Instrumen Literasi Digital Guru Menggunakan Model Rasch

Main Article Content

Weni Lestari
Indah Wigati
Moh Ismail Sholeh
Desi Pramita

Abstract

The development of digital technology provides a significant role in the learning process. However, its utilization is very closely related to the skills possessed by the teacher. These skills can be identified with digital literacy instruments. This study aims to measure the accuracy and feasibility of digital literacy instruments for teachers. The type of research used is descriptive quantitative with a non-experimental/survey research design. The research sample consisted of 96 teachers teaching at the State Aliyah Madrasah in Palembang City, South Sumatra. The research data was obtained from an analysis of the teacher's digital literacy instrument questionnaire. Data were analyzed using the Rasch model. The results showed that the item separation value was 3.54 where the instrument could identify the respondent's group. The item reliability value is 0.93 which is categorized as very good. The Cronbach Alpha value is 0.90 which indicates that the value is very good and consistent. The raw variance explained by measures is 31.8% where the instrument is actually able to measure what it should measure. The classification of the difficulty level of the instrument categorized as very difficult, difficult, easy, and very easy. The results of the DIF analysis show that there are no items that are biased or only biased and detrimental to one gender. So it can be concluded that the instrument meets the requirements and can be used as material to measure the digital literacy abilities of teachers at MAN Palembang City.

Article Details

How to Cite
Instrumen Literasi Digital Guru Menggunakan Model Rasch. (2022). Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 6(2), 104-113. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v6i2.15019
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Instrumen Literasi Digital Guru Menggunakan Model Rasch. (2022). Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 6(2), 104-113. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v6i2.15019

References

Airasian, P.W, M. G. & Gay, L. R. (2012). Educational research: Compentencies for analysis and application. Pearson Education, Inc.
Azwar, S. (2006). Reliabilitas, Validitas, Interpretasi dan Komputasi. Liberty.
Bond, T. & Fox, C. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd). LEA.
Bush, B., & Hurlbut, A. (2020). Measuring digital literacy: Instrument development to assess technology usage and integration for continuous program improvement. Society for Information Technology & Teacher, 981–985. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/215849/
Chan, S. W., Ismail, Z., & Sumintono, B. (2014). A Rasch Model Analysis on Secondary Students’ Statistical Reasoning Ability in Descriptive Statistics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.658
Cote, T., & Milliner, B. (2018). A Survey of Efl Teachers’Digital Literacy: a Report From a Japanese University. Ceeol.Com, 18(4), 71–89. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=707768
Darmana, A., Sutiani, A., Nasution, H. A., Ismanisa*, I., & Nurhaswinda, N. (2021). Analysis of Rasch Model for the Validation of Chemistry National Exam Instruments. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i3.19618
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Dougherty, B. E., Nichols, J. J., & Nichols, K. K. (2011). Rasch analysis of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 52(12), 8630–8635. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8027
Fanreza, R. (2018). The Quality of Teachers in Digital Era. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Community Development, 461–463. http://doi: 10.2991/amca-18.2018.128.
Gorin, J. S., & Embretson, S. E. (2007). Item Response Theory And Rasch Models. In D. McKay (Ed.) Handbook of research methods in abnormal and clinical psychology. Sage Publications.
Imania, K. A., & Bariah, S. K. (2019). Rancangan Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Pembelajaran Berbasis Daring. Jurnal Petik, 5(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.31980/jpetik.v5i1.445
Lestari, S., Kurnianingsih, I., Al-Azhar, P., & Studi Ilmu Perpustakaan Universitas Yarsi, P. (2018). Pengukuran Kemampuan Literasi Digital Orang Tua Menggunakan Instant Digital Competence Assessment (Instant DCA). In Bibliotech : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi (Vol. 3, Issue 2).
Li, M., & Yu, Z. (2022). Teachers’ Satisfaction, Role, and Digital Literacy during the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 14, Issue 3). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031121
Linacre, J. M. (2007). A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS Rasch-Model Computer Programs. MESA Press.
Linacre, J. M. (2011). A User’s guide to WINSTEPS Ministeps; Rasch-model Computer Program. Program Manual 3.73.
Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and Tools for Digital Literacy Development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05040249
Milovanovic, A., Cvetković, B. N., & Maksimović, J. (2020). Digital literacy an important component of future teacher's education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345695284
Mulyatiningsih, E. (2011). Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. Alfabeta.
Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill.
Ridzuan, M. F., Lim, H. L., Ahmad Fozee, F. A., & Mohd Nasser, S. N. A. (2020). Rasch Analysis Model: Reliability and Validity of Superitem Test Instrument. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v9-i4/8166
Rozeha, A. R., Azami, Z. & Saidfudin, M. (2007). Application of Rasch Measurement in Evaluation of Learning Outcomes: A Case Study in Electrical Engineering, Regional Conference on Engineering Mathematics, Mechanics, Manufacturing & Architecture 2007 (EM3ARC).
Spires, H., & Bartlett, M. (2012). Digital literacies and learning: Designing a path forward. Friday Institute White Paper Series. NC State University.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sumintono, B & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan RASCH pada assessment pendidikan. Trim Komunikata.
Wigati, I., Faisal, F., & Astuti, R. T. (2022). Determining digital literacy among teacher from gender perspective through the Rasch model. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 16(3), 330–335. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v16i3.20409
Wigati, I., & Fithriyah, M. (2022). Post Covid-19 Strategy Through Supporting Teacher Digital Literacy as the Sustainable Decision to Enhance Education System: Indonesia Case Study. 2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications, DASA 2022, 851–857. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA54658.2022.9765309