The Effect of the Whole Group Discussion Learning Method on Students’ Learning Interest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19109/pairf.v7i3.28475Keywords:
Influence, Interest in Learning, FiqhAbstract
This study examines how to increase the learning interest of seventh-grade students in studying Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqih) using the Whole Group Discussion learning method, which shows that this method is effective in increasing students’ learning interest. This study uses a quantitative approach with a one group pretest posttest design to determine the differences in students’ learning interest before and after the implementation of the Whole Group Discussion method, which includes several stages, such as planning, implementation, and evaluation. The results of this study show that there is a significant difference between student’s learning interest at the pretest, with the results of the t-test hypothesis using paired sample test obtaining a significant value of 0.02 < 0.05. Based on the testing rules, if the sig. (2-tailed) value is < 0.05, then Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, so it can be concluded that there is a significant influence of the Whole Group Discussion learning method on students' learning interest in Fiqih subject for seventh-grade students. Thus, this study provides empirical evidence that the implementation of the Whole Group Discussion method can increase students’ learning interest in studying Fiqih, so this method can be used as an alternative to improve the quality of learning in schools. Based on the results of the research conducted by the researcher, it can be concluded that there is a significant influence of the Whole Group Discussion learning method on students' learning interest in Fiqih subjects for seventh-grade students, so teachers can consider this method in the learning procces to increase students, interest and engagement.
References
A’Yun, Neny Qurrota. “Perencanaan Pembelajaran Tematik Integratif Berbasis Lingkungan Hidup Pada Siswa Sd” 11, no. 01 (2016): 1–23.
Aeniyatul. “Bab iii metoda penelitian.” Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan 3 (2019): 1–9.
Anggara, Baldi. “Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Pendidikan Keagamaan Islam Anak Binaan Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Pakjo Palembang.” Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 3, no. 1 (2017): 162. doi:10.19109/tadrib.v3i1.1389.
Chen, C M, dan C H Wu. “Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance.” Computers & Education 80 (2015): 108–21. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.015.
Freeman, S, dan others. “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, no. 23 (2014): 8410–15. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
Ginting, Mitha Christina, dan Ivo Maelina Silitonga. “Pengaruh Pendanaan Dari Luar Perusahaan Dan Modal Sendiri Terhadap Tingkat Profitabilitas pada Perusahaan Property And Real Estate Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia.” Jurnal Manajemen 5, no. 2 (2019): 195–204.
Gokhale, A A. “Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking.” Journal of Technology Education 7, no. 1 (1995): 22–30. doi:10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2.
Hamzah, B Uno, dan Mohamad Nurdin. “Belajar dengan Pendekatan PAILKEM: Pembelajaran Aktif, Inovatif, Lingkungan, Kreatif, Efektif, Menarik.” Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2014.
Hipo, Sugiyono. “Ragam Dan Prosedur Tindakan Penelitian.” Ragam Dan Prosedur Tindakan Penelitian, 2015, 49–56.
Hmelo-Silver, C E. “Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?” Educational Psychology Review 16, no. 3 (2004): 235–66. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.
Indonesia, Republik. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Cet. VI;Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
Johnson, D W, R T Johnson, dan K A Smith. “Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory.” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 25, no. 3&4 (2014): 85–118.
Kosilah, dan Septian. “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Assure dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa.” Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian 1, no. 6 (2020): 79–87. doi:10.47492/jip.vli6.214.
Monicha, Ririn Eka, Lukman Asha, Asri Karolina, Eka Yanuarti, Maryamah Maryamah, Mardeli Mardeli, dan Nyayu Soraya. “Penanaman Nilai-Nilai Akhlak Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Menghadapi Era Milenialdi Sma Negeri 2 Rejang Lebong.” Tadrib 6, no. 2 (2021): 199–214. doi:10.19109/tadrib.v6i2.5925.
Prince, M. “Does active learning work? A review of the research.” Journal of Engineering Education 93, no. 3 (2004): 223–31. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.
Rohmadi. “Internalisasi Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Islam dalam Pelaksanaan Suscatin (Kursus Calon Pengantin) di Lembaga Kua Kecamatan Tulung Selapan Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ilir” 4, no. 2 (2022): 109–16. doi:10.19109/pairf.v4i2.10230.
Sani, Ridwan Abdullah. Inovasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2013.
Skor Hasil Penelitian Pretest dan posttest di SMP Negeri 3 Payaraman., n.d.
Slavin, R E. “Cooperative learning in elementary schools.” Education 3-13 43, no. 1 (2015): 5–14. doi:10.1080/03004279.2015.963370.
Soraya, Nyayu. “Analisis Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Kompetensi Dosen Dalam Mengajar Pada Program Studi Pai Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan Uin Raden Fatah Palembang.” Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 4, no. 1 (2018): 183–204. doi:10.19109/tadrib.v4i1.1957.
Sugiono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: CV alfa beta, 2016.
Sung, Y T, K E Chang, dan T C Liu. “The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis.” Computers & Education 94 (2016): 252–75. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008.
Susanti, Rosa. “penerapan pendekatan demonstrasi interaktif untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep fisika,” 2013, 19–29.
Syarnubi, Syarnubi. “Profesionalisme Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam Dalam Membentuk Religiusitas Siwsa Kelas IV di SDN 2 Pengayaran.” Tadrib 5, no. 1 (2019): 87–103. doi:10.19109/tadrib.v5i1.3230.
Syarnubi, Syarnubi, Muh Misdar, Abdullah Idi, Muhammad Isnaini, Mardeli Mardeli, dan Zulhijra Zulhijra. “Proses Pembelajaran Di Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam Fitk Uin Raden Fatah Palembang.” Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 3, no. 1 (2017): 53.
Tabel Uji Hipotesis, n.d.
Tamrin, Marwia, St Fatimah, S Sirate, dan Dan Muh Yusuf. “Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme Vygotsky dalam Pembelajaran Matematika.” Suara Intelektual Gaya Matematika. Vol. 3, 2011.
Usman, Basyaruddin. “Metodologi Pembelajaran Agama Islam.” Jakarta: Ciputat Pers, 2002.
Wirjayanti, F. “Pengertian Profesionalisme menurut para ahli.” Pengertian profesionalisme, 2000, 13–30.
Suara Intelektual Gaya Matematika. Vol.3, 2011.
Usman, Basyaruddin. 2002. Metodologi Pembelajaran Agama Islam, Jakarta: Ciputat pers.
Waruwu, Marinu, Siti Natijatul, Patrisia Rahayu Utami dan Elli Yanti. Metode Peneliti Kuantitatif: Konsep, Jenis, Tahapan dan Kelebihan 10 (2025): 917.
Wirjayanti, F. Pengertian Profesionalisme menurut para ahli. Pengertian Profesionalisme, 2000, 13-30. http://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/4068/3/BAB II.pdf.
.png){kind=logo}
1.png){kind=logo}
