Analysis of the Consistency Policy Indonesia's Capital Relocation in the Pandemic Era
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 29, 2021
Keywords:
Narrative Policy Framework, Critical Discourse Analysis, Policy Making, National Capital, Media
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to look at the narrative of public policies related to the relocation of the Indonesian capital in the era of the Covid Pandemic 19. The narrative is seen through the development of opinions of government policy actors, political parties, and society. This study uses a Q-DAS (Qualitative Data Analysis Software) approach; besides the data in this study are media and social media data. The media have an essential role to play in shaping public narratives related to policymaking. The role of public narratives can create collective awareness in providing information about actor choices in policy decision-making. This research will conduct a Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) study, which can describe, explain the structure of political narratives in policymaking. The results showed that the Government's attitude was inconsistent regarding relocating the State Capital (IKN) after the Covid 19 Pandemic. The policy choices made by the Government were evident from the Government's narrative that temporarily suspended the relocation of the State Capital (IKN). The policy steps taken by the Government are the impact of the developing public narrative related to the relocation of the State Capital (IKN) in the Covid 19 Pandemic era. The factors affecting budget availability are Covid 19, weak public support, regulations, and aspects of environmental damage. These factors have developed in the public narrative on mass media and social media so that the Government took steps to delay the process of moving the country's capital city (IKN).
Article Details
How to Cite
Suswanta, S., Kurniawan, D., Nurmandi, A., & Salahudin, S. (2021). Analysis of the Consistency Policy Indonesia’s Capital Relocation in the Pandemic Era. Jurnal Studi Sosial Dan Politik, 5(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.19109/jssp.v5i1.7865
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Suswanta, S., Kurniawan, D., Nurmandi, A., & Salahudin, S. (2021). Analysis of the Consistency Policy Indonesia’s Capital Relocation in the Pandemic Era. Jurnal Studi Sosial Dan Politik, 5(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.19109/jssp.v5i1.7865
References
Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Leech, B. L., & Kimball, D. C. (2009). Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why. University of Chicago Press.
Bedsworth, L. W., Lowenthal, M. D., & Kastenberg, W. E. (2004). Uncertainty and regulation: The rhetoric of risk in the California low-level radioactive waste debate. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(3), 406-427.
Blair, B. D., & McCormack, L. (2016). Applying the narrative policy framework to the issues surrounding hydraulic fracturing within the news media: A research note. Research & Politics, 3(1), 2053168016628334.
Clemons, R. S., McBeth, M. K., Peterson, R. D., & Palmer, C. L. (2020). The narrative policy framework and sticky beliefs: an experiment studying islamophobia. international journal on minority and group rights, 27(3), 472-500.
Crow, D., & Jones, M. (2018). Narratives as tools for influencing policy change. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 217-234.
Crow, G., & Allan, G. (2014). Community life. Routledge.
Darma, Y. A. (2009). Analisis wacana kritis. Yrama Widya bekerja sama dengan Jurusan Pendididikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (FPBS UPI).
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
Glynn, C. J., & Huge, M. E. (2008). Public opinion. The international encyclopedia of communication.
Heikkila, T., Weible, C. M., & Pierce, J. J. (2014). Exploring the policy narratives and politics of hydraulic fracturing in New York. In The science of stories (pp. 185-205). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Ingold, K. (2017). The advocacy coalition framework: An overview of the research program. Theories of the policy process, 4, 135-172.
Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong?. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329-353.
Jones, M., Shanahan, E., & McBeth, M. (Eds.). (2014). The science of stories: Applications of the narrative policy framework in public policy analysis. Springer.
Jørgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. Sage.
McBeth, M. K., Jones, M. D., & Shanahan, E. A. (2014). The narrative policy framework. Theories of the policy process, 3, 225-266.
McBeth, M. K., Shanahan, E. A., & Jones, M. D. (2005). The science of storytelling: Measuring policy beliefs in Greater Yellowstone. Society and Natural Resources, 18(5), 413-429.
Ostrom, E. (2019). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In Theories of the policy process (pp. 21-64). Routledge.
Peterson, H. L., & Jones, M. D. (2016). Making sense of complexity: The narrative policy framework and agenda setting. In Handbook of public policy agenda setting. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rimmon-Kenan, S. (2003). Towards…: afterthoughts, almost twenty years later. In Narrative Fiction (pp. 151-166). Routledge.
Sabatier, P. A. (2007). The Need for Better Theories. Theories of the Policy Process. P. A. Sabatier. Boulder.
Scott, I. A., Scuffham, P., Gupta, D., Harch, T. M., Borchi, J., & Richards, B. (2018). Going digital: a narrative overview of the effects, quality and utility of mobile apps in chronic disease self-management. Australian Health Review, 44(1), 62-82.
Secko, D. M., Tlalka, S., Dunlop, M., Kingdon, A., & Amend, E. (2011). The unfinished science story: Journalist–audience interactions from the Globe and Mail’s online health and science sections. Journalism, 12(7), 814-831.
Shanahan, D., Cowie, R., Rogers, H., & Staines, K. (2018). Oral hairy leukoplakia in healthy immunocompetent patients: a small case series. Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 22(3), 335-339.
Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2011). Policy narratives and policy processes. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 535-561.
Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Lane, R. R. (2013). An angel on the wind: How heroic policy narratives shape policy realities. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 453-483.
Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Radaelli, C. M. (2018). The narrative policy framework. Theories of the policy process, 173-213.
Shanahan, E. A., McBeth, M. K., & Hathaway, P. L. (2011). Narrative policy framework: The influence of media policy narratives on public opinion. Politics & Policy, 39(3), 373-400.
Sumarni, Y. (2020). Pandemi Covid-19: Tantangan Ekonomi Dan Bisnis. Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 6(2), 46-58.
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge university press.
Bedsworth, L. W., Lowenthal, M. D., & Kastenberg, W. E. (2004). Uncertainty and regulation: The rhetoric of risk in the California low-level radioactive waste debate. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(3), 406-427.
Blair, B. D., & McCormack, L. (2016). Applying the narrative policy framework to the issues surrounding hydraulic fracturing within the news media: A research note. Research & Politics, 3(1), 2053168016628334.
Clemons, R. S., McBeth, M. K., Peterson, R. D., & Palmer, C. L. (2020). The narrative policy framework and sticky beliefs: an experiment studying islamophobia. international journal on minority and group rights, 27(3), 472-500.
Crow, D., & Jones, M. (2018). Narratives as tools for influencing policy change. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 217-234.
Crow, G., & Allan, G. (2014). Community life. Routledge.
Darma, Y. A. (2009). Analisis wacana kritis. Yrama Widya bekerja sama dengan Jurusan Pendididikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (FPBS UPI).
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
Glynn, C. J., & Huge, M. E. (2008). Public opinion. The international encyclopedia of communication.
Heikkila, T., Weible, C. M., & Pierce, J. J. (2014). Exploring the policy narratives and politics of hydraulic fracturing in New York. In The science of stories (pp. 185-205). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Ingold, K. (2017). The advocacy coalition framework: An overview of the research program. Theories of the policy process, 4, 135-172.
Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong?. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329-353.
Jones, M., Shanahan, E., & McBeth, M. (Eds.). (2014). The science of stories: Applications of the narrative policy framework in public policy analysis. Springer.
Jørgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. Sage.
McBeth, M. K., Jones, M. D., & Shanahan, E. A. (2014). The narrative policy framework. Theories of the policy process, 3, 225-266.
McBeth, M. K., Shanahan, E. A., & Jones, M. D. (2005). The science of storytelling: Measuring policy beliefs in Greater Yellowstone. Society and Natural Resources, 18(5), 413-429.
Ostrom, E. (2019). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In Theories of the policy process (pp. 21-64). Routledge.
Peterson, H. L., & Jones, M. D. (2016). Making sense of complexity: The narrative policy framework and agenda setting. In Handbook of public policy agenda setting. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rimmon-Kenan, S. (2003). Towards…: afterthoughts, almost twenty years later. In Narrative Fiction (pp. 151-166). Routledge.
Sabatier, P. A. (2007). The Need for Better Theories. Theories of the Policy Process. P. A. Sabatier. Boulder.
Scott, I. A., Scuffham, P., Gupta, D., Harch, T. M., Borchi, J., & Richards, B. (2018). Going digital: a narrative overview of the effects, quality and utility of mobile apps in chronic disease self-management. Australian Health Review, 44(1), 62-82.
Secko, D. M., Tlalka, S., Dunlop, M., Kingdon, A., & Amend, E. (2011). The unfinished science story: Journalist–audience interactions from the Globe and Mail’s online health and science sections. Journalism, 12(7), 814-831.
Shanahan, D., Cowie, R., Rogers, H., & Staines, K. (2018). Oral hairy leukoplakia in healthy immunocompetent patients: a small case series. Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 22(3), 335-339.
Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2011). Policy narratives and policy processes. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 535-561.
Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Lane, R. R. (2013). An angel on the wind: How heroic policy narratives shape policy realities. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 453-483.
Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Radaelli, C. M. (2018). The narrative policy framework. Theories of the policy process, 173-213.
Shanahan, E. A., McBeth, M. K., & Hathaway, P. L. (2011). Narrative policy framework: The influence of media policy narratives on public opinion. Politics & Policy, 39(3), 373-400.
Sumarni, Y. (2020). Pandemi Covid-19: Tantangan Ekonomi Dan Bisnis. Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 6(2), 46-58.
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge university press.