Teacher Methods in Teaching Arabic: A Case Study of One Senior High School in Jambi City

  • Mohamad Muspawi Jambi University
  • Zainul Arifin STAI Maarif Jambi
  • Fathin Nadila Jambi University
Keywords: methods, teachers, Arabic vocabulary

Abstract

This research was conducted in one state senior high school in Jambi city aiming to get the whole picture about the methods of teachers in teaching Arabic vocabulary. We used a qualitative study with a case study approach. The participants of this research were teachers who taught Arabic vocabulary. The data were collected through interviews, documentation, and observation. The results showed that the methods used by the teachers in teaching Arabic vocabulary were mostly lecturing and demonstration. The obstacles faced by the teachers in Arabic vocabulary teaching were covered in several points namely, limited time allocation, teacher education background, infrastructure and lack of student interest in religious learning and expanding Arabic knowledge. We also presented the efforts by teachers to overcome the obstacles such as to motivate the students by telling them the importance of Arabic in international community as one of international students, to give practice tasks implementation, to sustainable evaluation and task.

Author Biography

Mohamad Muspawi, Jambi University
Mohmad muspawi is a lecturer of Jambi university teaching in the faculty of Education and teacher training

References

Arsyad, A. (2004). Bahasa Arab dan metode pengajarannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Christensen, L., & Johnson, B. (2008). Education research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approach. New York, NY: Sage.
Coleman, J.A. (2004). Modern languages in British universities. Arts and Humanitie,s 3(2), 147-162.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Effendy, & Fuad, A. (2005). Metodologi pengajaran bahasa Arab. Malang: Misykat.
Fachrurozzi, Aziz, & Mahyuddin, E. (1994). Teknik pembelajaran bahasa Arab. Bandung: Angkasa
Faisal, S. (1990). Penelitian kualitatif dasar-dasar dan aplikasinya. Malang: YA3.
Hadi, A., & Haryono.(1998). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Hermawan, A. (2013). Metodologi pembelajaran bahasa Arab. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Henry, A. (2011). Examining the impact of L2 English on L3 selves: A case study. International Journal ofMultilingualism, 8, 235–255.
Izzan, A. (2009). Bahasa Arab dan metode pengajarannya, Bandung: Humaniora.
Lamb, M. (2004). Integrative motivation in a globalizing world. System, 32 (1), 3–19.
Mercer, S. (2011). Towards an understanding of language learner self-concept. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodelogi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.
Mukminin. A. (2012). Acculturative experiences among Indonesian graduate students in US higher education: academic shock, adjustment, crisis, and resolution. Excellence in Higher Education Journal, 3 (1), 14-36.
Mukminin, A., Ali, Rd. M., & Fadloan, M.J. (2015). Voices from Within: Student Teachers’ Experiences in English Academic Writing Socialization at One Indonesian Teacher Training Program. The Qualitative Report, 20 (9), 1394-1407.
Mukminin, A., Kamil, D., Muazza, M., & Haryanto, E. (2017). Why teacher education? Documenting undocumented female student teachers’ motives in Indonesia: A case study. The Qualitative Report, 22(1), 309-326.
Mukminin, A., Haryanto, E., Makmur, Failasofah, Fajaryani, N., Thabran, Y., & Suyadi. (2013). The achievement ideology and top-down national standardized exam policy in Indonesia: Voices from local English teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 4(4), 19-38.
Mukminin, A., & McMahon, B.J. (2013). International Graduate Students’ Cross-Cultural Academic Engagement: Stories of Indonesian Doctoral Students on American Campus. The Qualitative Report, 18 (69), 1-19.
Mukminin, A., Muazza, Hustarna, & Sari, S.R. (2015). Stories from the frontlines: In-service teachers’ demotivating factors and policy recommendations. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 1(2), 40‐52. DOI: 10.17985/ijare.56085
Muna, W. A. (2011). Metodologi pembelajaran bahasa arab, teori dan aplikasi, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Teras.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Prasojo, L. D., Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Muhaimin, Ikhsan, & Saudagar, F. (2017). Managing Digital Learning Environments: Student Teachers’ Perception on the Social Networking Services Use in Writing Courses in Teacher Education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16 (4), 42-55.
Pujolar, J., & Puigdevall, M. (2015). Linguistic mudes: How to become a new speaker in Catalonia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 231, 167–187.
Rosyidi, A. W. (2009). Media pembelajaran bahasa Arab. Malang: UIN Malang Pres.
Ushioda, E. (2006). Language motivation in a reconfigured Europe: access, identity, autonomy. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 27 ( 2), 148–61.
Wiley, T., & García, O. (2016). Language policy and planning in language education: Legacies, consequences, and possibilities. Modern Language Journal, 100 (Supplement 2016), 48–63.
Zaenal, M., (2011). Strategi dan metode pembelajaran, 2nd ed, Pekalongan: STAIN Pekalongan Press.
Published
25-12-2017
How to Cite
Muspawi, M., Arifin, Z., & Nadila, F. (2017). Teacher Methods in Teaching Arabic: A Case Study of One Senior High School in Jambi City. Ta’dib: Journal of Islamic Education (Jurnal Pendidikan Islam), 22(1), 58-68. Retrieved from http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/tadib/article/view/1620
Section
Article