Public Perception and Digital Pressure on Regional Heads: The Melki Laka Lena Phenomenon
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The transformation of political communication in the digital era has shifted regional leaders from operating solely within bureaucratic structures to navigating rapidly evolving public perceptions shaped by social media. This article examines the dynamics of public perception toward Melki Laka Lena as the Governor of East Nusa Tenggara by employing three main frameworks: media logic to understand how political communication becomes increasingly symbolic and easily circulated, affective publics to explain the role of emotions, satire, and public disappointment in digital conversations, and network society to analyze how meanings of leadership are reproduced through digital user networks. This study uses a qualitative case study approach through textual-multimodal reading and digital discourse analysis of social media posts, screenshots of public conversations, and comment sections. The findings reveal that public perception is shaped more by communication symbols, visual representations, collective emotions, and online interactions than by substantive discussions of government policies. Social media has ultimately evolved into a space where digital pressure and public perception toward regional leaders are continuously constructed.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
References
Altheide, D. L. (2004). Media logic and political communication. Political Communication, 21(3), 293–296.
Brady, W. J., McLoughlin, K., Doan, T. N., & Crockett, M. J. (2021). How social learning amplifies moral outrage expression in online social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(33).
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2023). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(3), 1–12.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
Humprecht, E., Esser, F., & Van Aelst, P. (2023). Emotionalized social media environments and populism. New Media & Society, 25(4), 1–20.
Johansson, E., & Johansson, K. M. (2023). Government communication in the digital era: Social media adaptation and strategic complementarity. Government Information Quarterly, 40(2), 101798.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of network media logic in social media. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1241–1257.
Mazzoleni, G. (2014). Mediatization and political populism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
Riedl, M. J., Lukito, J., & Woolley, S. C. (2023). Political influencers and the hybrid media environment. Social Media + Society, 9(2), 1–14.
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world.