Female Students' Mathematical Argumentation Ability Based on Self-Efficacy Level

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jun 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19109/jpmrafa.v10i1.20593
Keywords:
Mathematical Argumentation, Self-Efficacy, Mathematics Education

Main Article Content

Gurit Wulan Jagadianti
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Pradnyo Wijayanti
Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the mathematical argumentation abilities of female students based on their levels of self-efficacy. Mathematical argumentation is crucial in math education for mastering concepts and developing higher-order thinking skills. Self-efficacy relates to an individual's confidence in completing math tasks, including argumentation The research employs a quantitative approach, collecting data from 36 students in the Mathematics Education Program. Data was gathered through a self-efficacy questionnaire and math tasks related to statistics that assess students' mathematical argumentation. The findings indicate that mathematical argumentation abilities vary across different levels of self-efficacy. . Students with high self-efficacy do not always have strong mathematical arguments, and vice versa. The level of self-efficacy in students does not determine the strength of the mathematical arguments presented by students.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jagadianti, G. W., & Wijayanti, P. (2024). Female Students’ Mathematical Argumentation Ability Based on Self-Efficacy Level. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 10(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.19109/jpmrafa.v10i1.20593
Issue
Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA
Section
Artikel
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The requirements that must be met by the author are as follows:

  1. The author saves the copyright and gives the journal simultaneously with the license  under Creative Commons Attribution License which permits other people to share the work by stating that it is firstly published in this journal.
  2. The author can post their work in an institutional repository or publish it in a book by by stating that it is firstly published in this journal.
  3. The author is allowed to post their work online (for instance, in an institutional repository or their own website) before and during the process of delivery. (see Open Access Effect).

How to Cite

Jagadianti, G. W., & Wijayanti, P. (2024). Female Students’ Mathematical Argumentation Ability Based on Self-Efficacy Level. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 10(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.19109/jpmrafa.v10i1.20593

References

Afifah, S. N., & Kusuma, A. B. (2021). Pentingnya Kemampuan Self-Efficacy Matematis Serta Berpikir Kritis Pada Pembelajaran Daring Matematika. In Mathematic Education Journal)Mathedu, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.37081/mathedu.v4i2.2642

‘Aini, L. Q. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Ditinjau Dari Self-Efficacy Siswa Smp Kelas Vii. Jurnal E-Dumath, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.52657/je.v6i1.1162

Amar, M. F. (2024). Peran Kemampuan Komunikasi Interpersonal Pendidik Dalam Menumbuhkan Self-Efficacy. Aafiyah: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 2(01), 1-13.

Ananda, E. R., & Wandini, R. R. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Ditinjau Dari Self Efficacy Siswa. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(5), 5113–5126. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i5.2659

Annisa, F. N., Nuraida, I., & Komala, C. (2024, May). Pengaruh Self Efficacy Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mata Kuliah Teori Grup Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika. In Gunung Djati Conference Series (Vol. 41, pp. 71-81).

Arifin, M. Z., Sudirman, & Rahardi, R. (2023). Struktur Argumentasi Mahasiswa Dalam Pembuktian Sifat Ketertutupan Suatu Grup. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 07(03), 2703–2714. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2534

Babys, U. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Siswa Ditinjau Dari Gender. Anargya: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.24176/anargya.v3i1.4771

Bandura, A. (1994). Encyclopedia Of Mental Health (Vol. 4). Academic Press.

Bandura, A., Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales, 5, 307-37.

Damer, T. (2008). Attacking faulty reasoning: A practical guide to fallacy-free arguments. Nelson Education.

Dogan, M. F. (2022). Pre-Service Teachers’ Criteria For Evaluating Mathematical Arguments That Include Generic Examples. International Journal Of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.721136

Hanggara, Y., Aisyah, S. H., & Amelia, F. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender. Pythagoras: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.33373/pythagoras.v11i2.4490

Islamiyah, H., Hartati, L., & Isnaningrum, I. (2022). Pengaruh Self Efficacy Dan Metakognisi Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika (SNAPMAT) (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 111-117).

Jagadianti, G. W., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2023). Argumentasi Analogis Siswa Sma Pada Masalah Analogi Tipe Prediktif. 12(3), 881–897. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n3.p881-897

Kartika, H., Warmi, A., Urayama, D., & Suprihatiningsih, S. (2024). Mathematical Argumentation in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(07), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.53761/e0vd5v40

Kurniawan, S., Rosjanuardi, R., & Suhendra, S. (2023). Students’ Mathematical Argumentation Ability When Proving Mathematical Statements Based On Self-Efficacy. Jurnal Elemen, 9(2), 578–590. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i2.15151

Mukti, B., & Tentama, F. (2020). Construction Of Self-Efficacy Scale: A Psychometric Study For Students. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(1), 596-600.

Mumu, J., Tanujaya, B., Charitas, R., & Prahmana, I. (2022). Likert Scale In Social Sciences Research: Problems And Difficulties. Fwu Journal Of Social Sciences, 16(4), 89-101.

https://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/Winter2022/7

Naja, F. Y., Sa’o, S., Mei, A., Studi, P., & Matematika, P. (2021). Tingkat Berpikir Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri Bangun Datar Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Matematika Dan Gender. 05(02), 1071–1081. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i2.586

Nasution, R. A., & Pasaribu, L. H. (2023). Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik Dan Self-Efficacy Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(1). 798-806. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i1.4606

Óskarsdóttir, E., Donnelly, V., Turner-Cmuchal, M., & Florian, L. (2020). Inclusive School Leaders – Their Role In Raising The Achievement Of All Learners. Journal Of Educational Administration, 58(5), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2019-0190

Özdemir, N. (2019). Principal leaderhip and students' achievement: Mediated pathways of professional community and teachers' instructional practices. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 16(1).

Perera, H. N., & John, J. E. (2020). Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs for teaching math: Relations with teacher and student outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101842.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101842

Putra, R. P., Madawistama, T., Heryani, Y., & Matematika, P. (2022). Kemampuan argumentasi matematis ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Jurnal Kongruen, 1(2), 175-181. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v2i3.2172

Rahmi, S., Nadia, R., Hasibah, B., & Hidayat, W. (2017). The relation between self-efficacy toward math with the math communication competence. Infinity Journal, 6(2), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i2.p177-182

Ramadhani, R. (2020). Pengukuran self-efficacy siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika di SMK Negeri 6 Medan. Jurnal Pionir LPPM Universitas Asahan Vol, 7(3), 32-38.

Resmi, D. C., & Rusdi, M. (2021). Desain LKPD pada materi sistem persamaan linear tiga variabel berbasis generative learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi matematika siswa SMA. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 1854-1868.

Sarah, Y. D., Ariawan, R., & Nufus, H. (2023). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal higher order thinking skills ditinjau dari self efficacy. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v9i1.18838

Schunk, D. H., & Dibenedetto, M. K. (2016). Self-Efficacy Theory In Education. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook Of Motivation At School (2nd Ed., Pp. 34–35). Routledge.

Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2019). Social Cognitive Theory And Motivation. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook Of Human Motivation (2nd Ed., Pp. 11–26). Oxford University Press.

Siregar, T., Hilda, L., Amir, A., Syekh, U., Hasan, A., & Padangsidimpuan, A. A. (2024). Evaluasi Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Mahasiswa Melalui Penggunaan Metode Tugas Berbasis Proyek Di Uin Syahada Padangsidimpuan.

Smit, R., Dober, H., Hess, K., Bachmann, P., & Birri, T. (2023). Supporting Primary Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Practice: The Effects Of Formative Feedback And The Mediating Role Of Self-Efficacy. Research In Mathematics Education, 25(3), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2022.2062780

Sugiyono. (2015). Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Dan R&D , (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015), 407 1. Metode Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Dan R&D, 2015.

Sukirwan, Muhtadi, D., Saleh, H., & Warsito. (2020). Profile Of Students’ Justifications Of Mathematical Argumentation. Infinity Journal, 9(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p197-212

Taylor, R. W., & Ringlaben, R. P. (2012). Impacting Pre-Service Teachers' Attitudes toward Inclusion. Higher Education Studies, 2(3), 16-23.

https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n3p16

Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge university press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005

Umami, N. N. (2023). Tinjauan Naratif Tentang Menyingkap Fakta Dengan Analisis Statistik. Jurnal Ilmu Data, 3(1), 1-9.

Walton, D. (2004). Legal Argumentation And Evidence. The Pennsylvania state university Press. University Park Pennsylvania.

Wirawan, N., Yuhana, Y., & Fatah, A. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Bentuk Literasi Numerasi Akm Pada Konten Bilangan Ditinjau Dari Disposisi Matematis. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2715–2728. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2623