Analysis of Academic Ability Test (TKA) Policy at SMAN 1 and SMAN 2 Palangka Raya

Authors

  • Riya Septi Ayana Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Meltiani Nordianingsih Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Tanti Nurmala Sari Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Dakir Dakir Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Luqman Baehaqi Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19109/tadrib.v11i2.32567

Keywords:

Academic Ability Test, Education Policy

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Academic Ability Test (TKA) as a new policy of the Ministry of Education in 2025 which is applied to grade XII students, focusing on its implementation in SMAN 1 Palangka Raya and SMAN 2 Palangka Raya. TKA is designed to measure students' critical, logical, and analytical thinking skills, as well as being an instrument for mapping the quality of education and the basis for decision-making for students, schools, and the government. This research uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method based on the PRISMA 2020 protocol, and is strengthened with a literature review to provide a comprehensive understanding of the concepts, objectives, benefits, and challenges of TKA. Field findings show that the implementation of TKA in both schools runs in an orderly manner, but presents diverse experiences for students. Subjects such as Mathematics, Physics, and English (reading section) are the most difficult, while Indonesian and basic English are considered more relevant to the learning material. Processing time is the main obstacle, especially for questions that require in-depth analysis. In addition, some students feel that some questions do not fully fit the grid, and their preparation is hampered by the school's heavy academic load. Overall, TKA has an important role in mapping students' academic abilities, but improvements are needed in terms of exam duration, student readiness, and instrument suitability so that this policy can run more effectively and support the improvement of the quality of education at the high school level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.521261

Bishop, J. H. (1997). The effect of national standards and curriculum-based exams on achievement. American Economic Review, 87(2), 260–264.

Braun, H., & Kanjee, A. (2006). Using assessment to improve education in developing nations. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 507–545. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043003507

Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2014). Beyond the Bubble Test: How Performance Assessments Support 21st Century Learning. Asia Society and Stanford University.

Firestone, W. A., & Schorr, R. Y. (2004). Introduction: The ambiguity of test preparation. Educational Policy, 18(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904803260029

Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(2), 169–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594032000121270

Koretz, D. (2017). The Testing Charade: Pretending to Make Schools Better. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226450954.001.0001

Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral Damage: How High-Stakes Testing Corrupts America’s Schools. Harvard Education Press.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10019

Shepard, L. A. (2019). Classroom assessment to support teaching and learning. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683(1), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219843818

Stiggins, R. J. (2018). The perfect assessment system. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12186

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001

Dedi Rolis and SDN Jatisura, 2025. Redefinition of Graduation Exams and the Role of Academic Ability Tests: Policy Analysis in Shaping Holistic Assessment and Growth Mindset of Students," Journal of Islamic Education and Teacher Training, 1(2), https://doi.org/10.61166/lpki.v1i2.12.

Febrianti, S. (2024). Sustainability Finance and Green Investment: Literature Review with the Prism Method. Management: Journal of Economics, 6(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.36985/pmyj1709

Has'ad Rahman Attamimi, and Hari Setiadi. 2020. Evaluation of Hots-Based Assessment in Indonesian Language Subjects at Sma Labschool Kebayoran Baru." Journal of Educational Research and Assessment, 3(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.22236/jppp.v3i1.5905.

Justin Eduardo Simarmata et al., 2022. Academic Ability Test Training for High School Students in Class XII for the Preparation of the 2022 UTBK SBMPTN," A Man Who Has Been Murdered, 9(2), 471–79, https://doi.org/10.29303/abdiinsani.v9i2.557.

Nikla Sekar Salsabila et al., 2022. The Relationship Between Types Of Admission Selection And Academic Achievement In The First-Year Students During The Transition To Distance Learning Due To Covid-19 Pandemic,” Indonesian Journal of Medical Education: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education, 11(1), 64, https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.64464.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Putri, D. F., Mangngiri, I., Mulyadi, T. K., & Novia, H. 2023. Training on Academic Ability Test (TKA) in the Field of Mathematics for Grade 12 Students of Samarinda City High School, Journal of Social Outreach. 2(1), 48–56, https://doi.org/10.15548/jso.v2i1.5069.

Pusmendik. 2025. Academic Ability Test (TKA). South Jakarta: Center for Educational Assessment.

Simarmata, Justin Eduardo, Yosepha Patricia Wua Laja, Cecilia Novianti Salsinha, et al. 2022. Academic Ability Test Training for High School Students in Grade XII for the Preparation of the 2022 UTBK SBMPTN." Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 9(2), 471–79. https://doi.org/10.29303/abdiinsani.v9i2.557.

Sriyati Sriyati, 2023. Analysis of the Correlation of Scholastic Potential with the Academic Ability of Grade 12 Students of SMAN 1 Situbondo," Journal of Physics Learning 11(4), 174, https://doi.org/10.19184/jpf.v11i4.35463.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-10

How to Cite

Analysis of Academic Ability Test (TKA) Policy at SMAN 1 and SMAN 2 Palangka Raya. (2026). Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 11(2), 500-506. https://doi.org/10.19109/tadrib.v11i2.32567