Evaluation of Circulation Service Quality Using Libqual+Tm Method at Library of Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to find out and evaluate the quality of circulation services based on user perceptions, as well as identify service dimensions that need to be maintained, improved, or improved in the library of library of Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Indonesia. By using a quantitative descriptive. The results of the study show that overall, the quality of circulation services at the Library of Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Indonesia is quite good. Nevertheless, there is a gap between the expected services and the services received. The Affect of Service dimension obtained a relatively high score, indicating a fairly satisfactory performance of librarians. Meanwhile, the dimensions of Information Control and Library as Place show results that are still below the expectations of users and it is suggested that the academic library increase the number and quality of human resources in the circulation section, update and add to the collection according to the needs of the study program, and improve facilities and infrastructure, especially the internet network and other service support facilities. This research is expected to be useful to add literature and scientific references related to the evaluation of the quality of library services, especially circulation services using the LibQual+ ™ method approach and can be used as a basis for improving circulation services in the academic library and other universities if they feel that they are experiencing similar things so that they can improve professionalism in providing services.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
How to Cite
References
Al-Baihaqi, M. (2025). Evaluasi Kualitas Layanan Perpustakaan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Libqual+TM (Studi Kasus Pada Perpustakaan Iain Zawiyah Cot Kala Langsa). https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/42364
Dewi, N. I. (2018). Efektivitas Layanan Sirkulasi Melalui Sistem Layanan Mandiri. https://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/162117
Fransisca, R. (2015). Survei Peningkatan Mutu Berkelanjutan Melalui Pemantauan dan Pengukuran Kepuasan Pemustaka. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, XI, 16–23. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/bip/article/view/10031
Kaapu, N. H., & Zimu-Biyela, A. N. (2025). Using LibQUAL to assess user satisfaction with library services at the Aloe Park South African Police Service (SAPS) National Library, Pretoria, South Africa. Library Management. DOI 10.1108/LM-11-2024-0121
Masruri, A. (2023). Perpustakaan Sebagai Public Relations dalam Mendukung Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi. Journal of Information and Library Review, 1(1). DOI 10.61540/jilr.v1i1.27
Oyedokun, T. T. (2025). Navigating the dynamics of present-day academic libraries: An in-depth analysis of strategies, challenges, and emerging trends. IFLA Journal, 51(2), 470-489. DOI 10.1177/03400352241291907
Rahayuningsih, S. (2019). Pengaruh Motivasi Dan Kepuasan. Kerja Terhadap Kinerja. Jurnal Investasi. DOI 10.31943/investasi.v5i2.28
Sayekti, R., Aditya, M., Simahate, T., & Devianty, R. (2022). An assessment of information control: Understanding library service quality from users’ perspectives. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 17(2), 88-108. DOI 10.18438/eblip29916
Syahrizal, H., & Jailani, M. S. (2023). Jenis-jenis penelitian dalam penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Humaniora, 1(1), 13-23. DOI 10.61104/jq.v1i1.49
Wicaksono, M. F. (2018). Membandingkan Kompetensi Pustakawan Pendidikan dengan Pustakawan Pelatihan di Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Jurnal Ilmu Informasi, Perpustakaan, Dan Kearsipan. Jurnal Ilmu Informasi, Perpustakaan Dan Kearsipan, 20(2). DOI 10.7454/JIPK.v20i2.003