Religious Fundamentalism: Constructs and Measurement for Indonesian Muslims
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Religious fundamentalism constitutes an attitudinal and behavioral approach to religious adherence underpinned by an intratextual cognitive framework, which prioritizes the literal interpretation and comprehension of sacred texts. This principle-oriented cognitive paradigm is not contingent upon meaning but rather on process, where in the text itself dictates the methodology of its own reading and interpretation. Consequently, this approach negates dialogical engagement, reducing the dichotomy to either adherence to textual truth or its rejection, thereby fostering epistemic closure to alternative sources of truth construction. While prior studies have sought to quantify religious fundamentalism in Indonesia through diverse constructs and instruments, none have explicitly centered on the intratextual cognitive dimension, raising critical questions regarding the development of a robust measurement framework grounded in this paradigm. Employing confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch model analysis with a sample of 323 respondents, this study addresses this gap. The CFA results demonstrated that the proposed construct of religious fundamentalism, comprising six dimensions (divine, inerrant, authoritative, self-interpretive, privileged, and unchanging) and operationalized through 12 items, yielded a model with satisfactory fit indices, wherein 9 items exhibited validity and 3 were invalid. Concurrently, Rasch model analysis confirms that all items conform to the model’s expectations, effectively measuring intratextual paradigm-based fundamentalism. Notably, certain items exhibited high difficulty indices, attributable to respondent ambivalence when engaging with contentious statements. These findings present a validated instrument for evaluating religious fundamentalism through an intratextual approach, specifically adapted to the socioreligious framework of Indonesian Muslim communities. Consequently, this tool is capable of capturing the manifestations of religious fundamentalism in Indonesia with an empirical foundation, thereby enabling a more precise understanding and analysis of religious dynamics within Indonesian society
Article Details
Psikis: Jurnal Psikologi Islami by http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/psikis is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
References
Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5
Antes, P. (2021). Religious fundamentalism—A misleading concept? Religious Fundamentalism in the Age of Pandemic, Query date: 2023-02-01 14:13:59, 251–262.
Aryadoust, V., Ng, L. Y., & Sayama, H. (2021). A comprehensive review of Rasch measurement in language assessment: Recommendations and guidelines for research. Language Testing, 38(1), 6–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220927487
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (Third edition). Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Brewczynski, J., & MacDonald, D. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Allport and Ross Religious Orientation Scale With a Polish Sample. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 16(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1601_6
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.
Dobriban, E. (2017). Sharp detection in PCA under correlations: All eigenvalues matter. The Annals of Statistics, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1214/16-AOS1514
El Hafiz, S. (2020). A Literature Review on Religiosity n Psychological Research in Indonesia: Current State and Future Direction. Psikis : Jurnal Psikologi Islami, 6(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.19109/psikis.v6i1.3953
Hood, R. W., Hill, P. C., & Williamson, W. P. (2005). The psychology of religious fundamentalism. Guilford Press.
Jöreskog, K. G., Olsson, U. H., & Wallentin, F. Y. (2016). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). In K. G. Jöreskog, U. H. Olsson, & F. Y. Wallentin, Multivariate Analysis with LISREL (pp. 283–339). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33153-9_7
Käsehage, N. (2021). Religious fundamentalism in the age of pandemic. In Religious Fundamentalism in the Age of Pandemic (p. 278). https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839454855
Keeves, J. P., Alagumalai, S., Curtis, D. D., & Hungi, N. (Eds.). (2005). Applied Rasch measurement: A book of exemplars: papers in honour of John P. Keeves. Springer.
Kim, H., Ku, B., Kim, J. Y., Park, Y.-J., & Park, Y.-B. (2016). Confirmatory and Exploratory Factor Analysis for Validating the Phlegm Pattern Questionnaire for Healthy Subjects. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2016(1), 2696019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2696019
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
Kunst, J. R., Thomsen, L., & Sam, D. L. (2014). Late Abrahamic reunion? Religious fundamentalism negatively predicts dual Abrahamic group categorization among Muslims and Christians: Late Abrahamic reunion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2014
Latifa, R., Fahri, M., Subchi, I., & Mahida, N. F. (2022). The Intention of Becoming Religiously Moderate in Indonesian Muslims: Do Knowledge and Attitude Interfere? Religions, 13(6), 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13060540
Liht, J., Conway, L. G., Savage, S., White, W., & O’Neill, K. A. (2011). Religious Fundamentalism: An Empirically Derived Construct and Measurement Scale. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 33(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1163/157361211X594159
Linacre, J. M. (2002). What Do Infit, Outfit, Mean-Square, and Standardization Mean? Rasch Measurement Forum; Archives of Rasch Measurement.
Linacre, J. M. (2008). WINSTEPS Rasch measurement computer program [Version 3.65.0] [Computer software]. Winsteps.com.
Łowicki, P., Marchlewska, M., Molenda, Z., & Karakula, A. (2022). Does religion predict coronavirus conspiracy beliefs? Centrality of religiosity, religious fundamentalism, and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 187(Query date: 2023-02-01 14:13:59). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111413
Nagata, J. (2001). Beyond Theology: Toward an Anthropology of “Fundamentalism.” American Anthropologist, 103(2), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2001.103.2.481
Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual; a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (version 10). Buckingham Open University Press.
Paul Williamson, W., Hood, R. W., Ahmad, A., Sadiq, M., & Hill, P. C. (2010). The Intratextual Fundamentalism Scale: Cross-cultural application, validity evidence, and relationship with religious orientation and the Big 5 factor markers1. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13(7–8), 721–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670802643047
Putra, I. E., & Wongkaren, Z. A. (2010). Konstruksi Skala Fundamentalisme Islam di Indonesia. Psikobuana, 1(3), 151–161.
Rahayu, W., Putra, M. D. K., Iriyadi, D., Rahmawati, Y., & Koul, R. B. (2020). A Rasch and factor analysis of an Indonesian version of the Student Perception of Opportunity Competence Development (SPOCD) questionnaire. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1721633. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1721633
Razaghi, M., Chavoshian, H., Chanzanagh, H. E., & Rabiei, K. (2020). Religious fundamentalism, individuality, and collective identity: A case study of two student organizations in Iran. Critical Research on Religion, 8(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050303219900226
Salsabila, F., Nurihsan, J., & Sunarya, Y. (2023). Pengujian Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Manajemen Diri Remaja: Rasch Model Analysis. Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Terapan, 7(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.30598/jbkt.v7i1.1741
Skalski, S. B., Loichen, T., Toussaint, L. L., Uram, P., Kwiatkowska, A., & Surzykiewicz, J. (2022). Relationships between Spirituality, Religious Fundamentalism and Environmentalism: The Mediating Role of Right-Wing Authoritarianism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013242
Sobol, M., Zajenkowski, M., & Jankowski, K. S. (2022). Religious Fundamentalism, Delusions, and Conspiracy Beliefs Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159597
Subchi, I., Zulkifli, Z., Latifa, R., & Sa’diyah, S. (2022). Religious Moderation in Indonesian Muslims. Religions, 13(5), 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050451
Taufiq, A., Yudha, E. S., Md, Y. H., & Suryana, D. (2021). Examining the Supervision Work Alliance Scale: A Rasch Model Approach. The Open Psychology Journal, 14(1), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350102114010179
Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care & Research, 57(8), 1358–1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23108
Umar, J., & Nisa, Y. F. (2020). Uji Validitas Konstruk dengan CFA dan Pelaporannya. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I), 9(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v9i2.16964
Winter, C., & Hasan, U. (2016). The Balanced Nation: Islam and the Challenges of Extremism, Fundamentalism, Islamism and Jihadism. Philosophia, 44(3), 667–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-015-9634-2
Zafrullah, Sa’adatul Ulwiyah, & Nofriyandi. (2023). Rasch Model Analysis on Mathematics Test Instruments: Biblioshiny (1983-2023). Mathematics Research and Education Journal, 7(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.25299/mrej.2023.vol7(2).14550