KONTEN DAN KONSTRUK ASESMEN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR EVALUATIF PADA TEMA KARBOHIDRAT DALAM KIMIA PANGAN
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 26, 2020
Keywords:
evaluative thinking skills, assessment, carbohydrates in food chemistry
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to obtain an assessment that can be used to measure evaluative thinking skills on the theme of carbohydrates in food chemistry. This study uses a development model that consists of several stages, namely determining learning outcomes, establishing indicators of evaluative thinking, compiling items and assessment guidelines, conducting expert validation, and testing items on students. The test results obtained are scored according to the assessment guidelines. Expert validation was analyzed using Content Validity Ratio (CVR) to determine validity. Analysis of the test items using AnatesV4 to determine the reliability, and the level of difficulty of the questions. The results of the analysis of learning outcomes, carbohydrate material and literacy obtained 10 learning indicators and three indicators of evaluative thinking skills and 4 item description items. The CVR calculation result is 0.84 indicating that the instrument content is valid and can be used for data collection. The results of the trial of the instrument showed that all items were stated to be reliable with a value of 0.85, a very high category and the level of difficulty varied namely easy, medium and difficult. Based on the results of this study it can be concluded the items for evaluative thinking skills assessment on the theme of carbohydrates in food chemistry can be used because it has fulfilled the elements of the validity and reliability of the test.
Article Details
How to Cite
Sofia, S., Permanasari, A., Sholihin, H., & Supriyanti, F. M. T. (2020). KONTEN DAN KONSTRUK ASESMEN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR EVALUATIF PADA TEMA KARBOHIDRAT DALAM KIMIA PANGAN. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 4(1), 88-98. https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/orbital/article/view/5682
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Sofia, S., Permanasari, A., Sholihin, H., & Supriyanti, F. M. T. (2020). KONTEN DAN KONSTRUK ASESMEN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR EVALUATIF PADA TEMA KARBOHIDRAT DALAM KIMIA PANGAN. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 4(1), 88-98. https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/orbital/article/view/5682
References
Archibald, T & Buckley, J. (2012). Promoting Evaluative Thinking: A key ingredient in evaluation capacity. (online) (http://www.eers.org/sites/default/files/ Archibald_ Promoting Evaluative Thinking.pdf diakses 21 maret 2016)
Bennett, G., & Jessani, N. (2011). The knowledge translation toolkit: Bridging the know-do gap: A resource for researchers. IDRC.
Buckley, J, Archibald, T, Hargraves, M, Trochim, W.M. (2015). Defining and Teaching Evaluative Thinking: Insights From Research on Critical Thinking. American Journal of Evaluation, 36 (3) 1-14.
Davey, C. S. (2012). The Socratic Classroom Reflective Thinking Through Collabotive Thinking. AW Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Guilford, J.P. (1956). Fundamental Statistic in Psychology and Education. 3rd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
Lawshe, C.H.(1975. A Quqlitative Approach To Content Validity. Personal Psyxology, 28(4), 563-575
Nahum, T.L., Ben-Chaim, D., Azaiza, I., Herskovitz, O.,& Zoller, U. (2010). Does STES-oriented science education promote 10th-grade students’ decision-making capability? International Journal of Science Education. 32(10), 1315–1336.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Evaluation Flash Cards, Embedding Evaluative Thinking in Organizational Culture. St. Paul, Minnesota: Otto Bremer Foundation.
Politis, J & Houttz, J.C. (2015). Effects of Positive Mood on Generative and Evaluative Thinking in Creative Problem Solving. SAGE Open April-June 2015,5(2), 1– 8.
Sofia., Permanasari, A. Sholihin, H. & Supriyanti, F.M.T. (2019). Profile of food chemistry lectures in chemistry education program: Adescriptive study on the fulfillment of competency standards of chemistry teacher candidates. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1157 (4), 042039.
Wilson, F. R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. A. (2012). Recalculation of the Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45(3), 197–210.
Zoller, U. (2000). Interdisciplinary systemic HOCS development – the key for meaningful STES oriented chemical education. Chemistry Education: Research And Practice In Europe, 1 (2), 189-200.
________. (2011). From Teaching-to-Know-to-Learning-to-Think for Sustainability: What Should it Take? And How to Do it? Journal of Modern Education Review, 1(1), 34-40.
Bennett, G., & Jessani, N. (2011). The knowledge translation toolkit: Bridging the know-do gap: A resource for researchers. IDRC.
Buckley, J, Archibald, T, Hargraves, M, Trochim, W.M. (2015). Defining and Teaching Evaluative Thinking: Insights From Research on Critical Thinking. American Journal of Evaluation, 36 (3) 1-14.
Davey, C. S. (2012). The Socratic Classroom Reflective Thinking Through Collabotive Thinking. AW Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Guilford, J.P. (1956). Fundamental Statistic in Psychology and Education. 3rd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
Lawshe, C.H.(1975. A Quqlitative Approach To Content Validity. Personal Psyxology, 28(4), 563-575
Nahum, T.L., Ben-Chaim, D., Azaiza, I., Herskovitz, O.,& Zoller, U. (2010). Does STES-oriented science education promote 10th-grade students’ decision-making capability? International Journal of Science Education. 32(10), 1315–1336.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Evaluation Flash Cards, Embedding Evaluative Thinking in Organizational Culture. St. Paul, Minnesota: Otto Bremer Foundation.
Politis, J & Houttz, J.C. (2015). Effects of Positive Mood on Generative and Evaluative Thinking in Creative Problem Solving. SAGE Open April-June 2015,5(2), 1– 8.
Sofia., Permanasari, A. Sholihin, H. & Supriyanti, F.M.T. (2019). Profile of food chemistry lectures in chemistry education program: Adescriptive study on the fulfillment of competency standards of chemistry teacher candidates. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1157 (4), 042039.
Wilson, F. R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. A. (2012). Recalculation of the Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45(3), 197–210.
Zoller, U. (2000). Interdisciplinary systemic HOCS development – the key for meaningful STES oriented chemical education. Chemistry Education: Research And Practice In Europe, 1 (2), 189-200.
________. (2011). From Teaching-to-Know-to-Learning-to-Think for Sustainability: What Should it Take? And How to Do it? Journal of Modern Education Review, 1(1), 34-40.