Penerapan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dalam Memberikan Rekomendasi Pemenang Lomba MTQ
Main Article Content
Abstract
Musabaqah Tilawatil Qur'an is a competition in the field of syiar ’s content. The decision of the winners in MTQ competition was determined by the judges, especially in Merauke district, is currently carried out by the judges of each field, with the calculation of the value based on predetermined criteria. However, in its assessment, it has not applied priority to the criteria used to determine the winner. The results of the assessment given have not used data analysis methods that can be used to process assessment data into information that will support decision making in determining the winner of the competition. In order to reduce subjectivity in the assessment of participants, a decision support system is needed that has implemented a decision-making method. This study aims to build a decision support system using the Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) method. The results on the implementation of this method in a decision support system using an accuracy test indicated an accuracy of 95.6%. The accuracy value indicates that the MAUT method is an accurate data analysis method in analyzing the assessment data for determining the winner of the MTQ competition.
Article Details
How to Cite
Lamalewa, L., & Sumaryanti, L. (2021). Penerapan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dalam Memberikan Rekomendasi Pemenang Lomba MTQ. JUSIFO (Jurnal Sistem Informasi), 7(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.19109/jusifo.v7i1.8450
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Lamalewa, L., & Sumaryanti, L. (2021). Penerapan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dalam Memberikan Rekomendasi Pemenang Lomba MTQ. JUSIFO (Jurnal Sistem Informasi), 7(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.19109/jusifo.v7i1.8450
References
Aldo, D., Putra, N., & Munir, Z. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen dengan Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT). Jursima: Jurnal Sistem Informasi Dan Manajemen, 7(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.47024/js.v7i2.180
Alfiarini, A., & Primadasa, Y. (2020). Penerapan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory Untuk Menganalisa Pemberian Bantuan Raskin. Techno.Com, 19(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.33633/tc.v19i1.3136
Apriani, W. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pimpinan dengan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) di PT Sagami Indonesia. Jurnal Mantik, 3(2), 10–20. http://iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/article/view/117
Bahrudin, B., & Kumaidi, K. (2014). Model Asesmen Musabaqah Tilawah Al-Quran (MTQ) Cabang Tilawah. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i2.2858
Hadinata, N. (2018). Implementasi Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Menentukan Penerima Kredit. Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi Dan Komputer), 7(2), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v7i2.562
Hidayat, M., Jusia, P. A., & Amroni, A. (2018). Analisa dan Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Penerimaan Karyawan PT Dos Ni Roha Jambi Menggunakan Metode MAUT (Multi Attribute Utility Theory). Processor, 13(1), 1200–1212. http://ejournal.stikom-db.ac.id/index.php/processor/article/view/381
Jannah, R., & Lusiana, L. (2015). Aplikasi Penerimaan Karyawan dengan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory. SATIN: Sains Dan Teknologi Informasi, 1(2), 79–89. http://jurnal.stmik-amik-riau.ac.id/index.php/satin/article/view/110
Limbong, T., & Simarmata, J. (2020). Determining Effective Subjects Online Learning (Study and Examination) with Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Method. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 4(2), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v4i2.1851
Lubis, J. I., Efendi, B., & Syafnur, A. (2021). Penerapan Metode AHP untuk Menentukan Juara MTQ Di Kecamatan Tebing Tinggi Kota. Journal of Science and Social Research, 4(1), 34–38. http://jurnal.goretanpena.com/index.php/JSSR/article/view/475
Ramadiani, R., Hatta, H. R., Novita, N., & Azainil, A. (2018). Comparison of Two Methods Between TOPSIS and MAUT In Determining BIDIKMISI Scholarship. 2018 Third International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAC.2018.8780455
Ramadiani, R., & Rahmah, A. (2019). Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan tenaga kesehatan teladan menggunakan metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory. Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.26594/register.v5i1.1273
Satria, E., Atina, N., Simbolon, M. E., & Windarto, A. P. (2018). SPK: Algoritma Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) pada Destinasi Tujuan Wisata Lokal di Kota Sidamanik. Computer Engineering, Science and System Journal, 3(2), 168–172. https://doi.org/10.24114/cess.v3i2.9954
Situmorang, Y. A., Dalimunthe, N., Parlina, I., & Lubis, M. R. (2018). Penerapan Metode Maut pada Pemilihan Bimbingan Intensif Terbaik di Pematangsiantar. KOMIK (Konferensi Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Komputer), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30865/komik.v2i1.934
Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An Analysis of Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods. ORSTW: Operations Research Society of Taiwan, 10(2), 56–66. http://www.orstw.org.tw/ijor/6_volume10_no2.html
Widodo, W., & Nastoto, I. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Multi Atribute Utility Theory (MAUT) untuk Penentuan Bantuan Rumah Tinggal Sehat. Indonesian Journal of Business Intelligence (IJUBI), 1(2), 76. https://doi.org/10.21927/ijubi.v1i2.911
Alfiarini, A., & Primadasa, Y. (2020). Penerapan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory Untuk Menganalisa Pemberian Bantuan Raskin. Techno.Com, 19(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.33633/tc.v19i1.3136
Apriani, W. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pimpinan dengan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) di PT Sagami Indonesia. Jurnal Mantik, 3(2), 10–20. http://iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/article/view/117
Bahrudin, B., & Kumaidi, K. (2014). Model Asesmen Musabaqah Tilawah Al-Quran (MTQ) Cabang Tilawah. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i2.2858
Hadinata, N. (2018). Implementasi Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Menentukan Penerima Kredit. Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi Dan Komputer), 7(2), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v7i2.562
Hidayat, M., Jusia, P. A., & Amroni, A. (2018). Analisa dan Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Penerimaan Karyawan PT Dos Ni Roha Jambi Menggunakan Metode MAUT (Multi Attribute Utility Theory). Processor, 13(1), 1200–1212. http://ejournal.stikom-db.ac.id/index.php/processor/article/view/381
Jannah, R., & Lusiana, L. (2015). Aplikasi Penerimaan Karyawan dengan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory. SATIN: Sains Dan Teknologi Informasi, 1(2), 79–89. http://jurnal.stmik-amik-riau.ac.id/index.php/satin/article/view/110
Limbong, T., & Simarmata, J. (2020). Determining Effective Subjects Online Learning (Study and Examination) with Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Method. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 4(2), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v4i2.1851
Lubis, J. I., Efendi, B., & Syafnur, A. (2021). Penerapan Metode AHP untuk Menentukan Juara MTQ Di Kecamatan Tebing Tinggi Kota. Journal of Science and Social Research, 4(1), 34–38. http://jurnal.goretanpena.com/index.php/JSSR/article/view/475
Ramadiani, R., Hatta, H. R., Novita, N., & Azainil, A. (2018). Comparison of Two Methods Between TOPSIS and MAUT In Determining BIDIKMISI Scholarship. 2018 Third International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAC.2018.8780455
Ramadiani, R., & Rahmah, A. (2019). Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan tenaga kesehatan teladan menggunakan metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory. Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.26594/register.v5i1.1273
Satria, E., Atina, N., Simbolon, M. E., & Windarto, A. P. (2018). SPK: Algoritma Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) pada Destinasi Tujuan Wisata Lokal di Kota Sidamanik. Computer Engineering, Science and System Journal, 3(2), 168–172. https://doi.org/10.24114/cess.v3i2.9954
Situmorang, Y. A., Dalimunthe, N., Parlina, I., & Lubis, M. R. (2018). Penerapan Metode Maut pada Pemilihan Bimbingan Intensif Terbaik di Pematangsiantar. KOMIK (Konferensi Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Komputer), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30865/komik.v2i1.934
Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An Analysis of Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods. ORSTW: Operations Research Society of Taiwan, 10(2), 56–66. http://www.orstw.org.tw/ijor/6_volume10_no2.html
Widodo, W., & Nastoto, I. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Multi Atribute Utility Theory (MAUT) untuk Penentuan Bantuan Rumah Tinggal Sehat. Indonesian Journal of Business Intelligence (IJUBI), 1(2), 76. https://doi.org/10.21927/ijubi.v1i2.911