Kontroversi Kaidah Taraduf Dalam Al-Qur’an
Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 14, 2021
Keywords:
Al-Qur’an, Kontroversi, Taraduf
Main Article Content
Abstract
Dalam susunan bahasa al-Qur’an, terdapat beberapa kata dengan makna yang sama tetapi berbeda dalam pengucapannya (baca: sinonim). Para ulama berbeda pendapat dalam menyikapi persoalan ini. Sebagaian mendukung sepenuhnya eksistensi taraduf (sinonim) dalam al-Qur’an, sementara sebagian yang lain menafikannya. Tulisan ini mengulas kontroversi kaidah taraduf dalam al-Qur’an. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan Ulumul Qur’an dan kaidah tafsir, didapati temuan bahwa sebagian ulama membenarkan taraduf dalam al-Qur’an karena dipahami sebagai al-ahruf al-sab’ah, taukid, dan mutasyabih, sehingga terkadang ada dua kata atau lebih yang berbeda tetapi memiliki satu makna. Sementara sebagian ulama yang lain, memahami al-Qur’an tidak mungkin memiliki dua kata atau lebih yang digunakan untuk satu makna. Alasannya karena akan mengurangi i’jaz al-Qur’an dengan tidak berartinya salah satu dari dua kata tersebut, sementara setiap kata dalam al-Qur’an sudah pasti memiliki makna berbeda. Oleh karena itu, menurut pendapat yang terakhir ini, tidak ada taraduf dalam al-Qur’an.
Abstract
In the composition of the language of the Qur’an, there are several words with the same meaning but different in pronunciation (read: synonyms). The scholars differed in their views on this issue. Some fully support the existence of taraduf (synonyms) in the Qur’an, while some others deny it. This paper reviews the controversies of the rules of taraduf in the Qur’an. By using the Ulumul Qur’an approach and the rules of interpretation, it was found that some scholars justified taraduf in the Qur’an because it was understood as al-ahruf al-sab’ah, taukid, and mutasyabih, so sometimes there are two or more different words but has one meaning. While some other scholars understand the Qur’an it is impossible to have two or more words used for one meaning. The reason is because it will reduce i’jaz al-Qur’an by meaningless one of the two words, while each word in the Qur’an certainly has a different meaning. Therefore, in this latter opinion, there is no taraduf in the Qur’an.
Abstract
In the composition of the language of the Qur’an, there are several words with the same meaning but different in pronunciation (read: synonyms). The scholars differed in their views on this issue. Some fully support the existence of taraduf (synonyms) in the Qur’an, while some others deny it. This paper reviews the controversies of the rules of taraduf in the Qur’an. By using the Ulumul Qur’an approach and the rules of interpretation, it was found that some scholars justified taraduf in the Qur’an because it was understood as al-ahruf al-sab’ah, taukid, and mutasyabih, so sometimes there are two or more different words but has one meaning. While some other scholars understand the Qur’an it is impossible to have two or more words used for one meaning. The reason is because it will reduce i’jaz al-Qur’an by meaningless one of the two words, while each word in the Qur’an certainly has a different meaning. Therefore, in this latter opinion, there is no taraduf in the Qur’an.
Article Details
How to Cite
Iskandar, Iskandar. “Kontroversi Kaidah Taraduf Dalam Al-Qur’an”. Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu al-Quran dan Tafsir 1, no. 2 (December 14, 2021): 131–147. Accessed March 26, 2025. https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/jsq/article/view/10164.
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
How to Cite
Iskandar, Iskandar. “Kontroversi Kaidah Taraduf Dalam Al-Qur’an”. Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu al-Quran dan Tafsir 1, no. 2 (December 14, 2021): 131–147. Accessed March 26, 2025. https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/jsq/article/view/10164.
References
Al-‘Akk, Khalid Abdurrahman. Ushul al-Tafsir wa Qawa’iduhu. Beirut: Dar al-Nafais, 1986.
Al-Ashfahani, Abu al-Qasim al-Raghib. Mufradat fi Gharib al-Qur’an. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 2008.
Al-Baqi, Muhammaf Fuad Abd. Mu’jam al-Mufahras li alfad al-Quran. Kairo: Dar al-Hadis, 2001.
Al-Jurjani, ‘Ali bin Muhammad. Mu’jam al-Ta’rifat. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 2009.
Al-Munajjad, Muhammad Nuruddin. al-Taraduf fi al-Qur’an al-Karim. Baina al- Mazariyah wa al-Tatbiq, t.th.
Al-Qaththan, Manna’ Khalil. Mabahits fi ulum al-Qur’an. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 2000.
Al-Suyuthi, Jalaluddin Abdurrahman. al-Muzhir. Kairo: Maktabah Dar al-Turats, t.th.
Al-Tawwab, Ramadhan Abd. Fushul fi fiqh al-Lughah. Kairo: Khanji, 1999.
Al-Tsa’labi, Abd al-Malik bin Muhammad Abu Manshur. Majalis al-Tsa’lab. Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, Cet. Ke-2, t.th.
Al-Zarkasyi, Badruddin Muhammad bin ‘Abdullah. al-Burhan fi Ulum al-Qur’an. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 2007.
Mandzur, Muhammad bin Makram Ibn. Lisan al-Arab, Juz XIX. Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, t.th.
Shihab, M. Quraish. Kaidah Tafsir: Syarat, Ketentuan, dan Aturan yang Patut Anda Ketahui dalam Memahami Ayat-ayat al-Qur’an. Tangerang: Lentera Hati, 2015.
Syati’, ‘Aisyah Abdurrahman Bintu. al-I’jaz al-Bayani wa Masail Ibn al-Azraq. Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1971.
Umar, Ahmad Mukhtar. Ilm al-Dilalah. Kairo: Ilm al-Kutub, 1998.
Ya’qub, Emil Badi’. Mausu’ah ‘Ulum al-Lugah al-‘Arabiyah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al- ‘Ilmiyah, 2006.
Zulfikar, Eko dan Abidin, Ahmad Zainal. Ikhtilaf al-Mufassirin: Memahami Sebab-Sebab Perbedaan Ulama Dalam Penafsiran Alquran. At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an dan Tafsir, Vol. 4, No. 2, Desember 2019.
Al-Ashfahani, Abu al-Qasim al-Raghib. Mufradat fi Gharib al-Qur’an. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 2008.
Al-Baqi, Muhammaf Fuad Abd. Mu’jam al-Mufahras li alfad al-Quran. Kairo: Dar al-Hadis, 2001.
Al-Jurjani, ‘Ali bin Muhammad. Mu’jam al-Ta’rifat. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 2009.
Al-Munajjad, Muhammad Nuruddin. al-Taraduf fi al-Qur’an al-Karim. Baina al- Mazariyah wa al-Tatbiq, t.th.
Al-Qaththan, Manna’ Khalil. Mabahits fi ulum al-Qur’an. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 2000.
Al-Suyuthi, Jalaluddin Abdurrahman. al-Muzhir. Kairo: Maktabah Dar al-Turats, t.th.
Al-Tawwab, Ramadhan Abd. Fushul fi fiqh al-Lughah. Kairo: Khanji, 1999.
Al-Tsa’labi, Abd al-Malik bin Muhammad Abu Manshur. Majalis al-Tsa’lab. Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, Cet. Ke-2, t.th.
Al-Zarkasyi, Badruddin Muhammad bin ‘Abdullah. al-Burhan fi Ulum al-Qur’an. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 2007.
Mandzur, Muhammad bin Makram Ibn. Lisan al-Arab, Juz XIX. Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, t.th.
Shihab, M. Quraish. Kaidah Tafsir: Syarat, Ketentuan, dan Aturan yang Patut Anda Ketahui dalam Memahami Ayat-ayat al-Qur’an. Tangerang: Lentera Hati, 2015.
Syati’, ‘Aisyah Abdurrahman Bintu. al-I’jaz al-Bayani wa Masail Ibn al-Azraq. Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1971.
Umar, Ahmad Mukhtar. Ilm al-Dilalah. Kairo: Ilm al-Kutub, 1998.
Ya’qub, Emil Badi’. Mausu’ah ‘Ulum al-Lugah al-‘Arabiyah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al- ‘Ilmiyah, 2006.
Zulfikar, Eko dan Abidin, Ahmad Zainal. Ikhtilaf al-Mufassirin: Memahami Sebab-Sebab Perbedaan Ulama Dalam Penafsiran Alquran. At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an dan Tafsir, Vol. 4, No. 2, Desember 2019.