Evaluation Of Faculty Teaching Performance in UndergraduateIslamic Education Management Programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19109/tadrib.v12i3.5623Keywords:
Performance Evaluation, Faculty Teaching, Islamic EducationAbstract
Higher education institutions are required to continuously improve learning quality, in which lecturers play a central role in designing, implementing, and evaluating instruction. This study aims to evaluate the teaching performance of lecturers in the Bachelor’s Program in Islamic Education Management at UIN Raden Fatah Palembang using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model. A mixed-methods approach was employed by integrating quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data were collected through student questionnaires to measure satisfaction with teaching performance, while qualitative data were obtained from interviews, observations, and document analysis involving program leaders, lecturers, and students. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that lecturers’ teaching performance is generally in the “good” category. Instructional objectives are clearly defined and aligned with the Outcome-Based Education curriculum and institutional vision; inputs are supported by qualified lecturers, sufficient experience, adequate facilities, and relevant academic policies; the learning process is effectively implemented through varied teaching methods, positive interactions, and transparent assessment; and learning outcomes show that students demonstrate understanding, active participation, and achievement of course objectives. This study concludes that teaching performance at UIN Raden Fatah Palembang is satisfactory but requires continuous improvement, particularly in strengthening digital competence, optimizing educational technology, standardizing learning objective communication, and enhancing innovative teaching practices to improve educational quality and graduate competitiveness.
Downloads
References
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (2018). Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: IBFIM.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2018). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Pearson.
Arikunto, S. (2020). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2022). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP model for quality evaluation at university level. Quality Assurance in Education, 26(1), 74–87.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2019). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Open University Press.
Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in University Assessment. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute.
Djamarah, S. B. (2018). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
Harden, R. M. (2018). Outcome-based education. Medical Teacher, 40(5).
Hidayat. (2023). Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Digital. Prenadamedia.
Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2016). Students’ acceptance of tablet PCs in higher education: A structural equation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.015
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2016). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is “enhanced” and how do we know? Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.993136
Majid, A. (2017). Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mangkunegara, A. A. A. P. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyasa, E. (2021). Menjadi Guru Profesional. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nasution, H., Siregar, E., & Rajagukguk, J. (2021). The effect of teaching effectiveness on student achievement in higher education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1819(1), 12071. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1819/1/012071
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2018). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. (2020).
Pratama, H., Azman, M. N. A., Zakaria, N. A., & Khairudin, M. (2021). The effectiveness of project-based learning in improving higher-order thinking skills in higher education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1779(1), 12060. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1779/1/012060
Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: European Commission.
Rivai, V., & Sagala, E. J. (2019). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Rusman. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sallis, E. (2015). Total Quality Management in Education (3rd Edition). London: Routledge.
Samani, M., & Hariyanto. (2017). Konsep dan Model Pendidikan Karakter. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sani, R. A. (2019). Pembelajaran Berbasis HOTS. Bumi Aksara.
Sanjaya, W. (2016). Strategi Pembelajaran. Kencana.
Sihotang, H. (2019). Learning interaction. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1387.
Siregar, E. (2020). Lecturer competence. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1462.
Slameto. (2018). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sudaryono. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Kencana.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian. Alfabeta.
Suprijono, A. (2017). Cooperative Learning: Teori dan Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Suyanto. (2016). Menjadi Guru Profesional: Strategi Meningkatkan Kualifikasi dan Kualitas Guru di Era Global. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Tight, M. (2019). Student retention and engagement in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(5), 689–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1378272
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2017). Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use: Its meaning and measurement. Computers & Education, 94, 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.009
Uno, H. B. (2019). Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya: Analisis di Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Usman, H. (2019). Manajemen Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2016). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475–511. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314564881
Wibowo, A. (2017). Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Widodo, A. (2020). Student satisfaction. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1511.
Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A. (2019). The Program Evaluation Standards: A Guide for Evaluators and Evaluation Users (3rd Edition). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Zhang, G. (2019). CIPP model application. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 23(4), 153–176.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Al Haqqi, Fitri Oviyanti, Yuniar, Ahmad Zainuri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.