Tracking the Deadlock of the Struggle on Inclusive Citizenship Study of the Disability Movement in DIY Province
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 30, 2020
Keywords:
Keywords: Strukturasi; Inclusive Citizenship; Disability; Disability Movement
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
Inclusive citizenship is currently being fought for by groups that care about vulnerable groups. In Indonesia the ideals of inclusive citizenship are also fought for persons with disabilities. So far, persons with disabilities have become excluded social groups. The disability movement is intensely voicing inclusive citizenship through the struggle to form regulations that can bring changes to the lives of persons with disabilities, starting from the CRPD Convention, the Disability Persons Act, then local regulation of Disabilities. This paper will use the concept of structuration Giddens and confronting the disability movement in fighting for inclusive citizenship with efforts from the government to capture the issue of inclusive citizenship. The Disability Movement in Yogyakarta Province is a model of the movement that has succeeded in fighting for regional regulations for persons with disabilities. This movement was considered successful when the national movement struggled for the Law on Persons with Disabilities experiencing a deadlock, but in the process the disability movement has not been able to process the issue of inclusive citizenship in its struggle, and the local government as if it does not understand what the disability movement is trying to achieve. Instead of make realize the ideals of inclusive citizenship, the Disability Movement is trapped in an exclusive movement model. The Movement Model in DIY Province is an example in the struggle for inclusive citizenship which was initially considered successful but later suffered a deadlock.
Inclusive citizenship is currently being fought for by groups that care about vulnerable groups. In Indonesia the ideals of inclusive citizenship are also fought for persons with disabilities. So far, persons with disabilities have become excluded social groups. The disability movement is intensely voicing inclusive citizenship through the struggle to form regulations that can bring changes to the lives of persons with disabilities, starting from the CRPD Convention, the Disability Persons Act, then local regulation of Disabilities. This paper will use the concept of structuration Giddens and confronting the disability movement in fighting for inclusive citizenship with efforts from the government to capture the issue of inclusive citizenship. The Disability Movement in Yogyakarta Province is a model of the movement that has succeeded in fighting for regional regulations for persons with disabilities. This movement was considered successful when the national movement struggled for the Law on Persons with Disabilities experiencing a deadlock, but in the process the disability movement has not been able to process the issue of inclusive citizenship in its struggle, and the local government as if it does not understand what the disability movement is trying to achieve. Instead of make realize the ideals of inclusive citizenship, the Disability Movement is trapped in an exclusive movement model. The Movement Model in DIY Province is an example in the struggle for inclusive citizenship which was initially considered successful but later suffered a deadlock.
Article Details
How to Cite
Yulianti, I. (2020). Tracking the Deadlock of the Struggle on Inclusive Citizenship Study of the Disability Movement in DIY Province. Jurnal Studi Sosial Dan Politik, 4(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.19109/jssp.v4i1.4605
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Yulianti, I. (2020). Tracking the Deadlock of the Struggle on Inclusive Citizenship Study of the Disability Movement in DIY Province. Jurnal Studi Sosial Dan Politik, 4(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.19109/jssp.v4i1.4605
References
Daftar Pustaka
1. Buku, Jurnal, dan Makalah
Angharad E. Beckett, Citizenship and Vulnerability, Dissability and Issues of Social and Political Engagement, (Palgrave Macmillan, 2006)
Carson, Grant. “The Social Model of Disability,” Scottish Information Forum (SAIF), 2009. http://www.dpiap.org/resources/pdf/Social_Model_Disability_2011_04_22.pdf
Dara Z. Strolovitch, Affirmative Advokasi, Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics, The University Of Chicago Press, 2007
Fuad, Bahrul. “Revitalisasi Gerakan Difabel.” Jurnal Perempuan 69 (2011).
Giddens, Anthony. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan, 1979.
———. Teori Strukturasi, Dasar-Dasar Pembentukan Struktur Sosial Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.
———. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.
Irwanto, Prof, and Eva Kasim. “Analisis Situasi Penyandang Disabilitas Di Indonesia: Sebuah Desk Review.” Pusat Kajian Disabilitas, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik UI, 2010.
Lister, Ruth. “Inclusive Citizenship, Gender and Poverty: Some Implications for Education for Citizenship.” Loughborough University, Citizenship Teaching and Learning 4, no. 1 (2008)
Moeloeng, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2004.
Nugroho, Yanuar. “Bergerak Di Akar Rumput,” 2002.
Purwanta, Setya Adi. “Memecah Ketakutan Menjadi Kekuatan.” In Kisah-Kisah Advokasi Di Indonesia, Maret. Insist Press, 2002.
Ritzer, George, and Douglas J Goodman. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Edited by Alimandan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2007.
2. Wawancara
Wawancara dengan Dr.Rofah, Ketua Pusat Studi Layanan Difabel, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Penyususn Naskah Akademis Raperda Penyandang Disabilitas, 21 Maret 2016, di UIN Yogyakarta.
Wawancara dengan Nurul Saadah, Direktur Sentra Advokasi Perempuan dan Anak Disabilitas (SAPDA), 25 April 2016, Pukul 13.00 di Kantor SAPDA.
Wawancara dengan Nuning Suryatiningsih, Direktur Ciqal (Centre for Improving Qualified Activity People with Dissabilities), tanggal 11 Desember 2015, Pukul 13,00 di Kantor Ciqal.
Wawancara dengan Setya Adi Purwanta, 30 Desember 2015, pukul 10.00 di Kantor Driya Manunggal.
3. Website
www.komnasham.go.id
1. Buku, Jurnal, dan Makalah
Angharad E. Beckett, Citizenship and Vulnerability, Dissability and Issues of Social and Political Engagement, (Palgrave Macmillan, 2006)
Carson, Grant. “The Social Model of Disability,” Scottish Information Forum (SAIF), 2009. http://www.dpiap.org/resources/pdf/Social_Model_Disability_2011_04_22.pdf
Dara Z. Strolovitch, Affirmative Advokasi, Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics, The University Of Chicago Press, 2007
Fuad, Bahrul. “Revitalisasi Gerakan Difabel.” Jurnal Perempuan 69 (2011).
Giddens, Anthony. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan, 1979.
———. Teori Strukturasi, Dasar-Dasar Pembentukan Struktur Sosial Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.
———. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.
Irwanto, Prof, and Eva Kasim. “Analisis Situasi Penyandang Disabilitas Di Indonesia: Sebuah Desk Review.” Pusat Kajian Disabilitas, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik UI, 2010.
Lister, Ruth. “Inclusive Citizenship, Gender and Poverty: Some Implications for Education for Citizenship.” Loughborough University, Citizenship Teaching and Learning 4, no. 1 (2008)
Moeloeng, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2004.
Nugroho, Yanuar. “Bergerak Di Akar Rumput,” 2002.
Purwanta, Setya Adi. “Memecah Ketakutan Menjadi Kekuatan.” In Kisah-Kisah Advokasi Di Indonesia, Maret. Insist Press, 2002.
Ritzer, George, and Douglas J Goodman. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Edited by Alimandan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2007.
2. Wawancara
Wawancara dengan Dr.Rofah, Ketua Pusat Studi Layanan Difabel, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Penyususn Naskah Akademis Raperda Penyandang Disabilitas, 21 Maret 2016, di UIN Yogyakarta.
Wawancara dengan Nurul Saadah, Direktur Sentra Advokasi Perempuan dan Anak Disabilitas (SAPDA), 25 April 2016, Pukul 13.00 di Kantor SAPDA.
Wawancara dengan Nuning Suryatiningsih, Direktur Ciqal (Centre for Improving Qualified Activity People with Dissabilities), tanggal 11 Desember 2015, Pukul 13,00 di Kantor Ciqal.
Wawancara dengan Setya Adi Purwanta, 30 Desember 2015, pukul 10.00 di Kantor Driya Manunggal.
3. Website
www.komnasham.go.id