Communication Pattern in social media Metadata with FAIRdata Perspective

Main Article Content

Agus Pamuji
Rina Rindanah
M. Reyhan Fadilah

Abstract

The rise of electronic devices has had a profound impact on the ways in which digital communication tools are utilized within Islamic higher education. This change emphasizes the growing importance of adhering to the FAIR data principles – Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. Despite a significant body of research on these principles, there is a noticeable lack of emphasis on the formal construction of metadata to facilitate seamless information exchange among users and devices. Recognizing this gap, our research is focused on extensively exploring the complexities of metadata usage within Islamic higher education, particularly in the context of cyber communication. Our aim is to conduct a thorough analysis that not only evaluates the current knowledge base but also provides practical insights into implementing metadata to meet the needs of researchers, practitioners, and students engaged in scholarly communication. Additionally, we aspire to develop a comprehensive report that offers an in-depth overview of metadata.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Alhassun, Atheer S., and Murad A. Rassam. “A Combined Text-Based and Metadata-Based Deep-Learning Framework for the Detection of Spam Accounts on the Social Media Platform Twitter.” Processes 10, no. 3 (2022).

Ali, Adnan, Jinlong Li, Huanhuan Chen, Uzair Aslam Bhatti, and Asad Khan. “Real-Time Spammers Detection Based on Metadata Features with Machine Learning.” Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing 38, no. 3 (2023): 241–258.

Allison-Cassin, Stacy, and Dean Seeman. “Metadata as Knowledge.” KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 6, no. 3 (2022): 1–4.

Bahim, Christophe, Carlos Casorrán-Amilburu, Makx Dekkers, Edit Herczog, Nicolas Loozen, Konstantinos Repanas, Keith Russell, and Shelley Stall. “The FAIR Data Maturity Model: An Approach to Harmonise FAIR Assessments.” Data Science Journal 19, no. 1 (2020): 1–7.

Batista, Dominique, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, Susanna Assunta Sansone, and Philippe Rocca-Serra. “Machine Actionable Metadata Models.” Scientific Data 9, no. 1 (2022): 1–8.

Beretta, Valentina, Jean Christophe Desconnets, Isabelle Mougenot, Muhammad Arslan, Julien Barde, and Véronique Chaffard. “A User-Centric Metadata Model to Foster Sharing and Reuse of Multidisciplinary Datasets in Environmental and Life Sciences.” Computers and Geosciences 154, no. July 2019 (2021): 1–10.

Coleti, Thiago Adriano, Pedro Luiz Pizzigatti Corrêa, Lucia Vilela Leite Filgueiras, and Marcelo Morandini. “TR-Model. A Metadata Profile Application for Personal Data Transparency.” IEEE Access 8, no. 1 (2020): 75184–75209.

Erazo-Moreno, Milagros Maria, Gloria María Villa-Córdova, Geraldine Amelia Avila-Sánchez, Fabiola Kruscaya Quispe-Anccasi, Segundo Sigifredo Pérez-Saavedra, and Jhonny Richard Rodriguez-Barboza. “Social Media and Education: Perspectives on Digital Inclusion in the University Setting.” Data and Metadata 3, no. 2 (2024): 1–9.

Fayez Ismail, Orchida. “Constructing a Metadata Model to Capture the Deconstruction of Literary Characters: Remediation of Evil.” Cogent Arts and Humanities 8, no. 1 (2021): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1973649.

Filgueiras, Fernando, and Lizandro Lui. “Designing Data Governance in Brazil: An Institutional Analysis.” Policy Design and Practice 6, no. 1 (2023): 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2022.2065065.

Fox, Nathan, Laura J. Graham, Felix Eigenbrod, James M. Bullock, and Katherine E. Parks. “Enriching Social Media Data Allows a More Robust Representation of Cultural Ecosystem Services.” Ecosystem Services 50, no. September 2020 (2021): 101328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101328.

Furner, Jonathan. “Definitions of ‘Metadata’: A Brief Survey of International Standards.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 71, no. 6 (2020): E33–E42.

Ghiringhelli, Luca M., Carsten Baldauf, Tristan Bereau, Sandor Brockhauser, Christian Carbogno, Javad Chamanara, Stefano Cozzini, et al. “Shared Metadata for Data-Centric Materials Science.” Scientific Data 10, no. 1 (2023): 1–18.

Greenberg, Jane, Ming Fang Wu, Wei Liu, and Fenghong Liu. “Metadata as Data Intelligence.” Data Intelligence 5, no. 1 (2023): 1–5.

Gregg, Will, Christopher Erdmann, Laura Paglione, Juliane Schneider, and Clare Dean. “A Literature Review of Scholarly Communications Metadata.” Research Ideas and Outcomes 5, no. 2 (2019): 1–13.

Heacock, Michelle L., Adeline R. Lopez, Sara M. Amolegbe, Danielle J. Carlin, Heather F. Henry, Brittany A. Trottier, Maria L. Velasco, and William A. Suk. “Enhancing Data Integration, Interoperability, and Reuse to Address Complex and Emerging Environmental Health Problems.” Environmental Science and Technology 56, no. 12 (2022): 7544–7552.

Hippen, Ariel A., and Casey S. Greene. “Expanding and Remixing the Metadata Landscape.” Trends in Cancer 7, no. 4 (2021): 276–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2020.10.011.

Irvin, Vanessa, and Bard. “A Whole New Information World: AI, Bots, Metadata, and Discourse.” International Journal of Information, Diversity and Inclusion 7, no. 1–2 (2023): 1–6.

Jaksic, Danijela, Sanja Candrlic, and Patrizia Poscic. “From User Requirements to Document Repository Enriched with Metadata - A Case Study.” In Procedia Computer Science, 204:760–767. Elsevier B.V., 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.08.092.

Jung, Woojin, Donghun Kim, Seojin Nam, and Yongjun Zhu. “Suicidality Detection on Social Media Using Metadata and Text Feature Extraction and Machine Learning.” Archives of Suicide Research 27, no. 1 (2023): 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2021.1955783.

Kaur, Amarmeet, Medzhakhed Usama, Nur Liana, Doris Hooi-Ten Wong, and Nurazean Maarop. “Literature Review on Metadata Governance Article History.” Open International Journal of Informatics (OIJI) 11, no. 1 (2023): 114–120.

Khader, Mohammed, and Marcel Karam. “Assessing the Effectiveness of Masking and Encryption in Safeguarding the Identity of Social Media Publishers from Advanced Metadata Analysis.” Data 8, no. 6 (2023): 1–22.

Lehne, Moritz, Julian Sass, Andrea Essenwanger, Josef Schepers, and Sylvia Thun. “Why Digital Medicine Depends on Interoperability.” npj Digital Medicine 2, no. 1 (2019): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0158-1.

Leonelli, Sabina, Rebecca Lovell, Benedict W. Wheeler, Lora Fleming, and Hywel Williams. “From FAIR Data to Fair Data Use: Methodological Data Fairness in Health-Related Social Media Research.” Big Data and Society 8, no. 1 (2021): 1–14.

Metadata, Protecting Communication. Analyzing and Protecting Communication Metadata, 2021.

Mohan, Ashok Kumar, Sethumadhavan Madathil, and K. V. Lakshmy. “Holistic Analytics of Digital Artifacts: Unique Metadata Association Model.” International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics 13, no. 5 (2021): 78–100.

Mukesh choudhary, Anshuman v ramani, and vishwas bhardwaj. “The Significance of Metadata and Video Compression for Investigating Video Files on Social Media Forensic.” International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology 3307, no. 3 (2023): 304–313.

Musen, Mark A., Martin J. O’Connor, Erik Schultes, Marcos Martínez-Romero, Josef Hardi, and John Graybeal. “Modeling Community Standards for Metadata as Templates Makes Data FAIR.” Scientific Data 9, no. 1 (2022): 1–15.

Pacheco, Diogo, Pik-Mai Hui, Christopher Torres-Lugo, Bao Tran Truong, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. “Uncovering Coordinated Networks on Social Media: Methods and Case Studies.” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 15, no. 1 (2021): 455–466.

Pasian, Beverly, and Rodney Turner. Design Methods and Practices for Research of Project Management. Design Methods and Practices for Research of Project Management. Routledge, 2024.

Peeters, Stijn, and Sal Hagen. “The 4CAT Capture and Analysis Toolkit: A Modular Tool for Transparent and Traceable Social Media Research.” Computational Communication Research 4, no. 2 (2022): 571–589.

Phillips, Mark E., Oksana L. Zavalina, and Hannah Tarver. “Using Metadata Record Graphs to Understand Digital Library Metadata.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 2019.

Ramachandran, Rahul, Kaylin Bugbee, and Kevin Murphy. “From Open Data to Open Science.” Earth and Space Science 8, no. 5 (2021): 1–17.

Rutherford, Brienna N., Carmen C.W. Lim, Benjamin Johnson, Brandon Cheng, Jack Chung, Sandy Huang, Tianze Sun, Janni Leung, Daniel Stjepanović, and Gary C.K. Chan. “#TurntTrending: A Systematic Review of Substance Use Portrayals on Social Media Platforms.” Addiction 118, no. 2 (2023): 206–217.

Snowden, Derrick P., Vardis Tsontos, Nils Olav Handegard, Marcos Zarate, Kevin M. O’Brien, Kenneth S. Casey, Neville Smith, et al. “Data Interoperability between Elements of the Global Ocean Observing System.” Frontiers in Marine Science 6, no. JUL (2019): 1–15.

Vázquez, Manuel A., Jorge Pereira-Delgado, Jesús Cid-Sueiro, and Jerónimo Arenas-García. “Validation of Scientific Topic Models Using Graph Analysis and Corpus Metadata.” Scientometrics 127, no. 9 (2022): 5441–5458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04318-5.

Visengeriyeva, Larysa, and Ziawasch Abedjan. “Anatomy of Metadata for Data Curation.” Journal of Data and Information Quality 12, no. 3 (2020).

White, Hollie C., Leisa Gibbons, and Eileen Horansky. “Semantic Metadata as Meaning Making: Examining #hashtags and Collection Level Metadata.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 2:37–41, 2019.

Wickett, Karen M. “Metadata as a Site for Critical Inquiry.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 1–10, 2023.

Zhang, Guilan, Jian Wang, Jianping Liu, and Yao Pan. “Relationship between the Metadata and Relevance Criteria of Scientific Data.” Data Science Journal 20, no. 1 (2021): 1–21.