Repositioning Actor Network Theory in Digital Communication Studies: A Conceptual Explication through Digital Activism

Main Article Content

Nurly Meilinda
Harry Yog Sunandar
Karerek
Galih Priambodo

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi komunikasi digital telah mengubah cara individu dan kelompok melakukan aktivisme melalui berbagai platform media sosial. Namun, sebagian besar kajian aktivisme digital masih didominasi oleh perspektif yang berpusat pada manusia sehingga peran teknologi sering diposisikan sebagai medium pasif. Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis dan mereposisikan Actor Network Theory (ANT) dalam kajian komunikasi digital dengan menelaah relevansinya untuk memahami aktivisme digital. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan eksplikasi konseptual melalui analisis terhadap konsep-konsep utama ANT, seperti aktor, jaringan, dan translasi, serta keterkaitannya dengan praktik aktivisme digital. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa aktivisme digital tidak hanya dibentuk oleh aktor manusia, seperti aktivis dan audiens, tetapi juga oleh aktor nonmanusia, seperti platform media sosial, algoritma, hashtag, dan perangkat digital yang turut memengaruhi proses mobilisasi, penyebaran informasi, dan partisipasi publik. Artikel ini berkontribusi dalam memperkuat posisi ANT sebagai kerangka analitis yang relevan untuk menjelaskan distribusi agensi dalam praktik komunikasi digital kontemporer.

Article Details

How to Cite
Meilinda, N., Harry Yog Sunandar, Karerek, & Galih Priambodo. (2025). Repositioning Actor Network Theory in Digital Communication Studies: A Conceptual Explication through Digital Activism. Jurnal Studi Sosial Dan Politik, 9(2), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.19109/jssp.v9i2.36031
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Meilinda, N., Harry Yog Sunandar, Karerek, & Galih Priambodo. (2025). Repositioning Actor Network Theory in Digital Communication Studies: A Conceptual Explication through Digital Activism. Jurnal Studi Sosial Dan Politik, 9(2), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.19109/jssp.v9i2.36031

References

Ambardi, Kuskrido. 2014. Mapping Digital Media: Indonesia Country Report. Open Society Foundations

Anne Kaun, Julie Uldam. 2018. Digital Activism: After the Hype. Journal New Media & Society Vol.20 No.6

Bakardjieva, M. 2016. Mundane Citizenship: New Media and Civil Society in Bulgaria. In New Media in New Europe-Asia. Taylor and Francis Inc.

Barassi, Veronica. 2017. “Digital Citizens? Data Traces and Family Life.” Contemporary Social Science 12 (1–2): 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2017. 1338353.

Benzecry, C., Krause, M., Reed,I. 2017. Social Theory Now. The University of Chicago Press

Bülow, Marisa von, Luiz Vilaça, and Pedro Henrique Abelin. 2019. “Varieties of Digital Activist Practices: Students and Mobilization in Chile.” Information Communication and Society 22 (12): 1770–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1451550.

Castell, Manuel. 2000. The Rise of The Network Society, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell

Castell, Manuel. 2015. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in The Internet Age 2nd ed. Polity Press

Cole, Kristen & Littlejohn, Stephen W. 2018. Translating Moral Orders: putting moral conflict theory in conversayion with actor-network theory. Review of Communication. Routledge

Couldry, Nick. 2004. Theorising Media as Practice. Social Semiotics,14(2).115-132

Craig, Robert T. & Muller, Heidi L. (2007) Theorizing Communication: Readings Across Traditions. London: Sage

Dean, Jodi. 2003. Why the Net is not a Public Sphere. Journal of Constellations Vol.10 No.1

Graham Harman. 2009. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne, Australia: Re.press

Latour, Bruno. 1990. On actor-network theory. A few clarifications plus more than a few compilations. Philosophia 25(3) p.47-64

Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Littlejohn, Stephen W, Foss, Karen A., Oetzel John J. (2017) Theories of Human Communication. 11th Edition. Belmont: Waveland Press, Inc

Nitschke, Paula, Patrick Donges, and Henriette Schade. 2014. “Political Organizations’ Use of Websites and Facebook.” New Media and Society 18 (5): 744–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814546451.

Nugroho, Yanuar. 2008. Adopting Technology, Transforming Society: The internet and the reshaping of civil society activism in Indonesia. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Society. Vol.06 No.2 pp:77-105

Nugroho, Yanuar. 2010. Citizen in @ction. Collaboration participatory democracy and freedom of information. Mapping contemporary civic activism and the use of new social media in Indonesia. Research Project Report. Manchester Institute of Innovation Research

Oser, Jennifer, Marc Hooghe, Sofie Marien, Jennifer Oser, Marc Hooghe, and Sofie Marien. 2013. Is Online Participation Distinct from Offline Participation ? A Latent Class Analysis of Participation Types And. 66 (1): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912436695.

Pink et al. 2016. Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practices. London:Sage

Rogers, Everett M. 1997. A History of Communication Study.- A Biographycal Approach. NewYork: The Free Press

Schramm, Wilbur. 1972. The Nature of Communication Between Humans in Schramm, W. 3-61

Schmitz, Hans Peter, J. Michael Dedmon, Tosca Bruno-van Vijfeijken, and Jaclyn Mahoney. 2020. “Democratizing Advocacy?: How Digital Tools Shape International Non-Governmental Activism.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 17 (2): 174–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1710643.

Wacker, J. 1998. A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361-385.

Yang, Guobin. 2009. The Power of Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online. New York: Columbia University Press

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.