Estimating domain score using bayesian method and bayesian modal viewed from many domain item samples

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jun 30, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19109/jpmrafa.v11i1.25076
Keywords:
Bayesian, Domain Scores, Modal Bayesian

Main Article Content

Michrun Nisa Ramli
UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
Muslimahayati Muslimahayati
UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0435-3543

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to compare two methods of domain scores estimation namely Bayesian method and Bayesian Modal method were derived from many sample items taken from the domain. The research was a comparative quantitative studies of the junior high school students in Jambi. The data were analyzed using variances difference test domain scores between the two populations. The results were as follow: 1) the Bayesian was the most accurate method for domain scores estimation, 2) the more samples that were taken from the domain items, the more accurate the domain scores would be obtained. The results of this study strongly suggest that in order to determine the level of mastery for a specific material, students do not need to work on all the items but only some of them are taken from the population of items that contain this material


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Ramli, M. N., & Muslimahayati, M. (2025). Estimating domain score using bayesian method and bayesian modal viewed from many domain item samples. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 11(1), 42-57. https://doi.org/10.19109/jpmrafa.v11i1.25076
Issue
Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA
Section
Artikel
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The requirements that must be met by the author are as follows:

  1. The author saves the copyright and gives the journal simultaneously with the license  under Creative Commons Attribution License which permits other people to share the work by stating that it is firstly published in this journal.
  2. The author can post their work in an institutional repository or publish it in a book by by stating that it is firstly published in this journal.
  3. The author is allowed to post their work online (for instance, in an institutional repository or their own website) before and during the process of delivery. (see Open Access Effect).

How to Cite

Ramli, M. N., & Muslimahayati, M. (2025). Estimating domain score using bayesian method and bayesian modal viewed from many domain item samples. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 11(1), 42-57. https://doi.org/10.19109/jpmrafa.v11i1.25076

References

Andayani, T., & Madani, F. (2023). Peran penilaian pembelajaran dalam meningkatkan prestasi siswa di pendidikan dasar. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(2), 924–930. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i2.4402

Baker, F. B., & Kim, S. H. (2004). Item response theory parameter estimation techniques. Marcel Dekker Inc.

Djaali, & Pudjiono. (2007). Pengukuran dalam bidang pendidikan. Gramedia Widia Sarana.

Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2013). Item response theory. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605269

Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1991). Item response theory. Nijhoff Publishing.

Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Sage Publication Inc.

Hasanah, S., Pomalingo, D. Z., Kurnia, A., Dwinata, A., Matematika, P., Maritim Raja, U., & Haji, A. (2024). Pengaruh panjang tes dan ukuran contoh pada pendugaan parameter model IRT. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 8(3), 408–412. https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v8i3.19663

Iriawan, N., & Astuti, S. P. (2006). Mengolah data statistik dengan mudah menggunakan minitab 14. CV. Andi Offset.

Kern, H. (2007). The estimation of domain score through IRT methods on a mathematics placement test. Clemson University.

Lord, F. M. (1990). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Mardapi, D. (2007). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Mitra Medika.

Musarwan, M., & Warsah, I. (2022). Evaluasi pembelajaran (konsep, fungsi dan tujuan) sebuah tinjauan teoritis. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Islam, 186–199. https://doi.org/10.58561/jkpi.v1i2.35

Naga, S. D. (1992). Teori skor pada pengukuran pendidikan. Besbats.

Naga, S. D. (2012). Teori skor pada pengukuran mental. Nagarani Citrayasa.

Nitko, A. J. (2001). Educational assessment of student. Merrill Prentice Hall.

Pommerich, M., & Nicewander, W. A. (1998). Estimating average domain scores (Issues 98–5).

Popham, W. J. (1974). Evaluation in education. McCutrhan Publishing Corporation.

Prastiwi, Y. E. N., Arba’iyah, Amatullah Al Barru, A., & Syarif Hidayatullah, A. (2023). Penilaian dan pengukuran hasil belajar pada peserta didik berbasis analisis psikologi. Bersatu: Jurnal Pendidikan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika, 1(4), 218–231.

Rahman, F., Hermina, D., Huda, N., Palangka Raya, I., Tengah, K., Antasari Banjarmasin, U., Selatan, K., & Author, C. (1993). Urgensi penilaian pembelajaran di dunia pendidikan formal (hakikat, sistem, dan perencanaan). 5(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.23971/mdr.v5i2.5064

Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori respons butir dan penerapannya. Nuha Medika.

Sudaryono, S. (2011). Implementasi teori responsi butir (Item Response Theory) pada penilaian hasil belajar akhir di sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 17(6), 719–732. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v17i6.62