Faith-Based Justice: Understanding The Social Role Of Shrines And Pirs In Rural Sind, Pakistan

Main Article Content

Jamil Ahmed Sheikh

Abstract

The present paper designed to study social, spiritual and political contributions of Dargahs (shrines) and Pirs (spiritual leaders) in the development of faith-based justice in rural Sindh, Pakistan. Using the frameworks of the legal pluralism theory and social capital theory, it uses mixed-method approach that is, combining surveys and discussions, and focus groups to examine how the shrine-based mediation serves as an informal system of justice. The results indicate that the shrine-based resolution is believed to be accessible, effective, and based on the religious legitimacy. However, it is also an expression of larger social inequalities, with women, as well as the lower castes, frequently being excluded when it comes to making decisions. In addition to this, the shrine networks are also a source of political influence and Pirs are able to use their religious power to influence and mobilize their supporters as well as influence the electoral process. The participants also highlighted the emotional relief and moral reassurance that shrine spaces offered, which is in contrast to the remote and bureaucratic state courts. Despite the absence of any legal validation, the rulings of the Pirs possess binding force but with moral obligation and godly responsibility and pressure. In general, the paper emphasizes the role played by religious authority in supporting decentralized jurisdiction and social stability in the postcolonial rural setting.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Acemoglu, D., Cheema, A., Khawaja, A., & Robinson, J. (2019). Trust in State and Non-State Actors: Evidence from Dispute Resolution in Pakistan. Journal of Political Economy, 2.

Ahmed, J., Farooq, H. S., & Nazmeen, S (2022). Indigenous Dispute Resolution Mechanism (IDRM) in Sindh: A Case Study of Fatehpur Village, Larkana. UW journal of Social Sciences 5 (1), 205-221

Attaullah, Q. &. (2017). Tracing the concept of negotiation in law, pakistani legal system and sharī‘ah. Jihāt al-Islām , 11(1), 43-72.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.

Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.

Griffiths, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24), 1–55.

Jamal, A. (2015). Politics of piety in Pakistan: Islamic activism and women’s rights. Routledge.

Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290.

Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869–896.

Pennisi, E. (2011, 11 9). How Humans became Social. Retrieved from wired: Relis, T. (Janurary 2012). Sharing Experience in Access to Justice Engaging with Non-State Justice Systems & Conducting Assessments. UNDP. Bangkok, Thailand: Asia-Pacific Regional Centre, United Nations Development Programme.

Pfaff, J. (1999). Women and shrine culture: Gender, ritual, and the Sufi tradition. Anthropology of the Middle East, 4(1), 55–72.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Shaheed, F. (2004). Controlled or autonomous? Identity and the experience of women in Pakistan. Oxford University Press.

Warraich, S. (2017, December 24). The News on Sunday. Retrieved July 2022, from TNS: https://www.thenews.com.pk/tns/detail/564614-pirs-politicians-2

Weiss, A. (2014). Interpreting Islam, modernity, and women’s rights in Pakistan. Palgrave Macmillan.