Library Users' Perceptions of the Spatial Layout and Ergonomics of College Libraries in Pekanbaru
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
College libraries not only function as information collection centers, but also as learning spaces and academic interactions that require physical comfort for users. This study aims to analyze user perceptions of library layout and ergonomics and examine the influence of both aspects on user comfort in universities in Pekanbaru City. The study used a quantitative approach with a descriptive-explanatory type. The survey method was employed by distributing structured questionnaires using a five-point Likert scale to 100 active users of the Library Units of Universitas Riau, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, and Universitas Lancang Kuning. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression using SPSS software. The results of the study indicate that in general, users have a positive perception of the library layout and ergonomics, although there are still critical notes on the aspects of acoustics, room zoning, and facility comfort for long-term use. The results of the regression test indicate that layout and ergonomics simultaneously have a significant effect on user comfort. Partially, both variables also have a positive effect, with layout as the most dominant factor. This research provides practical benefits as a basis for consideration for library managers in designing and improving the quality of the physical environment that is oriented towards user needs. Furthermore, this research contributes academically to enriching empirical studies on the spatial design and ergonomics of university libraries in Indonesia.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
How to Cite
References
Applegate, R. (2009). The library is for studying: Student preferences for study space. The
Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(4), 341–346.
DOI 10.1016/j.acalib.2009.04.006
Aryadi, V. F., & Susilowati, I. H. (2021). Kajian Ergonomi Sarana Pendukung Proses Belajar Terhadap Keluhan Gotrak Mahasiswa Institusi Pendidikan X. PREPOTIF: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 5(2), 742-748. DOI 10.31004/prepotif.v5i2.1928
Astriyanti, & Haryanti. (2021). Penataan ruang perpustakaan dalam meningkatkan
kenyamanan pemustaka. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan.
Azadi, S., Bai, N., & Nourian, P. (2024). Ergonomics of spatial configurations: a voxel-based modelling framework for accessibility and visibility simulations. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, 1300843. DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2023.1300843
Bates, M. J., & Maack, M. N. (2009). Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. CRC Press. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Encyclopedia_of_Library_and_Information.html
Beard, J., & Dale, P. (2010). Library design, learning spaces and academic literacy. New
Library World, 111(11/12), 480–492. DOI 10.1108/03074801011094859
Bennett, S. (2009). Libraries and learning: A history of paradigm change. portal: Libraries
and the Academy, 9(2), 181–197. DOI 10.1353/pla.0.0049
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage. https://books.google.co.id/books=4uB76IC_pOQC&printsec
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and
purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
DOI 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS. Badan Penerbit
Universitas Diponegoro.
Groves, R. M., Fowler Jr, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. DOI 10.1002/9780470465462
Gunarathna, M. (2024). Student Satisfaction with Physical and Digital Library Facilities in Higher Education Institutes. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 71(2), 190-199. DOI 10.56042/alis.v71i2.7349
Hair, J. F., et al. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Multivariate_Data_Analysis.html
Helander, M. G. (2006). A guide to human factors and ergonomics (2nd ed.). CRC Press. DOI 10.1201/9780203489925
International Ergonomics Association. (2024). Definition and domains of ergonomics. https://iea.cc/about/what-is-ergonomics
Iskak, P. I., & Andriani, J. (2014). Persepsi pemustaka terhadap kenyamanan ruangan perpustakaan di Pusat Perpustakaan dan Penyebaran Teknologi Pertanian. Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian, 23(1), 32-38. DOI 10.21082/jpp.v23n1.2014.p32-38
Khoo, M. J., Rozaklis, L., & Hall, C. (2012). A survey of the use of ethnographic methods in the study of libraries and library users. Library & Information Science Research, 34(2), 82–91. DOI 10.1016/j.lisr.2011.07.010
Lasa Hs. (2009). Manajemen perpustakaan. Gama Media.
Lasyata, A., Wike, & Widodo, S. (2023). Persepsi pemustaka terhadap tata ruang Perpustakaan Universitas Brawijaya. Jurnal Administrasi Publik. https://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/207671/1
Lemeshow, S., et al. (1990). Adequacy of sample size in health studies. Wiley. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joshua-Ofoeda/post
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=9rotAAAAYAAJ
Lin, J., Shen, J., & Silfvenius, C. (2024). Human-centric and integrative lighting asset management in public libraries: insights and innovations on its strategy and sustainable development. Sustainability, 16(5), 2096. DOI 10.3390/su16052096
Majidi, V., Saradj, F. M., & Khanmohammadi, M. A. (2023). Explaining the quality of the architectural space in academic libraries based on user preferences. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 20(122), 29-52. DOI 10.22034/BAGH.2023.351938.5227
Montgomery, S. E. (2014). Library space assessment: User learning and behaviors. Journal of
Academic Librarianship. DOI 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.02.003
Noh, Y. (2022). The analytic study of librarian-user and importance-satisfaction on the use factor of complex cultural space in library. Library Hi Tech, 40(6), 1532-1566. DOI 10.1108/LHT-06-2020-0135
Onunka, O., Onunka, T., Fawole, A. A., Adeleke, I. J., & Daraojimba, C. (2023). Library and information services in the digital age: Opportunities and challenges. Acta Informatica Malaysia, 7(1), 113-121. DOI 10.26480/aim.02.2023.113.121
Oyedokun, T. T. (2025). Navigating the dynamics of present-day academic libraries: An in-depth analysis of strategies, challenges, and emerging trends. IFLA journal, 51(2), 470-489. DOI 10.1177/03400352241291907
Peng, L., Wei, W., Fan, W., Jin, S., & Liu, Y. (2022). Student experience and satisfaction in academic libraries: A comparative study among three universities in Wuhan. Buildings, 12(5), 682. DOI 10.3390/buildings12050682
PPID Riau. (2023). Data pengunjung Perpustakaan Soeman HS. Pekanbaru.
Reja, M. (2023). Pengaruh Tata Ruang terhadap Kenyamanan Pemustaka di Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Aceh Selatan. UIN Ar-Raniry. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/31802/1
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Organizational behavior. Pearson Education. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Organizational_Behavior.html?hl
Robertson, M. M., Ciriello, V. M., & Garabet, A. M. (2013). Office ergonomics training and a sit-stand workstation: Effects on musculoskeletal and visual symptoms and performance of office workers. Applied ergonomics, 44(1), 73-85. DOI 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.05.002
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business (7th ed.). Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books=Ko6bCgAAQBAJ&printsece
Sirait, F. R., Zakiah, D. M., & Darus, P. (2022). Penerapan Konsep Ergonomi Di Perpustakaan Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Teknologi Kesehatan dan Ilmu Sosial (TEKESNOS), 4(2), 369-376. https://e-journal.sari-mutiara.ac.id/index.php/tekesnos/article/download/3539/2429
Tenopir, C., Dalton, E. D., Christian, L., Jones, M. K., McCabe, M., Smith, M., & Fish, A. (2017). Imagining a gold open access future: Attitudes, behaviors, and funding scenarios among authors of academic scholarship. College and Research Libraries, 78(6). DOI 10.5860/crl.78.6.824
Universitas Riau. (2022). Laporan kinerja (LAKIN) Perpustakaan UNRI.
https://lib.unri.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/LAKIN-PERPUSTAKAAN-2022.pdf
Wood, E. (2021). Libraries full circle: The cross section of community, the public sphere, and third place. Public Library Quarterly, 40(2), 144-166. DOI 10.1080/01616846.2020.1737491
Yulianti, R. (2013). Perbaikan ergonomi lingkungan internal perpustakaan untuk peningkatan kenyamanan dan performansi kerja pemustaka: Studi kasus di Perpustakaan Jurusan Teknik Mesin dan Industri Fakultas Teknik UGM. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 9(1). DOI 10.22146/bip.7734