Analisis Penerimaan Learning Management System di Perguruan Tinggi Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

Main Article Content

Fitriadi Nurdin
Teguh Nur Santoso
Gamaruddin Gamaruddin

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the utilization of the Learning Management System (LMS) by students of Universitas Terbuka (UT). The primary focus of this research is to comprehend the usage of LMS in higher education, with the research locations divided into three geographical zones: West (UT-Jakarta, UT-Surabaya, UT-Serang, UT-Pekanbaru, UT-Palembang, UT-Aceh), Central (UT-Pontianak, UT-Samarinda, UT-Makassar, UT-Kendari), and East (UT-Majene, UT-Mataram, UT-Palu, UT-Ternate, UT-Jayapura). The focus of the research is to identify factors influencing students not to participate in online classes, particularly related to the suboptimal utilization of the Online Tutorial service. In this study, 400 respondents were surveyed, all of whom are UT students. Data analysis was conducted using the SmartPLS application, utilizing the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The model involves both external variables and those within the TAM. The research findings indicate that the system quality significantly influences the use of LMS by students. Based on the gathered information, universities should enhance and regularly update features within the LMS to better support users efficiently.

Article Details

How to Cite
Analisis Penerimaan Learning Management System di Perguruan Tinggi Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). (2023). JUSIFO (Jurnal Sistem Informasi), 9(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.19109/jusifo.v9i1.14012
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Analisis Penerimaan Learning Management System di Perguruan Tinggi Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). (2023). JUSIFO (Jurnal Sistem Informasi), 9(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.19109/jusifo.v9i1.14012

References

Abdullahi, A. M., Makhtar, M., & Safie, S. (2019). The patterns of accessing learning management system among students. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 13(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJEECS.V13.I1.PP15-21

Akbar, R., & Mukhtar, M. (2019). Evaluasi e-Tracer Study menggunakan HOT (Human-Organization-Technology) Fit Model. Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi), 3(2), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.35870/JTIK.V3I2.86
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2018.06.008

Al-Nuaimi, M. N., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). Learning management systems and technology acceptance models: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies 2021 26:5, 26(5), 5499–5533. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-021-10513-3

Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A., Alturki, U., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2019). Integrating Technology Acceptance Model With Innovation Diffusion Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Students’ Intention to Use E-Learning Systems. IEEE Access, 7, 26797–26809. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899368

Binyamin, S. S., Rutter, M. J., & Smith, S. (2018). The Influence of Computer Self-efficacy and Subjective Norms on the Students’ Use of Learning Management Systems at King Abdulaziz University. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(10), 693–699. https://doi.org/10.18178/IJIET.2018.8.10.1124

Bradley, V. M. (2020). Learning Management System (LMS) Use with Online Instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347911880_Learning_Management_System_LMS_Use_with_Online_Instruction

Çelik, H. E., & Yılmaz, V. (2011). Extending The Technology Acceptance Model For Adoption Of E-Shopping By Consumers In Turkey. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12(2). http://www.jecr.org/sites/default/files/12_2_p03.pdf

Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2021). Service Design and Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government Services: A Multidimensional Perspective. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 874–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/PUAR.13308

Chen, S.-C., Li, S.-H., & Li, C.-Y. (2011). Recent Related Research in Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(9). https://www.ajbmr.com/articlepdf/AJBMR_19_04i1n9a14.pdf

Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Examine Faculty Use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) In Higher Education Institutions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 210–232. https://jolt.merlot.org/Vol11no2/Fathema_0615.pdf

Fearnley, M. R., & Amora, J. T. (2020). Learning Management System Adoption in Higher Education Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(2), 89–106. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1265695

Fitriani, Y. (2020). Analisa Pemanfaatan Learning Management System (LMS) Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Online Selama Pandemi Covid-19. JISICOM (Journal of Information System, Informatics and Computing), 4(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.52362/JISICOM.V4I2.312

Govender, I., & Grange, I. R. (2015). Evaluating the early adoption of Moodle at a higher education institution. 14th European Conference on E-Learning ECEL. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320805629_Evaluating_the_early_adoption_of_Moodle_at_a_higher_education_institution

Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.12864

Jimenez, I. A. C., García, L. C. C., Violante, M. G., Marcolin, F., & Vezzetti, E. (2020). Commonly Used External TAM Variables in e-Learning, Agriculture and Virtual Reality Applications. Future Internet 2021, Vol. 13, Page 7, 13(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/FI13010007

Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., & Kakria, P. (2020). Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technology in Society, 60, 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2019.101212

Kraleva, R., Sabani, M., & Kralev, V. (2019). An analysis of some learning management systems. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9(4), 1190–1198. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335402358_An_Analysis_of_Some_Learning_Management_Systems

Mardiana, N., & Faqih, A. (2019). Pemanfaatan Learning Management System Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Matematika Diskrit. Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains Matematika (JES-MAT), 5(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.25134/JES-MAT.V5I1.1730

Maria, M. (2022). Naik jadi 412.697, UT Kokoh sebagai PT dengan Mahasiswa Terbanyak. Portal Universitas Terbuka. https://www.ut.ac.id/berita/2022/09/naik-jadi-412697-ut-kokoh-sebagai-pt-dengan-mahasiswa-terbanyak/


Schwarzer, R., & Warner, L. M. (2013). Perceived Self-Efficacy and its Relationship to Resilience. 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4939-3_10

Silvestre, E., Montes Miranda, A., & Figueroa Gutiérrez, V. (2022). Validation of a TAM Technology Acceptance Model in Dominican University Students. Educación, 31(60), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.202201.005

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-5915.2008.00192.X