TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION IN NEWS ITEM TEXT BY USING FACTS QUESTIONS RESPONSES STRATEGY

Retna Handayani

Abstract


The objectives of this study were to find out whether or not there was a significant improvement on the tenth grade students’ news item reading before and after the treatment and to find out whether or not there was a significant difference on the tenth grade students’ news item reading between those who were taught by using Facts Questions Responses strategy and those who were. This study used pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design. The sample of the study was selected by using convenience sampling method. There were 70 students taken as sample. In collecting the data, test was used. The test was given twice to both experimental and control groups as a pretest and posttest. To verify the hypotheses, the score data between pretest and posttest in experimental groups were analyzed by using paired sample t-test. In paired sample t-test, the level of significance was 0.000 which was lower than 0.05 and t-value 8.304 was higher than t-table with df=34 (2.032). Then, the score data between posttest in experimental and control groups were analyzed by using independent sample t-test. In independent sample t-test, the level of significance was 0.028 which was lower than 0.05 and the t-value 2.243 which was higher than t-table with df =68 (1.995). It means that teaching reading comprehension in news item text by using FQR strategy had significant effect on the students’ reading comprehension achievement.


Keywords


facts questions responses strategy, news item text, reading comprehension

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alyousef, S. H. (2005). Teaching reading comprehension to ESL/EFL learners. Journal of language and learning, 5(2), 144. Retrieved from http://www. Ccsenet .org/ journ al/index.php/ass/.../1413

Brassell, D., & Rasinski, T. (2008). Comprehension that works: Taking students beyond ordinary understanding to deep comprehension. Hungtington Beach, CA: Shell Education.

Buehl, D. (2007). The reading room: FQR charts. On WEAC. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Education Association Council. Retrieved from http://www/weach.org/News/200607/march07/readingroommarch07.htm

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (2006). KTSP (Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan). Jakarta, Indonesia: Pusta Penilitian Pendidikan.

Dorfman, R. L., & Cappelli, R. (2009). Nonfiction mentor texts. Portland, OR: Stenhouse Publishers.

Duffy, G. G. (2009). Explaning reading a resource for teaching concepts, skills, and strategies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.

Fogelberg, E., Skalinder, C., Satz, P., Hiller, B., Bernstein, L., & Vitantonio, s. (2008). Integrating literacy and math: Strategies for K-6 teacher. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1995). Making sense of functional grammar. Sydney: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.

Griek, V. L. (2010). Determining importance in text: The nonfiction connection. E-journal of staff development plannning sheet. Retrieved from http://www.ltl.state.edu/staff_devel2010/determiningimportance.htm

Hamra, A., & Syatriana, E. (2010). Developing a model of teaching reading comprehension for efl students. TEFLIN Journal, 21(1), 27. Retrieved from http://journal.teflin.org/index.php/journal/article/download/31/33.

Harvey, M. (2012). Reading comprehension strategies for elementary and secondary school students. Lynchburg, VA: Lynchburg College Publisher.

Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2007). Strategies that work: Taeaching comprehension for understanding and engagement (2nd ed.). Maine, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.

Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Boardman, A. (2015). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning difficulties (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Lems, K., Miller, L. D., & Soro, M. T. (2010). Teaching reading to English language learners: Insights from linguistics. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Linse, C. T. (2005). Practical English language teachings: Young learners. Singapore: McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.

Mukminin, A., Muazza, Hustarna, & Sari, S.R. (2015). Stories from the frontlines: In-service teachers’ demotivating factors and policy recommendations. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 1(2), 40‐52. DOI: 10.17985/ijare.56085

Mukminin, A., Ali, Rd. M., & Fadloan, M.J. (2015). Voices from Within: Student Teachers’ Experiences in English Academic Writing Socialization at One Indonesian Teacher Training Program. The Qualitative Report, 20 (9), 1394-1407.

Nunan, D. (2003). Pratical English language teahing. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Priyana, J., Riandi, & Mumpuni, A. P. (2008). Interlanguage: English for senior high school students X science and social study programme: SMA/MA Kelas X IPA/IPS. Jakarta, Indonesia: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Sudarwati, M., & Grace, E. (2007). Look ahead an English course1. Jakarta, Indonesia: Erlangga.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office:
State Islamic University of Raden Fatah Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia.
Prof.K.H. Zainal Abidin Fikri Street Number 1, Palembang, South Sumatra
Email: edukasi@radenfatah.ac.id
Website: http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/edukasi/index


Creative Commons Licence

Edukasi by http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/edukasi/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

INDEXED by: