KESOHIHAN AKIDAH DI LUAR EMPIRISME : MENJAWAB KRITIK GURU GEMBUL MELALUI METODE RASIONAL  DAN KAUSALITAS

Article Sidebar

Pdf
Published: Dec 25, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19109/el-fikr.v5i2.26416

Main Article Content

Bagus Kusumo Hadi
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Dewi Setia Wati
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Muhammad Alvin Saputra
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Abdul Qodir Zaelani
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Dino Gautman Raharjo Hadi
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Abstract

This study explores the critique of empiricism toward Islamic creed (akidah) as presented by Jafar Rohadi (known as Guru Gembul), who argues that faith, creed, and the concept of divinity are unscientific and subjective because they cannot be empirically proven. Guru Gembul's views on creed are framed as a product of secular epistemological hegemony, which limits knowledge to sensory experience. Through a qualitative-descriptive method based on literature review, this study compares the empiricist perspective with rational arguments from both Muslim and Western philosophers, such as Imam Al-Ghazali and Ramadhan Al-Buthi, who assert that scientific proof is not limited to empirical methods but also includes logic and causality. The study concludes that a rational approach is valid for scientifically proving the Islamic creed and that empiricism has limitations in explaining metaphysical reality. The implications of this research are to broaden the scope of scientific proof to encompass a rational understanding of Islamic creed and to enrich philosophical studies on faith within the context of scientific knowledge.
Keywords: Guru Gembul, creed (akidah), scientific proof, empirical method, rational method, causality, Islamic philosophy

Article Details

How to Cite
Hadi, Bagus Kusumo, Dewi Setia Wati, Muhammad Alvin Saputra, Abdul Qodir Zaelani, and Dino Gautman Raharjo Hadi. “KESOHIHAN AKIDAH DI LUAR EMPIRISME : MENJAWAB KRITIK GURU GEMBUL MELALUI METODE RASIONAL  DAN KAUSALITAS”. EL-FIKR: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam 5, no. 2 (December 25, 2024): 155–178. Accessed April 15, 2025. https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/elfikr/article/view/26416.
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): El-Fikr: Jurnal Aqidah Dan Filsafat Islam
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

How to Cite

Hadi, Bagus Kusumo, Dewi Setia Wati, Muhammad Alvin Saputra, Abdul Qodir Zaelani, and Dino Gautman Raharjo Hadi. “KESOHIHAN AKIDAH DI LUAR EMPIRISME : MENJAWAB KRITIK GURU GEMBUL MELALUI METODE RASIONAL  DAN KAUSALITAS”. EL-FIKR: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam 5, no. 2 (December 25, 2024): 155–178. Accessed April 15, 2025. https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/elfikr/article/view/26416.

References

(t.t.), Imam Al-Ghazali., Tahafut Al-Falasifah. Diterjemahkan Oleh Marmura, Michael. (Brigham Young University Press.)

Abu Hamid Muhammad ibn Muhammad, A.-G., Ihya’ Ulum Al-Din: (Vol. jilid 1. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah (2005).)

Al-Attas, S. M. N., Islam and Secularism. (ABIM. (1978))

Al-Buthi, Muhammad Said Ramadhan, Kubral Yaqiniyyat Al-Kauniyyah. (Dar al-Fikr al-Mu’ashir.(1999a).)

Al-Ghazali., Tahafut Al-Falasifah. (Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. (1997a).)

Al-Ghazali, A. H., Al-Mustashfa Min ’Ilm Al-Ushul. (Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. (1997).)

Al-Qur’an, An-Nahl 16:125, Dalam Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahannya (Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2019). Kementerian Agama RI.)

Al-Razi, Fakhruddin, Mafatih Al-Ghayb (Al-Tafsir Al-Kabir), Vol. Juz 1 (Dar al-Ma’arif.(1999b).)

Al-Tayyib, Ahmad, ‘Kuliah Dan Pengajian Tentang Akidah Di Al-Azhar: Kajian Tafsir Ayat-Ayat Tauhid.’ (Pusat Pengkajian Islam dan Filsafat. Al-Azhar University (2018).)

Descartes, René, Meditations on First Philosophy (Publishing Company Meditasi Ketiga (1993a).)

‘Diskusi Guru Gembul Mengenai Akidah Dan Metode Ilmiah, Diakses Dari Kanal Media Sosial Terkait Pada Tahun 2023. (t.T)’ ([Broadcast].)

Fakhruddin, A.-R., Mafatih Al-Ghaib, Vol. jilid (Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi. (1981).)

homas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, ‘Dalam F.C. Copleston, A History of Philosophy Medieval Philosophy’, Vol. Volum (Image Books.(1993b).)

Hume, David, John Noon: A Treatise of Human Nature., Vol. Bagia ((1739).)

Ibrahim bin Muhammad, A.-B, Tuhfat Al-Murid ‘ala Jauharat Al-Tauhid (Vol. jilid 1. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.(2004).)

Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. (Vol. Bagian II. Thomas Kingsmill Abbott. University Press.(1997b).)

Majid., Fakhry, Islamic Philosophy, Theology, and Mysticism. (Columbia University Press. (2000))

Muhammad bin Abdul Karim, A.-S., Al-Milal Wa Al-Nihal (Vol. jilid 1. Dar al-Ma’rifah. (1992).)

Nasr, S. H., Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the Land of Prophecy. (State University of New York Press. (2006).)

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein, Science and Civilization in Islam. (Harvard University Press. (1968).)

Newton, I., Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, Translated by Andrew Motte, Edited by Florian Cajori. (University of California Press.(1934).)

RI, Kementerian Agama, Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahannya (Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia.(2019).)

Sadra, Mulla., The Transcendent Philosophy of Mulla Sadra Diterjemahkan Oleh Chittick, William C. (Islamic Texts Society.(1992).)

Sina, Ibnu, Dalil Burhan (Bukti Rasional): Dalam Karyanya Al-Isharat Wa Al-Tanbihat, Vol. Jilid (Dar al-Ma’rifah.(1985))

Taimiyyah, Ibnu, Majmu’ Al-Fatawa (Vol. Jilid 9. Dar al-Wafa.(1998))