TAXONOMY BLOOM DALAM KETERAMPILAN BERBAHASA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Language skills are one of the keys to success in the process of learning foreign languages, to see success in one language skill certainly requires evaluation. This study uses Benjamin S Bloom's theory which can be used to see the level of cognitive ability and the suitability of the evaluation process to the learning outcomes that have been conceptualized by lecturers in the semester learning plan.
The purpose of this research is to analyze the quality of the Arabic language skills test questions, analyze the suitability of the Arabic language skills test questions to Bloom's taxonomic concepts, and analyze the suitability of the test questions to learning outcomes. By using purposive sampling techniques, this research includes quantitative research that departs from theory to the field to be tested for correctness.
This research proves that the quality of Arabic exam questions in five expertise courses in the Arabic Language and Literature study program, Faculty of Adab and Humanities is still in a low stage. This can be seen from the taxonomic level that the concept of making questions by lecturers is still in the realm of C1 to C3 only, meaning that the evaluation process by lecturers has not reached the highest level.Then the Arabic exam question items have not fully followed the concept of Bloom's taxonomy, this can be proven on the question sheets given by lecturers on average on one exam question sheet only tests at the C1 level for example defining. The achievement of learning from three aspects, namely knowledge, attitudes and skills is also not fully visible in the problem, this indicates that learning evaluation tends to look at cognitive abilities only.
The purpose of this research is to analyze the quality of the Arabic language skills test questions, analyze the suitability of the Arabic language skills test questions to Bloom's taxonomic concepts, and analyze the suitability of the test questions to learning outcomes. By using purposive sampling techniques, this research includes quantitative research that departs from theory to the field to be tested for correctness.
This research proves that the quality of Arabic exam questions in five expertise courses in the Arabic Language and Literature study program, Faculty of Adab and Humanities is still in a low stage. This can be seen from the taxonomic level that the concept of making questions by lecturers is still in the realm of C1 to C3 only, meaning that the evaluation process by lecturers has not reached the highest level.Then the Arabic exam question items have not fully followed the concept of Bloom's taxonomy, this can be proven on the question sheets given by lecturers on average on one exam question sheet only tests at the C1 level for example defining. The achievement of learning from three aspects, namely knowledge, attitudes and skills is also not fully visible in the problem, this indicates that learning evaluation tends to look at cognitive abilities only.
Article Details
How to Cite
“TAXONOMY BLOOM DALAM KETERAMPILAN BERBAHASA”. Tamaddun: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Sastra Islam 21, no. 1 (December 18, 2023): 91–111. Accessed March 19, 2025. https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/tamaddun/article/view/20191.
Section
Artikel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
How to Cite
“TAXONOMY BLOOM DALAM KETERAMPILAN BERBAHASA”. Tamaddun: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Sastra Islam 21, no. 1 (December 18, 2023): 91–111. Accessed March 19, 2025. https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/tamaddun/article/view/20191.
References
Alfin, Jauharoti., Keterampilan Dasar Berbahasa, Surabaya : PT Revka Petra Media, 2009
A.J, Nitko., Education Assessment of Student, (2nd ed). Ohio: Merril an imprint of Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs
B.Uno, Hamzah., Orientasi Baru dalam Psikologi Pembelajaran, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2010
Danim, Sudarwan., Psikologi Pendidikan (dalam Perspektif Baru), Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011.
Depdiknas. Panduan Penulisan Butir Soal. Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas Tahun 2018
Ditbin SMA Depdiknas, Panduan Analisis Butir Soal, Jakarta: Depdi-knas, 2008. Dimyati dan Mudjiono, Belajar dan Pembelajaran, Jakarta:Rineka Cipta, 2009.
Faruq, Umar,. Bahasa Arab Berbasis Peningkatan Pembelajaran HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills). Jurnal Al-Hikmah. Vol 8, 2020
Gunawan, Imam., dkk. 2012. Taksonomi Bloom - Revisi Ranah Kognitif : Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Penilaian. PE : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran. Vol 2 No 2
Haladyna, Thomas M. Writing Test Items to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking. Boston:Allyn and Bacon, 1997.
Idris, Zahara., dan Lisma Jamal, Pengantar Pendidikan I, Jakarta: Grasindo, 1992.
Khodijah, Nyayu., Orientasi Baru dalam Psikologi Pembelajaran, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2010.
Lisanuna, Vol 8, No 2 (2018)
Magdalena, Ina., dkk. 2020. Tiga Ranah Taksonomi Bloom Dalam Pendidikan. EDISI : Jurnal Edukasi dan Sains. Vol 2 No 1.
Magdalena, Ina., dkk. 2020. Tiga Ranah Taksonomi Bloom Dalam Pendidikan. EDISI : Jurnal Edukasi dan Sains. Vol 2 No 1.
Munip, Abdul., Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. Cet : 2017
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan., Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra, Yogyakarta: BPFE, 1988.
R Aiken, Lewis., Psychological Testing and Assessment, Eight Edition, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1994
A.J, Nitko., Education Assessment of Student, (2nd ed). Ohio: Merril an imprint of Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs
B.Uno, Hamzah., Orientasi Baru dalam Psikologi Pembelajaran, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2010
Danim, Sudarwan., Psikologi Pendidikan (dalam Perspektif Baru), Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011.
Depdiknas. Panduan Penulisan Butir Soal. Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas Tahun 2018
Ditbin SMA Depdiknas, Panduan Analisis Butir Soal, Jakarta: Depdi-knas, 2008. Dimyati dan Mudjiono, Belajar dan Pembelajaran, Jakarta:Rineka Cipta, 2009.
Faruq, Umar,. Bahasa Arab Berbasis Peningkatan Pembelajaran HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills). Jurnal Al-Hikmah. Vol 8, 2020
Gunawan, Imam., dkk. 2012. Taksonomi Bloom - Revisi Ranah Kognitif : Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Penilaian. PE : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran. Vol 2 No 2
Haladyna, Thomas M. Writing Test Items to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking. Boston:Allyn and Bacon, 1997.
Idris, Zahara., dan Lisma Jamal, Pengantar Pendidikan I, Jakarta: Grasindo, 1992.
Khodijah, Nyayu., Orientasi Baru dalam Psikologi Pembelajaran, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2010.
Lisanuna, Vol 8, No 2 (2018)
Magdalena, Ina., dkk. 2020. Tiga Ranah Taksonomi Bloom Dalam Pendidikan. EDISI : Jurnal Edukasi dan Sains. Vol 2 No 1.
Magdalena, Ina., dkk. 2020. Tiga Ranah Taksonomi Bloom Dalam Pendidikan. EDISI : Jurnal Edukasi dan Sains. Vol 2 No 1.
Munip, Abdul., Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. Cet : 2017
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan., Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra, Yogyakarta: BPFE, 1988.
R Aiken, Lewis., Psychological Testing and Assessment, Eight Edition, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1994