ANALYSIS OF ITEM QUALITY IN ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION SUBJECTS WITH RASCH MODELING

Main Article Content

Evita Evita
Eva Dwi Kumala Sari
Erni Susieni
Badrud Tamam

Abstract

The role of teachers in schools is expected, especially in evaluating student learning; teachers must pay attention to the quality of the items made. This study aims to determine the instrument's validity or the quality of the item's suitability with the model known as Item FIT (item suitability) on the End of Semester Assessment of Islamic Religious Education. The sample in this study was 216 respondents, using cluster random sampling. The results obtained; 1) the end-of-semester test given is categorized as easy when viewed from the level of student ability above the level of difficulty of the question; 2) the level of student ability is moderate with logit (0) producing very high information. Then, it will produce low information at the low or high ability level. It means that the PAI test produces maximum information when given to individuals with moderate ability. 3) Item fit criteria from 216 students, there are 93% that fit the model (fit model), and these students are said to fit the model because they have met at least two existing criteria; 4) The results of the analysis of the summary table above, 40 items analyzed there are 33 items (83%) that fit the model (fit model). 5) Reliability for Pearson reliability of 0.83 and item reliability of 0.97, it can be concluded that the consistency of student answers is good and the quality of the items in the PAI test is excellent reliability; 6) Gender bias analysis can be seen that 2 of the 40 items are DIF or need to be corrected because they harm certain gender groups.

Article Details

How to Cite
Evita, E., Sari, E. D. K., Susieni, E., & Tamam, B. (2023). ANALYSIS OF ITEM QUALITY IN ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION SUBJECTS WITH RASCH MODELING. Conciencia, 23(2), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.19109/conciencia.v23i2.19417
Section
Original Reserach Article

How to Cite

Evita, E., Sari, E. D. K., Susieni, E., & Tamam, B. (2023). ANALYSIS OF ITEM QUALITY IN ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION SUBJECTS WITH RASCH MODELING. Conciencia, 23(2), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.19109/conciencia.v23i2.19417

References

Arikunto. S. (2016). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Azwar, S. (1993). "Kelompok subjek ini memiliki harga diri yang rendah"; kok, tahu...? Buletin Psikologi, I (2), 13-17
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2013). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Psychology Press.
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2013). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer Science & Business Media.
Cahyati. S. (2018) “Analisis Butir Soal Ulangan Akhir Semester Gasal Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam”, Skripsi Sada Program PAI dan Ilmu Keguruan Purwokerto.
Djaali. 2017. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Groves, Robert M., Survey Methodology (2010), Second edition of the (2004) first edition ISBN 0-471-48348-6
Halik, A.S. ettall. (2019) “Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Sekolah Mata Pelajaran Matematika,” Makassar: Al-Asma journal of Islamic Education, Vol. 1, No. 1.
Hamzah, A. (2014) Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
I Wayan Eka Mahendra. I. W.E. (2019). “Analisis Butir Soal,” Bali: Workshop Peningkatan Kompetensi Evaluasi Pembelajaran Guru.
Kristiana, I.F. ettall. (2018) Analisis Rasch dalam UtrechtWorkEngagemen (UWES-9) Versi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Jurnal Psikologi, Vol. 17 No.2.
Purwanto. (2009).Evaluasi Hasil Belajar, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Purwanto. (2009). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Putra, Z.H. (2021). “Analisis Pengetahuan Matematika, Didaktika, dan Teknologi Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar Menggunakan Rasch Model”, Garut, Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, Vol.10, No. 3
Pratama, D. (2020). “Analisis Kualitas Tes Buatan Guru Melalui Pendekatan Item Response Theory (IRT) Model Rasch”. Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol.7, No.1.`
Rahmasari, D. & Ismiyati. (2016). “Analisis Butir Soal Mata Pelajaran Pengantar Administrasi Perkantoran,” Semarang: Economic Education Analysis Journal, Vol. 5, No.
Rustam, A, Sari, E.D.K., Yunita, L. (2018). Statistika & Pengukuran Pendidikan (Analisis Menggunakan SPSS, Iteman dan Liserel).
Sari, E. D. K., Rustam, A., & Yunita, L. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penelitian Sosial (Konsep, Tahapan dan contoh instrument, Analisis data menggunakan SPSS dan M-Plus, dan Winsteps) (1st ed.). Kun FayakunGenjong Kidul SidowarekNgoro Jombang Jawa Timur 61473.
Sari, E.D.K. ettall. (2021). “ Kualitas Butir Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester (PAS) yang disusun Guru Madrasah”. Jakarta: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Ilmu Sosial, Vol. 30 No. 1.
Sari, E.D.K. (2017). “ Isu-Isu Kritis dalam Pendidika, (Lemahnya Kualitas Tes Ujian Akhir sekolah berstandar Nasional (UASBN) ditingkat Sekolah Dasar ”. Bekasi: Jurnal Al Marhalah, Vol. 1 No. 1.
Sari, E.D.K., Falani, I,. (2021) Developing Instrumen to Measure Elelmentary School Teacher ‘Profesional Ethics in Indonesia’. Turki: elementary education online, 20 (2).
Sudijono. A. (2001). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sugiyono. (2016). Statistika untuk penelitian. Alfabeta.
Sumintono, B., &Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi model Rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial (edisi revisi). Trim KomunikataPublishing House.
Vockell, E. L. (1983). Educational Research. Mac Millan Publishing Co., Inc.
https://www.semestapsikometrika.com/2018/07/membuat-kategori-skor-skala-dengan-spss.html diakses pada January 12, 2021
Wahyudin, W. (2016) “Pendidikan Sepanjang Hayat Menurut Perspektif Islam.” Banten: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, Vol. 3, No. 2.
Wahyudi, D. (2016). “Konsep al-Qur’an tentang Hakikat Evaluasi dalam Pendidikan Islam,” Lampung: Hikmah, Vol. 12, No. 2.