About the Journal

Focus

The journal is dedicated to advancing scholarly works that explore the interplay between Islamic education, pedagogical innovations, and contextual dynamics informed by local wisdom.

Scope

Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam focuses on publishing scholarly articles that examine the interconnection between Islamic education, pedagogical innovation, and contextual dynamics rooted in local wisdom. The journal emphasizes contributions that align with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), promote inclusivity, and foster innovation, with its scope covering, but not limited to, the following areas: 

1. Islamic Education and Pedagogy (This area covers learning, learning outcomes, and concepts in Islamic education, with a focus on Islamic education materials (the Qur'an, hadith, aqidah, akhlak, fiqh, history of the Prophet), educators and students (their competencies, roles, and relationships), as well as learning methods (lectures, question and answer sessions, discussions, halaqah, and other active methods), including the design and renewal of Islamic education curricula rooted in local wisdom, learning models in Islamic schools and Islamic boarding schools, learning innovations and technology integration, digital and hybrid pedagogy for Islamic learning, and strategies for teaching the Qur'an, hadith, and Islamic values in contemporary classrooms).
2. Islamic Education and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (This section highlights the contribution of Islamic education to SDG 4: quality education for all; gender equality and inclusive Islamic education in line with SDG 5; reducing educational disparities and fostering social inclusion under SDG 10; peace education and global citizenship within Islamic contexts in relation to SDG 16; environmental education grounded in Islamic values addressing SDG 13; as well as discourses on human rights and ethics in Islamic education).
3. Policy, Leadership, and Management (This scope  includes governance and Policy in Islamic Educational Institutions, Educational Leadership and School as well as Islamic Higher Education Management, Quality Management of Islamic Education, Funding and Sustainability of Islamic Educational Institutions, and Public–Private Partnerships in the Development of Islamic Education).
4. Islamic Education in Global and Multicultural Contexts (This area encompasses comparative studies of Islamic education systems in Southeast Asia and beyond; Islamic education in multicultural and diaspora communities; intercultural and interfaith dialogue through Islamic education; the integration of local wisdom into contemporary educational practices; and the inclusion of minority and marginalized groups within Islamic schooling).
5. Assessment, Innovation, and Research in Islamic Education (This section covers the development of assessment instruments in Islamic education; action research and professional development of Islamic education teachers; the use of artificial intelligence (AI), big data, and digital technologies in Islamic education; and evaluation of programs and policies in Islamic education). 

Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam encourages the submission of interdisciplinary manuscripts that critically engage with Islamic scholarly traditions while integrating contemporary educational approaches. The journal particularly highlights contributions that explore the nexus of Islamic education, pedagogical innovation, and contextual dynamics rooted in local wisdom, aligned with principles of inclusivity, sustainability (SDGs), and global relevance, thereby offering meaningful contributions to academic communities at local, regional, and international levels.

Peer Review Process

Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam encourages the submission of interdisciplinary manuscripts that critically engage with Islamic scholarly traditions while integrating contemporary educational approaches. The journal particularly highlights contributions that explore the nexus of Islamic education, pedagogical innovation, and contextual dynamics rooted in local wisdom, aligned with principles of inclusivity, sustainability (SDGs), and global relevance, thereby offering meaningful contributions to academic communities at local, regional, and international levels.

Review Policies

Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal. Every paper submitted to Tadrib for publication is subject to peer review. The peer review in this journal is an evaluation of the submitted paper by two or more individuals of similar competence to the author. It aims to determine the academic paper's suitability for publication. The peer review method is employed to maintain standards of quality and provide credibility for the papers. The peer review at Tadrib proceeds in nine steps, with the description as follows:

1. Submission of Paper. The corresponding or submitting author submits the paper to the journal. This is carried out via an online system supported by the Open Journal System (OJS). But in order to facilitate authors, Tadrib temporarily also accepts paper submissions by email.

2. Editorial Office Assessment. The submitted paper is first assessed by Tadrib 's editor. The editor checks whether it is suitable for the journal's focus and scope. The paper's composition and arrangement are evaluated against the journal's author guidelines to make sure it includes the required sections and stylizations. In addition, an assessment of the minimum required quality of the paper for publication begins at this step, including one that assesses whether there is a major methodological flaw. Every submitted paper that passes this step will be checked by Turnitin to measure the similarity index, which leads to plagiarism, before being reviewed by reviewers.

3. Appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief. The Editor-in-Chief checks if the paper is appropriate for the journal, sufficiently original, interesting, and significant for publication. If not, the paper may be rejected without being reviewed any further.

4. Invitation to Reviewers. The handling editor sends invitations to individuals who he or she believes would be appropriate reviewers (also known as referees) based on expertise, the closeness of research interest, and no conflict of interest consideration. The peer review process at Tadrib involves a community of experts who are qualified and able to perform reasonably impartial reviews. The impartiality is also maintained by the double-blind peer review employed in this journal. That said, the reviewer does not know the author's identity; conversely, the author does not know the reviewer's identity. The paper is sent to reviewers anonymously.

5. Response to Invitations. Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their own expertise, conflicts of interest, and availability. They then decide whether to accept or decline. In the invitation letter, the editor may ask the potential reviewer for the suggestion of an alternative reviewer when he or she declines to review.

6. A review is Conducted. The reviewers allocate time to read the paper several times. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewers may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. Otherwise, they will read the paper several more times, taking notes so as to build a detailed point-by-point review. The review is then submitted to the journal with a recommendation to accept or reject it, or else with a request for revision (usually flagged as either major or minor) before it is reconsidered.

7. The journal evaluates the Reviews. The Editor-in-Chief and handling editor consider all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. If the reviews differ widely between both reviewers, the handling editor may invite an additional reviewer so as to obtain an extra opinion before making a decision.

8. The Decision is Communicated. The editor sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. Reviewer comments are sent anonymously to the corresponding author to take the necessary actions and responses. At this point, reviewers are also sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review.

9. Final Steps

If accepted, the paper is sent to copy-editing. Suppose the article is rejected or sent back to the author for either major or minor revision. In that case, the handling editor will include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. The author should make corrections and revise the paper per the reviewers' comments and instructions.

After revision has been made, the author should resubmit the revised paper to the editor.

If the paper was sent back for revision, the reviewers should expect to receive the revised version, unless they have opted out of further participation. However, where only minor changes were requested this follow-up review might be done by the handling editor.

If the editor is happy with the revised paper, it is considered to be accepted. The accepted papers will be published online, and all are freely available as downloadable pdf files.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Indexing

Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, with registered number  P-ISSN: 2477-5436 (Print), E-ISSN: 2549-6433 (Online) have been indexed on

1. SINTA;
2. Google Scholar;
3. Moraref;
4. GARUDA;
5. Dimension;
6. ROAD;
7. MENDELEY;
8. Crossref;

Plagiarism Check

Plagiarism screening will be conducted by OJS Editorial Board using Grammarly Plagiarism Checker and CrossCheck plagiarism screening service powered by Turnitin.com For CrossCheck plagiarism screening service Klik This

Article Processing Charges (APCs) & Article Submission Charges

Based on the decision of the Editorial Board of Tadrib Journal: Journal of Islamic Education does not charge any publication fees.

Article Submission Fee: Free

1. We greatly appreciate collaborative articles with a minimum of three authors from two different affiliations.
2. Collaborative articles with three different affiliations and authors from other countries receive special priority.

Digital Preservation

Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam strives for the constant availability of published articles and online accessibility. With this in mind, Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam content is continually archived and preserved in the Internet Library Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Deposit Policy

The submitted version, accepted version, and published version can be deposited in an institutional or other repository of the author’s choice at any time. A few to mention, author(s) may deposit and use the document as follows:

• on the personal website
• on the company or institutional repository
• on subject repositories
• With individuals requesting personal use for teaching and training within the author's institution, and as part of an author's grant applications, theses/doctorate submissions, etc.

Please visit the journal Copyright Notice, and make sure that you consult all of the related policies on the website to prevent any disputes or doubts. If you have any inquiries, contact Editor Tadrib: tadrib_uin@radenfatah.ac.id

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Publication Ethics and Misconduct

Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam is a peer-reviewed journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, as well as allegations of research misconduct, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer,­ and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is, therefore, important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society.  

Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung as the publisher of Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously, and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

Allegations of Research Misconduct

Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, citation manipulation, or plagiarism in producing, performing, or reviewing research and writing the article by authors, or in reporting research results. When authors are found to have been involved with research misconduct or other serious irregularities involving articles that have been published in scientific journals, Editors have a responsibility to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record.

In cases of suspected misconduct, the Editors and Editorial Board will use the best practices of COPE to assist them in resolving the complaint and addressing the misconduct fairly. This will include an investigation of the allegation by the Editors. A submitted manuscript that is found to contain such misconduct will be rejected. In cases where a published paper is found to contain such misconduct, a retraction can be published and will be linked to the original article.

The first step involves determining the validity of the allegation and an assessment of whether the allegation is consistent with the definition of research misconduct. This initial step also involves determining whether the individuals alleging misconduct have relevant conflicts of interest. 

If scientific misconduct or the presence of other substantial research irregularities is a possibility, the allegations are shared with the corresponding author, who, on behalf of all of the coauthors, is requested to provide a detailed response. After the response is received and evaluated, additional review and involvement of experts (such as statistical reviewers) may be obtained. For cases in which it is unlikely that misconduct has occurred, clarifications, additional analyses, or both, published as letters to the editor, and often including a correction notice and correction to the published article, are sufficient. 

Institutions are expected to conduct an appropriate and thorough investigation of allegations of scientific misconduct. Ultimately, authors, journals, and institutions have an important obligation to ensure the accuracy of the scientific record. By responding appropriately to concerns about scientific misconduct and taking necessary actions based on the evaluation of these concerns, such as corrections, retractions, and retractions, the JIPF Al-Biruni journal will continue to fulfill the responsibilities of ensuring the validity and integrity of the scientific record.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Complaints and Appeals

The Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam will have a clear procedure for handling complaints against the journal, Editorial Staff, Editorial Board, or Publisher. The complaints will be clarified to respected personnel concerning the case of a complaint. The scope of complaints includes anything related to the journal business process, i.e., editorial process, found citation manipulation, unfair editor/reviewer, peer-review manipulation, etc. The complaint cases will be processed according to COPE guidelines.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions 

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness 

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality 

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity 

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources 

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest 

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards 

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention 

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should, in any event, be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication. Authors are responsible for data reproducibility.

Originality and Plagiarism 

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication 

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources 

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship and Contributorship of the Article

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors.

Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest 

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published work 

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Ethical Oversight 

If the research work involves chemicals, humans, animals, procedures, or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript in order to obey the ethical conduct of research using animals and human subjects. If required, Authors must provide legal, ethical clearance from an association or legal organization. 

If the research involves confidential data and business/marketing practices, authors should clearly justify this matter whether the data or information will be hidden securely or not. 

Screening for Plagiarism

Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Editorial board recognizes that plagiarism is not acceptable and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) upon identification of plagiarism/similarities in articles submitted for publication in Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam. Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam will use Turnitin's originality checking software as the tool in detecting similarities of texts in article manuscripts and the final version articles ready for publication. A maximum of 30% of similarities is allowed for the submitted papers. Should we find more than 30% of the similarity index, the article will be returned to the author for correction and resubmission.

Definition:

Plagiarism involves the "use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one's own original work."

Policy:

Papers must be original, unpublished, and not pending publication elsewhere. Any material taken verbatim from another source needs to be clearly identified as different from the present original text by (1) indentation, (2) use of quotation marks, and (3) identification of the source.

Any text of an amount exceeding fair use standards (herein defined as more than two or three sentences or the equivalent thereof) or any graphic material reproduced from another source requires permission from the copyright holder and, if feasible, the original author(s) and also requires identification of the source; e.g., previous publication.

When plagiarism is identified, the Editor in Chief responsible for the review of this paper and will agree on measures according to the extent of plagiarism detected in the paper in agreement with the following guidelines:

Level of Plagiarism

Minor:

A short section of another article is plagiarized without any significant data or idea taken from the other paper

Action: A warning is given to the authors and a request to change the text and properly cite the original article is made

Intermediate: A significant portion of a paper is plagiarized without proper citation to the original paper

Action: The submitted article is rejected, and the authors are forbidden to submit further articles for one year

Severe: A significant portion of a paper is plagiarized, which involves reproducing original results or ideas presented in another publication

Action: The paper is rejected, and the authors are forbidden to submit further articles for five years.

It is understood that all authors are responsible for the content of their submitted paper as they all read and understand Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam's Copyright and Licensing Terms. If a penalty is imposed for plagiarism, all authors will be subject to the same penalty.

If the second case of plagiarism by the same author(s) is identified, a decision on the measures to be enforced will be made by the Editorial board (Editor-in-Chief, and Editorial members) with the Chair of the Editor in Chief. The author(s) might be forbidden to submit further articles forever.

This policy also applies to material reproduced from another publication by the same author(s). If an author uses text or figures that have previously been published, the corresponding paragraphs or figures should be identified and the previous publication referenced. It is understood that in the case of a review paper or a paper of a tutorial nature much of the material was previously published.

The author should identify the source of the previously published material and obtain permission from the original author and the publisher. If an author submits a manuscript to Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam with significant overlap with a manuscript submitted to another journal simultaneously, and this overlap is discovered during the review process or after the publication of both papers, the editor of the other journal is notified and the case is treated as a severe plagiarism case. Significant overlap means the use of identical or almost identical figures and identical or slightly modified text for one-half or more of the paper. For self-plagiarism of less than one-half of the paper but more than one-tenth of the paper, the case shall be treated as intermediate plagiarism. If self-plagiarism is confined to the methods section, the case shall be considered as minor plagiarism.

If an author uses some of his previously published material to clarify the presentation of new results, the previously published material shall be identified and the difference to the present publication shall be mentioned. Permission to republish must be obtained from the copyright holder. In the case of a manuscript that was originally published in conference proceedings and then is submitted for publication in Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam either in identical or in expanded form, the authors must identify the name of the conference proceedings and the date of the publication and obtain permission to republish from the copyright holder. The editor may decide not to accept this paper for publication.

However, an author shall be permitted to use material from an unpublished presentation, including visual displays, in a subsequent journal publication. In the case of a publication being submitted, that was originally published in another language, the title, date, and journal of the original publication must be identified by the authors, and the copyright must be obtained. The editor may accept such a translated publication to bring it to the attention of a wider audience. The editor may select a specific paper that has been published (e.g., a “historic” paper) for republication in order to provide a better perspective of a series of papers published in one issue of Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam. This republication shall be clearly identified as such, and the date and journal of the original publication shall be given, and the permission of the author(s) and the publisher shall be obtained.

The Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam layout editor for the Journal is responsible for maintaining the list of authors subjected to penalties and will check that no authors of a submitted paper are on this list. If a banned author is identified, the layout editor will inform the Editor-in-Chief, who will take appropriate measures. This policy will be posted on the website with the instructions for submitting a manuscript, and a copy will be sent to the authors with the confirmation email upon initial receipt of their original manuscript.

Withdrawal of Manuscript

The author is not allowed to withdraw submitted or published manuscripts (unless there are compelling reasons), because the withdrawal is a waste of valuable resources that editors and reviewers spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscripts and works invested by the publisher.

If the author still requests withdrawal of his or her manuscript, the author will be asked to submit an "Article Withdrawal Form" signed by all authors (or the corresponding author of the manuscript) stating the reasons for manuscript withdrawal. Authors must not assume that their manuscript has been withdrawn until they have received appropriate notification to this effect from the editorial office. Please contact Tadrib at tadrib_uin@radenfatah.ac.id

for the "Article withdrawal form."

However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted or published manuscript from one journal if it is accepted by another journal.

Correction and Retraction

Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam takes its responsibility to maintain the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record of our content for all end users very seriously. Changes to articles after they have been published online may only be made under the circumstances outlined below. Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam places great importance on the authority of articles after they have been published, and our policy is based on best practices in the academic publishing community.

An erratum is a statement by the authors of the original paper that briefly describes any correction(s) resulting from errors or omissions. Any effects on the conclusions of the paper should be noted. The corrected article is not removed from the online journal, but a notice of erratum is given. The erratum is made freely available to all readers and is linked to the corrected article.