How impulsive VS reflective Students’ self-regulated learning in mathematics with Learning Management System
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to describe the learning independence of students with reflective and impulsive cognitive styles in learning mathematics with LMS, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of using LMS. The research was conducted in one of the madrasahs in the Jakarta area. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative with a population of 24 fourth-grade students using a subject sample of 6 students through categorization using purposive techniques. Data collection techniques were observation, interviews, documentation, MFFT tests, and data analysis techniques using descriptive and triangulation techniques. The results showed that the learning independence of students with a reflective cognitive style has initiative, does not depend on others, and is confident, disciplined, and responsible. The learning independence of students with impulsive cognitive styles have initiative, rely on others, are confident and accountable, and do not behave disciplined. The advantages of LMS are that it makes it easier for students to learn math flexibly, and many features are available, while the disadvantages of LMS are signal-constrained problems. This research has a contribution for teachers in determining learning strategies based on student characteristics.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The requirements that must be met by the author are as follows:
- The author saves the copyright and gives the journal simultaneously with the license under Creative Commons Attribution License which permits other people to share the work by stating that it is firstly published in this journal.
- The author can post their work in an institutional repository or publish it in a book by by stating that it is firstly published in this journal.
- The author is allowed to post their work online (for instance, in an institutional repository or their own website) before and during the process of delivery. (see Open Access Effect).
How to Cite
References
Cao, T. X. L. (2023). Benefits and challenges of using LMS in blended learning: Views from EFL teachers and students at a Vietnamese public university. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 3(3), 78–100. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.23335
Damayanti, H. L., & Anando, A. A. (2021). Peran guru dalam menumbuhkembangkan kemandirian siswa melalui pembelajaran inkuiri. Jurnal Sinestesia, 11(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.53696/27219283.59
Donkoh, S., & Mensah, J. (2023). Application of triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Applied Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 10(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.15406/jabb.2023.10.00319
Enmufida, Jupri, A., & Yulianti, K. (2021). Analisis kemandirian belajar matematika siswa menggunakan lms dalam blended learning. Journal on Mathematics Education Research, 2(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.17509/j-mer.v2i2.53933
Fitriana, D., Suhendra, & Juandi, D. (2023). Self-efficacy siswa SMA bergaya kognitif impulsif dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jumlahku: Jurnal Matematika Ilmiah, 9(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.33222/jumlahku.v9i1.2642
Fitriani, A., & Yusri, F. (2022). Tingkat kemandirian belajar pada remaja. Consilium: Berkala Kajian Konseling Dan Ilmu Keagamaan, 9(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.37064/consilium.v9i1.11332
Hadi, M., & Sovitriana, R. (2019). Model kemandirian belajar siswa Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 9 Jakarta. Ikra-Ith Humaniora: Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 3, 26–32.
Hadi, T. S., Mastur, Z., Wardono, & Khotimah. (2021). Implementation of Learning Management System (LMS) in mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042106
Herianto. (2020). Matching Familiar Figures Tes (MFFT): Instrumen tes untuk mengukur gaya kognitif siswa reflektif dan impulsif (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/34ut8
Hermansyah, Yahya, F., Fitriyanto, S., Musahrain, & Nurhairunnisah. (2020). Kemandirian belajar calon guru fisika melalui pembelajaran berbasis LMS: Schoology. Indonesian Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 34–42.
Jin, S. H., Im, K., Yoo, M., Roll, I., & Seo, K. (2023). Supporting students’ self-regulated learning in online learning using artificial intelligence applications. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00406-5
Larasati, N. I., & Widyasari, N. (2021). Penerapan media pembelajaran berbasis Augmented Reality terhadap peningkatan pemahaman matematis siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 7(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.7.1.45-50
Lovez, E., Rustam, Silvia, & Sayu. (2023). Analisis kemandirian belajar matematika siswa pada pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw di kelas VIII SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Realistik (JI-MR), 4(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.33365/ji-mr.v4i1.2486
Luckyardi, S., & Rahman, L. (2021). Application of e-learning system in the world of education. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Pendidikan, 14(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.24036/tip.v14i1
Luo, X., Liu, M., Han, Z., Jiang, W., Wang, Z., Li, K., Gu, Y., & Shidujaman, M. (2024). A study on cognitive style type test and its application in teaching activities. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 14687, pp. 254–274). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60441-6_17
Makwana, D., Engineer, P., Dabhi, A., & Chudasama, H. (2023). Sampling methods in research: A review. International Journal of Trend in Scientific and Development (IJTSRD), 7(3), 762–768. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371985656
Maulidditya, D., Sudiana, R., & Pamungkas, A. S. (2020). Pembelajaran matematika pada LMS Chamilo untuk meningkatkan kemandirian belajar siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 13(2), 344–356.
Multazam, M. N., Korompot, C. A., & Munir, M. (2022). Benefits and difficulties in using Learning Management System (LMS) in paragraph writing class: A study of a lecturer’s and her students’ perception. Journal of Excellence in English Language Education, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.26858/joeele.v1i1,%20January.31230
Rahayu, I. F., & Aini, I. N. (2021). Analisis kemandirian belajar dalam pembelajaran matematika pada siswa SMP. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 4(4), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i4.789-798
Rofiiqoh, N., & Qosyim, A. (2023). Analisis kemandirian belajar siswa SMP dalam pembelajaran IPA di masa pandemi Covid-19. PENSA: E-Jurnal Pendidikan SAINS, 11(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppii.v11i2.60894
Rohmah, W. N., Septian, A., & Inayah, S. (2020). Analisis kemampuan penalaran matematis pada materi bangun ruang ditinjau dari gaya kognitif siswa SMP. JP: Jurnal PRISMA, 9(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v9i2.1043
Saputra, E., & Fahrizal, E. (2019). The development of mathematics teaching materials through geogebra software to improve learning independence. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 2(2), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v2i2.1860
Simanullang, N. H. S., & Rajagukguk, J. (2020). Learning Management System (LMS) based on moodle to improve students learning activity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1462(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1462/1/012067
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif & RnD (Sutopo (ed.); 2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Sulistyowati, M. A. R., Sutoyo, S., & Prihastari, E. B. (2022). Analisis kemandirian belajar peserta didik kelas IV dalam mengerjakan soal matematika di masa pandemi. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 9(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.30659/pendas.9.1.68-82
Sundari, S., Fuadi, D., & Hidayati, Y. M. (2022). Kemandirian belajar matematika masa pandemi Covid-19 pada siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1), 1389–1397. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i1.2233
Supiani, E. M., & Firmansyah, D. (2023). Analisis kemandirian belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika pasca pembelajaran daring. JPMI: Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 6(3), 1125–1134.
https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i3.17066
Tucker-Drob, E. M., Briley, D. A., & Harden, K. P. (2013). Genetic and environmental influences on cognition across development and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413485087
Wicaksono, F. E., Utami, R. E., & Purwati, H. (2023). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis pada materi statistika berdasarkan teori apos ditinjau dari gaya kognitif reflektif dan impulsif. JIPMat: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v8i2.15829
Widyasari, N., & Hayyun, M. (2017). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika SD. Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta.
Widyasari, N., & Putri, A. K. P. (2019). Pengembangan media pembelajaran scrapbook berbasis budaya palembang pada topik bangun datar. Jurnal PINUS: Jurnal Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 5(1), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.29407/pn.v5i1.13756
Wulandari, A. (2022). Analisis kemandirian belajar siswa pada pembelajaran matematika. Journal of Mathematics Learning Innovation (JMLI), 1(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.35905/jmlipare.v1i2.3648
Yahya, I., & Warmi, A. (2021). Analisis kemandirian belajar matematika saat pembelajaran daring pada siswa SMP. Jurnal Maju, 8(2), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i2.1961
Yulistina, E., Nurkamilah, M., & Fitri, S. (2020). Efektivitas pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) terhadap kemandirian dan prestasi belajar peserta didik pada materi perangkat lunak pengolah angka. Jurnal Produktif, 4(2), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.35568/produktif.v4i2.1009