Mari belajar bahasa Arab (F. Ilmiyah (ed.)). Bandung,Rizqi.

Abidin, Y. (2012). Pembelajaran membaca berbasis pendidikan karakter. Refika Aditama.

Andriana, W. (2012). Analisis keterbacaan teks buku pelajaran kelas III SD: studi kasus untuk teks bahasa Indonesia, IPA, dan IPS. Universitas Indonesia.

Bailin, A., & Grafstein, A. (2001). The linguistic assumptions underlying readability formulae: a critique. Language & Communication, 21, 285–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(01)00005-2

Chaniago, Sam Mukhtar, D. (1996). Aspek keterpaduan dan keterbacaan wacana buku ajar bahasa Indonesia untuk kelas I SMU. Lembaga Penelitian IKIP Jakarta.

Fatin, I., & Yunianti, S. (2018). Bahan ajar keterbacaan (Sujinah & P. C. Kartika (eds.)). UMSurabaya Publishing.

Febriana, I., Wulandari, A. N., & Sari, Y. (2022). Keterbacaan buku teks kurikulum merdeka bahasa Indonesia kelas 7 dengan grafik Fry. Basastra, 11(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.24114/bss.v11i2.38197

Fry, E. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. International Literacy Association, Vol. 11, N, 513–578. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40013635

Ginanjar, A. A. (2020). Analisis tingkat keterbacaan teks dalam buku ajar bahasa Indonesia. Literasi : Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Serta Pembelajarannya, 4(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.25157/literasi.v4i2.4216

Gunning, R. (1952). The technique of clear writing. In 1952. McGraw-Hill. http://www.amazon.com/technique-clear-writing-Robert-Gunning/dp/B0006ASTRK

Harjasujana, A., & Mulyati, Y. (1997). Membaca 2. Jakarta, Depdikbud,.

Harjasujana, A. S., Mulyati, Y., & Nurhayatin, N. (1995). Membaca modul 1-12. Karunika, Univesitas Terbuka.

Heilman, M., Thompson, K. C.-, & Eskenazi, M. (2008). An analysis of statistical models and features for reading difficulty prediction. University of Michigan. University of Michigan, 71–79. https://aclanthology.org/W08-0909.pdf

Idham, & Maruti, E. S. (2023). Pengukuran keterbacaan teks materi ajar pada siswa sekolah menengah atas. Jurnal Pendidikan & Pengajaran (Jupe2), 1(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.54832/jupe2.v1i1.95

Marfuah Furusin, D. (2017). Analisis keterbacaan wacana buku teks sejarah kebudayaan islam dengan prosedur klose dalam pembelajaran SKI kelas X di MAN yogyakarta. UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA., 180. http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/25243

Masyhud, S. (2016). Metode penelitian pendidikan. LPMPK.

Mukarromah, M. (2020). Pengembangan buku tata bahasa Arab untuk mahasiswa jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab di Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. TSAQOFIYA : Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab IAIN Ponorogo, 1(2), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.21154/tsaqofiya.v2i1.15

Novianto, S. A., Indonesia, U. P., Abdurrahman, M., Indonesia, U. P., Supriadi, R., & Indonesia, U. P. (2024). Analisis keterbacaan buku “Sabar ” menggunakan teori Fog Index. 4(1), 126–143.

Putri, T. F., Supriadi, R., & Al Farisi, M. Z. (2023). Readability analysis of arabic book based on character values. Al-Lisan, 8(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v8i1.3313

Reni Anggraeni, A. Y. L. S. (2018). Keterbacaan buku ajar bahasa Indonesia di sekolah menengah pertama (text book readability of Indonesian language in junior high school). Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pembelajarannya, 7(2), 293. https://doi.org/10.20527/jbsp.v7i2.4428

Sari, V. (2017). Tingkat keterbacaan buku teks bahasa Indonesia jenjang SMP menggunakan teori Fry. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(3), 1–5.

Septyani, Endah, D., Rafli, Z., & Muliastuti., L. (2020). Keterbacaan wacana buku teks BIPA ‘Sahabatku Indonesia’ tingkat madya. Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 13–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/http:/dx.doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v6i1.5448

Sitepu, B. . (2015). Penulisan buku teks pelajaran. In PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sopian, A., & Tatang, N. N. (2023). Pengembangan bahan ajar digital di era revolusi industri 4.0 bagi guru bahasa Arab di kabupaten Subang. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 6(4), 2614–7947. http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/jppm.v5i3.5672

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian bisnis. Alfabeta.

Supriadi, R., & Fitriyani, N. (2021). Analisis kesesuaian buku teks bahasa Arab berbasis keterbacaan menggunakan ketentuan Fog Index. Arabi : Journal of Arabic Studies, 6(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.24865/ajas.v6i1.232

Wawan, A. (2007). Tingkat keterbacaan wacana sains dengan teknik klos. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 10(6), 196–200.

Downloads

Published

03-07-2024

Issue

Section

Artikel

How to Cite

Comparative Analysis of Readability of Arabic Books Using Fry Ghraps and Fog Index. (2024). Taqdir, 10(1), 35-59. https://doi.org/10.19109/y02j2479