Cognitive Level of Chromebook-Based Summative Assessment Questions on The Independent Curriculum in Driving Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19109/2nvack10Keywords:
Cognitive Process Dimension, Chromebook-Based Assessment, Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS)Abstract
This study aims to describe the cognitive level of chromebook-based summative assessment questions in the Merdeka Curriculum in driving schools. This research is a qualitative study using textual data analysis. The data source in this study is chromebook-based summative assessment items on the independent curriculum at the driving school. The results of the research obtained are Chromebook-based summative assessment questions on the independent curriculum in driving schools that do not contain all levels of the cognitive process dimension, because there are no questions with the C5-Evaluation level and the C6-Creating level. The questions are still dominated by the C2-Understanding level which can be categorized as LOTS (Lower Order Thingking Skills). This has an impact on the lack of students' critical thinking skills.References
Adinda, A. H., Siahaan, H. E., Raihani, I. F., Aprida, N., Fitri, N., & Suryanda, A. (2021). Penilaian Sumatif dan Penilaian Formatif Pembelajaran Online. Report Of Biology Education, 2(1), hlm. 1-10.
Aryanti, N., Haryono, B., & Genua, V. (2022). Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi Digital Era Metaverse. In Sistem informasi dan teknologi digital era Metaverse.
Atiullah, K., Wuli Fitriati, S., & Rukmini, D. (2019). Using Revised Bloomâ€TMs Taxonomy to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking Skills (Hots) in Reading Comprehension Questions of English Textbook for Year X of High School. English Education Journal, 9(4), hlm. 428–436. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v9i4.31794
Cheng, Y., Cai, Y., Chen, H., Cai, Z., Wu, G., & Huang, J. (2021). A Cognitive Level Evaluation Method Based on a Deep Neural Network for Online Learning: From a Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognition Objectives Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, hlm. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661235
Hamdi, S., Triatna, C., & Nurdin, N. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka dalam Perspektif Pedagogik. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 7(1), hlm. 10-17. https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v7i1.13015
Handayani, L., Harsiati, T., & Mashfufah, A. (2022). Analisis Level Kognitif Soal Pas 1 Ipa Pada Upt Sp Sdn Karangtengah 3 Kota Blitar. 3(2), hlm. 256–262.
Harahap, A. S. N., & Natsir, M. (2021). Prioritizing Higher Order Thinking Skills ( HOTS ) Based on the 2013 Curriculum on Language Learning Evaluation at the Tertiary Level Education in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Education, Social Sciences and Research, 2(1), hlm. 138–146. http://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/ijessr/article/view/6412
Izza, A. Z., Falah, M., & Susilawati, S. (2020). Studi literatur: problematika evaluasi pembelajaran dalam mencapai tujuan pendidikan di era merdeka belajar. Konferensi Ilmiah Pendidikan Universitas Pekalongan. https://proceeding.unikal.ac.id/index.php/kip
Jannah, I. K., Mahanal, S., & Mashfufah, A. (2023). Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Soal Asesmen Sumatif Akhir Semester I (ASAS I) IPA Berbasis Jenis Soal AKM berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom di Kelas V SD Swasta Kota Malang. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2), hlm. 806–810. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i2.1633
Jojor, A., & Sihotang, H. (2022). Analisis Kurikulum Merdeka dalam Mengatasi Learning Loss di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Analisis Studi Kasus Kebijakan Pendidikan). Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), hlm. 5150–5161. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.3106
Kemdikbud. (2018). Mendikbud Imbau Guru Terus Kembangkan Model Pembelajaran HOTS 10. 11103.
Muhayimana, T., Kwizera, L., & Nyirahabimana, M. R. (2022). Using Bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate the cognitive levels of Primary Leaving English Exam questions in Rwandan schools. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(1), hlm. 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-021-00156-2
Riadi, M., Kamase, J., M. (2021). Pengaruh Harga, Promosi Dan Kualitas Layanan Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen Mobil Toyota (Studi Kasus Pada PT. Hadji Kalla Cabang Alauddin). Journal of Management Science (JMS), Vol 2(1), hlm. 41-58.
Rinjaya, D., & Halimi, S. S. (2022). An Evaluation of Indonesian Textbooks Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 16(1), hlm. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v16i1.5813
Saputra, H. T., & Pujiati, H. (2021). Cognitive Domain of Revised Bloom Taxonomy in English Student Book. JELT (Journal Of English Language and Literature Teaching, 6(1), hlm. 61–66.
Saputri, M. A., Widianti, N., Lestari, S. A., & Hasanah, U. (2023). Ragam Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(1), 38–53.
Setyowati, Y., Susanto, S., & Munir, A. (2021). World journal on educational technology: Current issues. A Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Evaluation of Formal Written Language Test Items. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(4), hlm. 1317–1331. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i5.7296
Shi, Y., & Qu, S. (2021). Cognition and Academic Performance: Mediating Role of Personality Characteristics and Psychology Health. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774548
Sutopo, A., & Budi, T. S. (2016). ISSN 2407-9189 The 4 th University Research Coloquium 2016 The 4 th University (p. hlm. 338–346). Research Coloquium 2016.
Syarnubi, S., Alimron, A., & Muhammad, F. (2022). Model Pendidikan Karakter di Perguruan Tinggi. CV. Insan Cendekia Palembang.
Syarnubi, S., Syarifuddin, A., & Sukirman, S. (2023). Curriculum Design for the Islamic Religious Education Study Program in the Era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, Vol 15(4), hlm. 6333-6341.
Syarnubi, Syarnubi, Arvin Efriani, Suzana Pranita, Zulhijra Zulhijra, Baldi Anggara, Alimron Alimron, Maryamah Maryamah, and R. R. (2024). “An analysis of student errors in solving HOTS mathematics problems based on the newman procedure.” In AIP Conference Proceedings, 3058(1).
Syarnubi. (2023). Peran Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam Menanamkan Nilai-Nilai Moderasi Beragama. Prosiding Seminar Nasional. Vol 1(1), 114.
Triarisanti, R., Oktavianto, D. B., & Sukyadi, D. (n.d.). Critical Thinking Abilities and Korean Reading Skills: To what extent do they correlate? Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2022). In 2022 (p. hlm. 485–489). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-91-6_76
Urgo, K., Arguello, J., & Capra, R. (2019). Anderson and Krathwohl’s two-dimensional taxonomy applied to task creation and learning assessment (p. hlm. 117–124). Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval, ICTIR 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341981.3344226
Wiranata, W. (2022). 11150162000039_Willy Wiranata. Institutional Repository UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta 01.
Wulandari, M. D., Patriana, W. D., & S. (2021). Pengelolaan Pembelajaran Berorientasi Literasi Numerasi di Sekolah Dasar dalam Kegiatan Kurikuler dan Ekstrakurikuler. Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pengembangan Sekolah Dasar, 9(2), hlm. 116–131.
Zahoor, A.-W., Farooqui, S. I., Khan, A., Kazmi, S. A. M., Qamar, N., & Rizvi, J. (2023). Evaluation of Cognitive Domain in Objective Exam of Physiotherapy Teaching Program by Using Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU, 13(2), hlm.289–293. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755447
