EVALUATION OF THE MICROTEACHING COURSE PROGRAM USING THE CIPP MODEL: OPTIMIZING DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY TO ENHANCE PROSPECTIVE PHYSICS TEACHERS’ TEACHING READINESS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the Microteaching course program in the Physics Education Study Program using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model and to analyze the role of digital technology in enhancing prospective teachers’ teaching readiness. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, analysis of the course syllabus (RPS), and video documentation of Microteaching practices. Participants consisted of 19 seventh-semester students, one course instructor, and the Head of the Study Program. The Context evaluation showed that all components of the course syllabus were available and that there was a 100% alignment among Program Learning Outcomes (CPL), Course Learning Outcomes (CPMK), and course content. Regarding Input, students demonstrated good academic prerequisites, as indicated by 90% of them obtaining an A in the Physics Lesson Planning course; however, only 21.1% owned relevant textbooks, and facilities such as a dedicated Microteaching room and documentation equipment still require improvement. The Process evaluation revealed that 100% of students used technology in their Microteaching practices, particularly through presentation media, virtual simulations, and instructional videos, and some of them utilized artificial intelligence (AI) tools to support lesson planning. The Product evaluation indicated that most students achieved high final grades in the Microteaching course and reported positive perceptions of its contribution to their teaching readiness. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening students’ digital literacy, providing adequate facilities specifically designed for Microteaching, and systematically training teaching skills that integrate digital technology in order to further optimize the quality of the Microteaching course.
Downloads
Article Details
How to Cite
References
Astuti, M., Suryana, I., Rizki, M., Maharani, A. S., Susanti, F., Della Saputri, L., & Malik, A. R. (2024). Microteaching Sebagai Pusat Sumber Belajar. Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science, 4(5), 710-718.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
Dayal, H. C., & Alpana, R. (2020). Secondary pre-service teachers’ reflections on their micro-teaching: Feedback and self-evaluation. Waikato Journal of Education, 25, 73-83.
Erdemir, N., & Yeşilçınar, S. (2021). Reflective practices in micro teaching from the perspective of preservice teachers: teacher feedback, peer feedback and self-reflection. Reflective Practice, 22(6), 766-781.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., Worthen, B. R., & Wingate, L. A. (2012). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Pearson Boston.
Ginting, R. F., & Hamidah, N. (2024). Efektivitas Micro Teaching Dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Mengajar: Tinjauan Literatur. Sindoro: Cendikia Pendidikan, 6(10), 21-30.
Khaksar, M., Kiany, G. R., & ShayesteFar, P. (2023). Using a CIPP-Based Model for Evaluation of Teacher Training Programs in a Private-Sector EFL Institutes. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 38, 65-91.
Lai, J. W., & Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review. Computers & Education, 133, 27-42.
Luo, Z., & Li, H. (2024). Competence, preparation, and relaxation: Contributing factors to EFL student teachers' self-efficacy and teaching performance in microteaching training. Heliyon, 10(4).
Ledger, S., & Fischetti, J. (2020). Micro-teaching 2.0: Technology as the classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 37-54.
Lestari, C. R., Fahmy, Z., Wati, M. L. K., Wagiran, W., & Subyantoro, S. (2024). Tinjauan Holistik Pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing di UIN Walisongo: Pendekatan Inovatif dengan Model CIPP. GERAM: Gerakan Aktif Menulis, 12(1), 179-192.
Meiklejohn, S., Anderson, A., Brock, T., Kumar, A., Maddock, B., Wright, C., ... & Kent, F. (2023). The utility of an interprofessional education framework and its impacts upon perceived readiness of graduates for collaborative practice. A multimethod evaluation using the context, input, process, product (CIPP) model. Nurse Education Today, 121, 105707.
Rachayu, I., & Bachri, B. S. (2023). Evaluasi Program Kompetensi Pedagogi Sebagai Calon Guru Terus Bergerak, Tergerak Dan Menggerakkan (Ttm) Era Kurikulum Merdeka Melalui Pengalaman Lapangan. JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(3), 3215-3225.
Rahmawati, R., Rahmawati, F., Putri, R. D., Nurdin, N., & Rizal, Y. (2022). Pengembangan Virtual Reality dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kesiapan Mahasiswa untuk Menghadapi Pengenalan Lapangan Persekolahan. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(6), 10016-10025.
Raibowo, S., & Nopiyanto, Y. E. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga & Kesehatan pada SMP Negeri Se-Kabupaten Mukomuko melalui Pendekatan Model Context, Input, Process & Product (CIPP). Jurnal Pendidikan Kesehatan Rekreasi, 6(2), 146-165.
Setiawan, Z., Pustikayasa, I. M., Jayanegara, I. N., Setiawan, I. N. A. F., Putra, I. N. A. S., Yasa, I. W. A. P., ... & Gunawan, I. G. D. (2023). Pendidikan multimedia: Konsep dan Aplikasi pada era revolusi industri 4.0 menuju society 5.0. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Suranto, D. I., Annur, S., & Alfiyanto, A. (2022). Pentingnya manajemen sarana dan prasarana dalam meningkatkan mutu pendidikan. Jurnal Kiprah Pendidikan, 1(2), 59-66.
Toosi, M., Modarres, M., Amini, M., & Geranmayeh, M. (2021). Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model in medical education: A systematic review. Journal of education and health promotion, 10(1), 199.
Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Fernández-Sánchez, M. R., Revuelta Dominguez, F. I., & Sosa-Díaz, M. J. (2021). The educational integration of digital technologies preCovid-19: Lessons for teacher education. PloS one, 16(8), e0256283.
Widiyanto, I. P., & Wahyuni, E. T. (2020). Implementasi perencanaan pembelajaran. Satya Sastraharing: Jurnal Manajemen, 4(2), 16-35.
Zalavra, E., & Makri, K. (2022). Relocating online a technology-enhanced microteaching practice in teacher education: Challenges and implications. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(3), 270-283.